Advertisement

Completing Herbelin’s Programme

  • José Espírito Santo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4583)

Abstract

In 1994 Herbelin started and partially achieved the programme of showing that, for intuitionistic implicational logic, there is a Curry-Howard interpretation of sequent calculus into a variant of the λ-calculus, specifically a variant which manipulates formally “applicative contexts” and inverts the associativity of “applicative terms”. Herbelin worked with a fragment of sequent calculus with constraints on left introduction. In this paper we complete Herbelin’s programme for full sequent calculus, that is, sequent calculus without the mentioned constraints, but where permutative conversions necessarily show up. This requires the introduction of a lambda-like calculus for full sequent calculus and an extension of natural deduction that gives meaning to “applicative contexts” and “applicative terms”. Such extension is a calculus with modus ponens and primitive substitution that refines von Plato’s natural deduction; it is also a “coercion calculus”, in the sense of Cervesato and Pfenning. The proof-theoretical outcome is noteworthy: the puzzling relationship between cut and substitution is settled; and cut-elimination in sequent calculus is proven isomorphic to normalisation in the proposed natural deduction system. The isomorphism is the mapping that inverts the associativity of applicative terms.

Keywords

Reduction Rule Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus Applicative Context Typing Rule 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cervesato, I., Pfenning, F.: A linear spine calculus. Journal of Logic and Computation 13(5), 639–688 (2003)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Curien, P.-L., Herbelin, H.: The duality of computation. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Functional Programming 2000, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2000)Google Scholar
  3. Dyckhoff, R., Pinto, L.: Cut-elimination and a permutation-free sequent calculus for intuitionistic logic. Studia Logica 60, 107–118 (1998)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dyckhoff, R., Pinto, L.: Permutability of proofs in intuitionistic sequent calculi. Theoretical Computer Science 212, 141–155 (1999)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Santo, J.E.: Conservative extensions of the λ-calculus for the computational interpretation of sequent calculus. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh (2002) Available at http://www.lfcs.informatics.ed.ac.uk/reports/
  6. Espírito Santo, J.: An isomorphism between a fragment of sequent calculus and an extension of natural deduction. In: Baaz, M., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2514, pp. 354–366. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)Google Scholar
  7. Espírito Santo, J.: Delayed substitutions. In: Baader, F. (ed.) Proceedings of RTA’07. LNCS, Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  8. Espírito Santo, J., Pinto, L.: Permutative conversions in intuitionistic multiary sequent calculus with cuts. In: Hofmann, M.O. (ed.) TLCA 2003. LNCS, vol. 2701, pp. 286–300. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  9. Gallier, J.: Constructive logics. Part I: A tutorial on proof systems and typed λ-calculi. Theoretical Computer Science 110, 248–339 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gentzen, G.: Investigations into logical deduction. In: Szabo, M.E. (ed.) The collected papers of Gerhard Gentzen, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1969)Google Scholar
  11. Herbelin, H.: A λ-calculus structure isomorphic to a Gentzen-style sequent calculus structure. In: Pacholski, L., Tiuryn, J. (eds.) CSL 1994. LNCS, vol. 933, pp. 61–75. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Joachimski, F., Matthes, R.: Short proofs of normalization for the simply-typed lambda-calculus, permutative conversions and Gödel’s T. Archive for Mathematical Logic 42, 59–87 (2003)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kesner, D., Puel, L., Tannen, V.: A typed pattern calculus. Information and Computation, 124(1) (1995)Google Scholar
  14. Mints, G.: Normal forms for sequent derivations. In: Odifreddi, P. (ed.) Kreiseliana, pp. 469–492. A.K. Peters, Wellesley, MA (1996)Google Scholar
  15. Negri, S., von Plato, J.: Structural Proof Theory. Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  16. Parigot, M.: λμ-calculus: an algorithmic interpretation of classic natural deduction. In: Voronkov, A. (ed.) LPAR 1992. LNCS, vol. 624, Springer, Heidelberg (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pottinger, G.: Normalization as a homomorphic image of cut-elimination. Annals of Mathematical Logic 12, 323–357 (1977)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Prawitz, D.: Natural Deduction. A Proof-Theoretical Study. Almquist and Wiksell, Stockholm (1965)Google Scholar
  19. Schwichtenberg, H.: Termination of permutative conversions in intuitionistic gentzen calculi. Theoretical Computer Science, 212 (1999)Google Scholar
  20. von Plato, J.: Natural deduction with general elimination rules. Annals of Mathematical Logic 40(7), 541–567 (2001)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wadler, P.: A Curry-Howard isomorphism for sequent calculus, Manuscript (1993)Google Scholar
  22. Zucker, J.: The correspondence between cut-elimination and normalization. Annals of Mathematical Logic 7, 1–112 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Espírito Santo
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Matemática, Universidade do MinhoPortugal

Personalised recommendations