Advertisement

Group Collaboration and Learning Through Online Assessments: Comparison of Collaborative and Participatory Online Exams

  • Jia Shen
  • Starr Roxanne Hiltz
  • Michael Bieber
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4553)

Abstract

Online environments are regarded as well constructed to support collaborative and social learning. This research investigates small group collaboration and learning in the context of online exams. Incorporating constructivism and collaborative learning theories, the online Collaborative Exam features students’ active participation in various phases of the exam process through small group activities. The online Participatory Exam features similar processes except that students participate in the exam individually. A large scale field experiment was conducted to compare the two exam structures in terms of learning strategies and exam outcomes. Results show that students in the collaborative exam adopted significantly higher levels of social engagement than those in the participatory exam, learned from other students, and formed a sense of learning community. Areas for future research are briefly discussed.

Keywords

Group collaboration collaborative exam participatory exam online assessment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dewey, J.: Experience and Education. MacMillan Press, New York (1963)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vygotsky, L.: Thought and Language. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1962)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hiltz, S.R.: The Virtual Classroom: Using Computer-Mediated Communication for University Teaching. Journal of Communication 36, 95–104 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harasim, L.: On-Line Education: Perspectives on a New Environment. Praeger, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Swan, K., Shea, P.J.: The Development of Virtual Learning Communities," in Learning Together Online. In: Hiltz, S.R., Goldman, R. (eds.) Research on Asynchronous Learning Networks, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alavi, M., Dufner, D.: Technology-Mediated Collaborative Learning: A Research Perspective, in Learning Together Online. In: Hiltz, S.R., Goldman, R. (eds.) Research on Asynchronous Learning Networks, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hiltz, S.R., Goldman, R.: Learning Together Online. In: Research on Asynchronous Learning Networks, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kwok, R.C.W., Ma, J.: Use of a Group Support System for Collaborative Assessment. Computers & Education 32, 109–125 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wilson, E.V.: Examnet Asynchronous Learning Network: Augmenting Face-to-Face Course with Student-Developed Exam Questions. Computers & Education 42, 87–107 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shindler, J.: Examining the Soundness of Collaborative Essay Exams in Teacher Education Courses, National Forum of Teacher Education Journal 12 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shindler, J.V.: Greater Than the Sum of the Parts? Examining the Soundness of Collaborative Exams in Teacher Education Courses. Innovative Higher Education 28, 273 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Simkin, M.G.: An Experimental Study of the Effectiveness of Collaborative Testing in an Entry-Level Computer Programming Class. Journal of Information Systems Education 16, 273–280 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Falchikov, N., Goldfinch, J.: Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks. Review of Educational Research 70, 287–322 (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sluijsmans, D.M.A., Brand-Gruwel, S., Van Merriënboer, J., Bastiaens, T.R.: The Training of Peer Assessment Skills to Promote the Development of Reflection Skills in Teacher Education. Studies in Educational Evaluation 29, 23–42 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Topping, K.J.: Peer Assessment between Students in College and University. Review of Educational Research 68, 249–276 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tang, C.: Effects of Different Assessment Procedures on Tertiary Students’ Approaches to Studying, Unpublished PhD Thesis. The University of Hong Kong (1991)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tang, C.: Effects of Modes of Assessment on Students’ Preparation Strategies. In: Gibbs, G. (ed.) Improving Student Learning - Theory and Practice, Oxford Center for Staff Development, Oxford (1994)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Slavin, R.E.: Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1990)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bruffee, K.A.: Collaborative Learning: Higher Education. In: Interdependence and the Authority of Knowledge, 2nd edn., John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD (1999)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bloom, B.: A Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. D. McKay Co, New York (1956)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pimmel, R.L.: A Practical Approach for Converting Group Assignments into Team Projects. IEEE Transactions on Education 46, 273–282 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hathorn, L.G., Ingram, A.L.: Cooperation and Collaboration Using Computer-Mediated Communication. Journal of Educational Computing Research 26, 325–347 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Paulsen, D.: Leadership Essentials: Racilitation Skills for Improving Group Effectiveness, In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM SIGUCCS conference on User services (October 2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jia Shen
    • 1
  • Starr Roxanne Hiltz
    • 2
  • Michael Bieber
    • 2
  1. 1.New York Institute of Technology (The author will join Rider University in Sept. 2007) 
  2. 2.New Jersey Institute of Technology 

Personalised recommendations