The Design and Evaluation of a Diagonally Splitted Column to Improve Text Readability on a Small Screen

  • Yeon-Ji Kim
  • Woohun Lee
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4551)


Most previous studies comparing paper and computer screen readability show that screens are less readable than paper. There are many factors that could affect the readability of computer screens. However, exactly what factors reduce reading performance on computer screens is not clear. Therefore, this study has tried to find an alternative way to improve the readability of screen displays. A novel suggestion is designed to give readers sense of rhythm by diagonally dividing up screen areas. The diagonal division layout was read significantly faster (24.4%) than a normal layout for 5.5 inches display of e-Book readers. For 3.5 inches display, it was read 13.0% faster. The reason why the total reading time was cut down by the diagonal division layout is that the right-upper part played a decisive role. The number of texts on each line is systematically decreased in the right-upper part. 31.6% of total reading time was shorten by the right-upper part. However, there were no significant differences in subjective satisfaction between the two layout conditions.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Muter, P., Latremouille, S.A., Treurniet, W.C., Beam, P.: Extended reading of continuous text on television screens. Human Factors 24, 501–508 (1982)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gould, J.D., Grischkowsky, N.: Doing the same work with hard copy and with cathode ray tube(CRT) computer terminals. Human Factors 26, 323–337 (1984)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duchnicky, J.L., Kolers, P.A.: Readability of text scrolled on visual display terminals as a function of window size. Human Factors 25, 683–692 (1983)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weldon, L.J., Mills, C.B., Koved, L., Schneiderman, B.: The structure of information in online and paper technical manuals. In: proceedings of Human Factors Society-29th Annual Conference, Santa Monica, CA, pp. 1110–1113 (1985)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mills, C.B., Weldon, L.J.: Reading text from computer screens. ACM Computing Surveys 4, 329–358 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dyson, M.C., Kipping, G.J: The effects of line length and method of movement on patterns of reading from screen. Visible Language 32, 150–181 (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Horton, W.: Designing and writing online documentation: Help files to hypertext, John Wiley & Sons New York (1989)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Youngman, M., Scharff, L.: Text length and margin length influences on readability of GUIs. Southwest Psychological Association (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Trollip, S.R., Sales, G.: Readability of computer generated fill-justified text. Human Factors 28(2), 159–163 (1986)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yeon-Ji Kim
    • 1
  • Woohun Lee
    • 2
  1. 1.Human Interface Group, Mobile Handset R&D Center, LG Electronics Inc., P.O. Box 153-801, Gasan-dong, Gumchon-gu, SeoulKorea
  2. 2.Design Media Laboratory, Dept.of Industrial Design, KAIST(Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology), P.O. Box 305-701, KAIST, 373-1 Kusong-dong, Yusong-gu, DaejeonKorea

Personalised recommendations