Advertisement

Virtual Gaze. A Pilot Study on the Effects of Computer Simulated Gaze in Avatar-Based Conversations

  • Gary Bente
  • Felix Eschenburg
  • Nicole. C. Krämer
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4563)

Abstract

The paper introduces a novel methodology for the computer simulation of gaze behavior in net-based interactions. 38 female participants interacted using a special avatar platform, allowing for the real-time transmission of nonverbal behavior (head and body movement, gestures, gaze) as captured by motion trackers, eye tracking devices and data gloves. During interaction eye movement and gaze direction of one partner was substituted by computer simulated data. Simulated duration of directed gaze (looking into the face of the vis-a-vis) was varied lasting 2 seconds in one condition and 4 seconds in the other. Mutual person perception (impression ratings) and individual experience of social presence (short questionnaire) were measured as dependent variables. The results underline the validity of the computer animation approach. Consistent with the literature the longer gaze duration was found to cause significantly better evaluations of the interaction partners and higher levels of co-presence.

Keywords

Computer mediated communication nonverbal behavior social gaze methodology person perception social presence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., McGuire, T.W.: Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist 39(10), 1123–1134 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Biocca, F., Harms, C., Gregg, J.: The Networked Minds Measure of Social Presence: Pilot Test Factor Structure and Concurrent Validity. In: Presence 2001. Philadelphia, PA (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Biocca, F.C., Harms, C., Burgoon, J.K.: Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence-Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 12(5), 456–480 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Exline, R.V., Gray, D., Schuette, D.: Visual behavior in a dyad as affected by interview content and sex of respondent. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1(3), 201–209 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Exline, R.V.: Visual interaction: The glances of power and preference (1971)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fehr, B.J., Exline, R.V.: Social visual interaction: A conceptual and literature review, In: Siegman, A.W., Feldstein, S. (eds) Nonverbal behavior and communication 2nd edn. pp. 225–325 1987 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 640, Hillsdale, NJ, England (1987) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Argyle, M., Cook, M.: Gaze and mutual gaze, p. 210. Cambridge University Press, Oxford, England (1976)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abele, A.: Functions of gaze in social interaction: Communication and monitoring. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 10(2), 83–101 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bavelas, J.B., Coates, L., Johnson, T.: Listener responses as a collaborative process: The role of gaze. Journal of Communication 52(3), 566–580 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kleinke, C.L.: Gaze and eye contact: A research review. Psychological Bulletin 100(1), 78–100 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Larsen, R.J., Shackelford, T.K.: Gaze avoidance: Personality and social judgments of people who avoid direct face-to-face contact. Personality and Individual Differences 21(6), 907–917 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garau, M., Slater, M., Bee, S., Sasse, M.A.: The impact of eye gaze on communication using humanoid avatars. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 309–316. ACM Press, Seattle, Washington, United States (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bailenson, J.N., Beall, A.C., Loomis, J., Blascovich, J., Turk, M.: Transformed Social Interaction, Augmented Gaze, and Social Influence in Immersive Virtual Environments. Human Communication Research 31(4), 511–537 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bente, G., Donaghy, W.C., Suwelack, D.: Sex differences in body movement and visual attention: An integrated analysis of movement and gaze in mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 22(1), 31–58 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mehrabian, A.: Relationship of attitude to seated posture, orientation, and distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 10(1), 26–30 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Argyle, M., Lefebvre, L., Cook, M.: The meaning of five patterns of gaze. European Journal of Social Psychology 4(2), 125–136 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ellsworth, P.C.: The Meaningful Look (Review of Argyle & Cook). Semiotica 24, 341–351 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Williams, G.P., Kleinke, C.L.: Effects of mutual gaze and touch on attraction, mood, and cardiovascular reactivity. Journal of Research in Personality 27(2), 170–183 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mason, M.F., Tatkow, E.P., Macrae, C.N.: The Look of Love: Gaze Shifts and Person Perception. Psychological Science 16(3), 236–239 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brooks, C.I., Church, M.A., Fraser, L.: Effects of duration of eye contact on judgments of personality characteristics. Journal of Social Psychology 126(1), 71–78 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Knackstedt, G., Kleinke, C.L.: Eye contact, gender, and personality judgments. Journal of Social Psychology 131(2), 303–304 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Droney, J.M., Brooks, C.I.: Attributions of self-esteem as a function of duration of eye contact. Journal of Social Psychology 133(5), 715–722 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Napieralski, L.P., Brooks, C.I., Droney, J.M.: The effect of duration of eye contact on American college students’ attributions of state, trait, and test anxiety. Journal of Social Psychology 135(3), 273–280 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Burgoon, J.K., Manusov, V., Mineo, P., Hale, J.L.: Effects of gaze on hiring, credibility, attraction and relational message interpretation. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 9(3), 133–146 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Baron Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Jolliffe, T.: Is there a language of the eyes? Evidence from normal adults, and adults with autism or Asperger syndrome. Visual Cognition 4(3), 311–331 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Macrae, C.N., Hood, B.M., Milne, A.B., Rowe, A.C., Mason, M.F.: Are you looking at me? Eye gaze and person perception. Psychological Science 13(5), 460–464 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Naiman, T.H., Breed, G.: Gaze duration as a cue for judging conversational tone. Representative Research in Social Psychology 5(2), 115–122 (1974)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Patterson, M.L.: Functions of non-verbal behavior in social interaction. In: Giles, H., Robinson, W.P. (eds.) Handbook of language and social psychology, pp. 101–120. John Wiley & Sons, Oxford, England (1990)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Patterson, M.L.: Strategic functions of nonverbal exchange. In: Daly, J.A., Wiemann, J.M. (eds.) Strategic interpersonal communication, pp. 273–293. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, England (1994)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Iizuka, Y.: Gaze during speaking as related to shyness. Perceptual and Motor Skills 78(3, Pt 2), 1259–1264 (1994)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kleinke, C.L., Staneski, R.A., Berger, D.E.: Evaluation of an interviewer as a function of interviewer gaze, reinforcement of subject gaze, and interviewer attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31(1), 115–122 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lewis, R.J., Derlega, V.J., Shankar, A., Cochard, E., Finkel, L.: Nonverbal correlates confederates’ touch: Confounds in touch research. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 12(3), 821–830 (1997)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kelly, E.W., True, J.H.: Eye contact and communication of faciliative conditions. Perceptual and Motor Skills 51(3), 815–820 (1980)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Blascovich, J., et al.: Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry 13(2), 103–124 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bente, G., Krämer, N.C., Petersen, A., de Ruiter, J.P.: Computer animated movement and person perception: Methodological advances in nonverbal behavior research. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 25(3), 151–166 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bente, G., Feist, A., Elder, S.: Person perception effects of computer-simulated male and female head movement. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 20(4), 213–228 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bente, G., Petersen, A., Krämer, N.C., de Ruiter, J.P.: Transcript-based computer animation of movement: Evaluating a new tool for nonverbal behavior research. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers 33(3), 303–310 (2001)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Krämer, N.C.: Bewegende Bewegung. Sozio-emotionale Wirkungen nonverbalen Verhaltens und deren experimentelle Untersuchung mittels Computeranimation. Pabst Science Publishers (2001)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rüggenberg, S., Bente, G., Krämer, N.: Virtual encounters. Creating social presence in net-based collaborations. In: Presence 2005, London, UK (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary Bente
    • 1
  • Felix Eschenburg
    • 1
  • Nicole. C. Krämer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, University of Cologne, Bernhard-Feilchenfeldstr.11, 50969 CologneGermany

Personalised recommendations