Who Is Taking over Control? A Psychological Perspective in Examining Effects of Agent-Based Negotiation Support Technologies

  • Yinping Yang
  • John Lim
  • Yingqin Zhong
  • Xiaojia Guo
  • Xue Li
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4562)

Abstract

This paper attempts to understand the effects of agent-based negotiation mechanisms through human’s psychological perspective. We argue that the impact of automated negotiation, despite its efficacy and effectiveness, may result in a shift of negotiators’ beliefs on their control over the choice of negotiation tactics and decision making process; such loss of control in turn causes an increase of user anxiety towards the system. In addition, individual differences, such as negotiators’ decision-making style patterns are posited to moderate the relationship of system types and users’ perceptions. The study involves an experiment employing randomized block design. Findings suggest significant impact of types of negotiation support systems on perceived control, as well as a negative relationship between perceived control and system anxiety. However, the moderating effect of decision-making style patterns is not evident in our data. Discussions and implications are drawn.

Keywords

perceived control system anxiety negotiation support systems intelligent agents decision-making style 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Averill, J.R.: Personal Control over Aversive Stimuli and Its Relationship to Stress. Psychological Bulletin 80, 286–303 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Azjen, I.: Theory of Planned Behavior. Orga.l Behav. and Human Deci. Process 50, 179–211 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blecherman, B.: Adopting automated negotiation. Tech. in Society 21, 167–174 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown, S.A., Fuller, R.M., Vivian, C.: Who’s Afraid of the Virtual World? Anxiety and Computer-Mediated Communication. J. of the Association for Information Systems 5, 79–107 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chari, K., Agrawal, M.: Multi-issue Automated Negotiations Using Agents. INFORMS J. of Comp. (Accepted, Forthcoming, 2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crable, E.A., Brodzinski, J.D., Scherer, R.F., Jones, P.D: The Impact of Cognitive Appraisal, Locus of Control and Level of Exposure on the Computer Anxiety of Novice Computer User. J. of Edu. Comp. Research 10, 329–340 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Delaney, M.M., Foroughi, A., Perkins, W.C.: An Empirical Study of the Efficacy of a Computerized Negotiation Support System (NSS). Deci. Sup. Sys. 20, 185–197 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frese, M.: Theory of Control and Complexity: Implications for Software Design and Integration of Computer Systems into the Work Place. In: Frese, M., Ulich, E., Dzida, W. (eds.) Psychological Issues of Human Computer Interaction in the Work Place, Elsevier Science Publishers, Holland (1987)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goh, K.Y., Teo, H.H., Wu, H.X., Wei, K.K.: Computer-Supported Negotiations: An Experimental Study of Bargaining in Electronic Commerce. In: Proc. of the 21st Annual Int. Conf. on Info. Sys. Brisbane, Australia (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang, P., Sycara, K.: A Computational Model for Online Agent Negotiation. In: Proc.of the 35th Hawaii Int. Conf.on Sys Sci. Hawaii (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Joncour, N., Sinclair, K., Bailey, M.: Computer Anxiety, Computer Experience and Self-Efficacy. In: Proc.of Annual Conf.of the Australian Assoc. for Research in Edu. Newcastle, New South Wales (1994)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jones, B.H.: Analytical Negotiation: An Empirical Examination of the effects of Computer Support for Different Levels of Conflict in Two-Party Bargaining. Ph.D. Dissert., Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA (1988) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lacey, H.M.: Control, perceived control, and the methodological role of cognitive constructs. In: Perlmuter, L.C., Monty, R.A. (eds.) Choice and Perceived Control, Lawrence Erbaumn Associates, Hillsdale, NJ (1979)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lim, L.H., Benbasat, I.: A Theoretical Perspective of Negotiation Systems. J. of Manag. Info. Sys. 9, 27–44 (1993)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lopes, F., Novais, A.Q., Mamede, N., Coelho, H.: Negotiation Tactics for Autonomous Agents. In: 12th Int. Workshop on Database and Expert Sys. App, 0708 (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Luo, X., Jennings, N.R., Shadbolt, N.: Acquiring user tradeoff strategies and preferences for negotiation agents: A default-then-adjust method. Int. J. of Human-Comp. Studies 64, 304–321 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morris, S.A., Marshall, T.E.: Perceived Control in Information Systems. J. of Org. and End User Comp 16, 38–56 (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oliver, J.R.: A Machine Learning Approach to Automated Negotiation and Prospects for Electronic Commerce. J. of Manag. Info. Sys. 13, 83–112 (1997)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ramalingam, V., Weidenbeck, S.: Development and Validation of Scores on a Computer Programming Self-Efficacy Scale and Group Analyses of Novice Programmer Self-Efficacy. J. of Edu. Comp. Research 19, 367–381 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rangaswamy, A., Shell, G.R.: Using Computers to Realize Joint Gains in Negotiations: Toward an Electronic Bargaining Table. Manag. Sci. 43, 1147–1163 (1997)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rowe, A.J., Boulgarides, J.D.: Managerial Decision Making: A Guide to Successful Business Decisions. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rowe, A.J., Mason, R.O.: Managing with Style. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1987)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sandholm, T.: Automated Negotiation. Commu. of the ACM 42, 84–85 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sengupta, K., Te’eni, D.: Cognitive Feedback in GDSS: Improving Control and Convergence. MIS Quart. 17, 87–109 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Spielberger, C.D.: Conceptual and Methodological Issues in Anxiety Research. In: Spielberger, C.D., Sarason, I.G. (eds.) Anxiety: Current Trends in Theory and Research (2), pp. 481–494. Academic Press, New York (1972)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yang, Y.P., Zhong, Y., Guo, X.J., Lim, J.: An Empirical Study on Negotiators’ Perceived Control and System Anxiety towards Agent-based Negotiation Support Tool. In: Proc. of Grp. Dec. and Nego. 2005. Vienna, Austria (July 10-13, 2005)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yang, Y.P., Lim, J., Chen, Y.: Alternate Designs on Agent-Based e-Negotiation Systems: Concepts and Implementation. In: 16th Workshop on Info. Tech. and Sys. WITS2006, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA (December 9-10, 2006)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zeng, D., Sycara, K.: Bayesian Learning in Negotiation. Int. J. of Human- Comp. Studies 48(1), 125–141 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yinping Yang
    • 1
  • John Lim
    • 1
  • Yingqin Zhong
    • 1
  • Xiaojia Guo
    • 1
  • Xue Li
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computing, National University of Singapore, 3 Science Drive 2,117543Singapore

Personalised recommendations