Application of a Universal Design Evaluation Index to Mobile Phones

  • Miyeon Kim
  • Eui S. Jung
  • Sungjoon Park
  • Jongyong Nam
  • Jaeho Choe
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4551)


Universal design is considerably analogous to ergonomic design in a way that it takes the capabilities and limitations of users into consideration during the product development process. However, relatively few studies have been devoted to reflect the practical use of ergonomic principles on universal design. This research attempts to develop a universal design evaluation index for mobile phone design to quantify how well a product complies to the principles of universal design. The research also emphasizes on ergonomic principles as a basis of evaluation. A generation of the evaluation lists was done by cross-checking among the personal, activity and product components. Personal components consist of human characteristics including age, physique, perceptual capacity, life style, etc. Activity components were derived from the scenarios of mobile phone use while product components were composed of the parts to which a user interacts. A universal design index was generated systematically from the relationship matrices among the three components. The index was then used to test its suitability by applying it to the evaluation of mobile phones currently on the market. This study demonstrates a development process through which evaluations can be made possible for universal design. The research suggests an improved approach to the appraisal of how well mobile phones are universally designed based on ergonomic principles.


Universal design Mobile phone usability Evaluation process 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Null, R., Cherry, K.: Universal Design: Creative Solution for ADA Compliance, Professional Publications Inc. (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    UDRC.: Universal Design Principle. Universal Design Research Center, Busan (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tripod Design Co., Business Solution.: Design Assurance, Tokyo (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Preiser, W.F.E., et al.: Universal Design Handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    The Center for Universal Design, N.C. State University.: A Guide to Evaluating the Universal Design Performance of Products, The Center for Universal Design (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ministry of Information and Communication.: Status of Wire and Wireless Communication Service Scriber. Republic of Korea (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ministry of Health and Welfare.: Result report of disabled people’s actual condition. Republic of Korea (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nakagawa: Universal Design, Design Rockers (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kenji, M., et al.: Toyota’s program for universal design in vehicle development. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International conference on Inclusive Design, London (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ulrich, K.T., Eppinger, S.D.: Product Design and Development, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lund, A.M., Tschirgi, J.E.: Designing for People: Integrating Human Factors into the Product Realization Process. IEEE J. on Selected Areas in Communications 9(4), 496–500 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Broberg, O.: Integrating ergonomics in to the product development process. Int. J. Industrial Ergonomics 19, 317–327 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee, M.W., et al.: High Touch – an innovative scheme for new product development: case studies 1994-1998. Int. J. Industrial Ergonomics 27, 271–283 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Japanese Ergonomics Society.: The Universal Design Practical Guidelines, Kyoritsu Publishing Co. (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Iwarsson, S., Ståhl, A.: Accessibility, usability and universal design, Disability and Rehabilitation 25(2), 57–66 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vicente, K.J.: Cognitive work analysis: toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miyeon Kim
    • 1
  • Eui S. Jung
    • 1
  • Sungjoon Park
    • 2
  • Jongyong Nam
    • 1
  • Jaeho Choe
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Industrial Systems and Information Engineering, Korea University, Anam, Seongbuk, Seoul, 136-701Korea
  2. 2.Industrial and Information System Engineering, Namseoul University, 21 Maeju-ri, Seonghwan-eup, Chonan, 330-707Korea
  3. 3.Department of Industrial System Engineering, Daejin University, 11-1 Sondan-ri, Pochon-eup, Pochon, 487-711Korea

Personalised recommendations