Is the Intelligent Environment Smart Enough?

  • Laura Burzagli
  • Pier Luigi Emiliani
  • Francesco Gabbanini
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4555)


Ambient Intelligence (AmI) is considered a likely future embodiment of the information society, according to development scenarios proposed worldwide. With reference to the scenarios developed in Europe by the Information Society Technology Advisory Group (ISTAG), this position paper maintains that, up to now, the attention has been more on the smart objects that are supposed to populate the environment and their interfaces than on the “intelligence” of the entire system. The latter is of paramount importance if users are to be served according to the specifications of the AmI environments. Correspondingly, the current notion of Design for All needs to be revised in order to take into account the additional complexity of the emerging information society. Examples of the main points to be considered are offered in order to elicit discussion.


Information Society Ambient Intelligence Smart Object Multimodal Interaction European Union Commission 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ducatel, K., Bogdanowicz, M., Scapolo, F., Leijten, J., Burgelman, J.C.: Scenarios for ambient intelligence in 2010. Technical report, Information Society Technologies Programme of the European Union Commission (IST) (February 2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coroama, V.: Experiences from the design of a ubiquitous computing system for the blind. In: CHI 2006: extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 664–669. ACM Press, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Richter, K., Hellenschmidt, M.: Position paper: Interacting with the ambience: Multimodal interaction and ambient intelligence. In: W3CWorkshop on Multimodal Interaction, 19./20.07.2004, Sophia Antipolis, France (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Johanson, B., Winograd, T., Fox, A.: Interactive workspaces. Computer 36(4), 99–101 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garlan, D., Siewiorek, D., Smailagic, A., Steenkiste, P.: Project aura: Towards distraction-free pervasive computing. IEEE Pervasive computing 1(2), 22–31 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stephanidis, C.: User Interfaces for All. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Emiliani, P.L., Stephanidis, C.: Universal access to ambient intelligence environments: opportunities and challenges for people with disabilities. IBM Systems Journal 44(3), 605–619 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Emiliani, P.L.: Assistive technology (at) versus mainstream technology (mst): The research perspective. Technology and Disabilty 18(1), 19–29 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coutaz, J., Crowley, J.L., Dobson, S., Garlan, D.: Context is key. Commun. ACM 48(3), 49–53 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    ISTAG, Ambient Intelligence: from vision to reality. For participation in society and business. Information Society Technologies Programme of the European Union Commission (IST) (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura Burzagli
    • 1
  • Pier Luigi Emiliani
    • 1
  • Francesco Gabbanini
    • 1
  1. 1.IFAC-CNR, Via Madonna del Piano, 10, Sesto Fiorentino, FirenzeItaly

Personalised recommendations