Advertisement

Comparing User and Software Information Structures for Compatibility

  • Thomas Plocher
  • Torkil Clemmensen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4560)

Abstract

Eastern and Western cultures differ quite systematically in how they group objects, functions and concepts into categories [1,2,3]. This has implications for how navigation features, such as menus, links, directories, should be designed in software applications. This is particularly of interest when the application is developed in one culture for use in a second culture. This paper presents this problem and discusses some approaches to comparing user and software information architectures both visually and quantitatively.

Keywords

culture cognition information architecture usability visualization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Nisbett, R.E., Peng, K., Choi, I., Norenzayan, A.: Culture and systems of thought: Holistic vs. analytic cognition. Psychological Review 108, 291–310 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nisbett, R.E.: The Geography of Thought: Why We Think the Way We Do. The Free Press, NewYork (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Choi, I., Nisbett, R.E.: Culture, categorization, and inductive reasoning. Cognition 65, 15–32 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Choong, Y-Y.: Design of computer interfaces for the Chinese population. PhD Dissertation. Purdue University (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clemmensen, T., Plocher, T.: The Cultural Usability Project (CULTUSAB): Studies of Cultural Models in Psychological Usability Evaluation Methods. In: HCI International Conference, Beijing, China (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dong, J., Martin, S., Waldo, P.A: user input and analysis tool for information architecture. In: CHI 2001 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 22–24 (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Andrews, K.: Information Visualization. In: Tutorial Notes, IICM, Graz University of Technology, pp. 10–21 (2002), http://www.iicm.edu/ivis
  8. 8.
    Robertson, G.G., Mackinlay, J.D., Card, S.K.: Cone trees: Animated 3D visualizations of hierarchical information. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGSCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 194–1890. ACM Press, New York (1991)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jeong, C., Pang, A.: Reconfigurable Disc Trees for visualizing large hierarchical information spaces. In: Proceedings of Information Visualization 1998, pp. 19–25 (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Robertson, G.G., Czerwinski, M.P., Churchill, J.E.: Visualization of mappings between schemas. In: Proceedings of CHI 2005, Portland Oregon, pp. 431–439 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Plocher
    • 1
  • Torkil Clemmensen
    • 2
  1. 1.Honeywell Laboratories, 3660 Technology Drive, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55418USA
  2. 2.Department of Informatics, Copenhagen Business School, Howitzvej 60, 2.10, DK - 2000 Frederiksberg C 

Personalised recommendations