Advertisement

When Does a Difference Make a Difference? A Snapshot on Global Icon Comprehensibility

  • Sonja Auer
  • Ester Dick
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4551)

Abstract

Global markets require global solutions, especially in user interface design. There are differences between cultures – but do those differences call for different icon designs? This paper provides a snapshot on icon comprehensibility in China, the US and Germany. The icon set was derived of an actual product to enable valid results. A web-based study with 135 participants from China, the US and Germany was conducted. Icon recognition rates among the Chinese participants were significantly lower than among US and German participants. Still, the mean rating for all three countries was above 69% and thus far removed from guesswork. Practical implications for global icon design are discussed based on these findings.

Keywords

Internationalization/Localization Icon Evaluation Icon Design User Interface Design Visual Design Quantitative Empirical User Studies 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Biederman, I.: Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review 94, 115–147 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boecker, M.: A Multiple Index Approach for the Evaluation of Pictograms and Icons. Computer Standards & Interfaces 18(2), 107–115 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Choong, Y.Y., Salvendy, G.: Design of Icons for Use by Chinese in Mainland China. Interacting with Computers 9(4), 417–430 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Del Galdo, E.: Internationalization and Translation: Some Guidelines for the Design of Human-Computer Interfaces. In: Nielsen, J. (ed.) Designing User Interfaces for International Use, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1990)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Evers, V., Day, D.: The Role of Culture in Interface Acceptance. In: Proc. INTERACT 1997, pp. 260–267. Chapman and Hall, Sydney, Australia (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI): ETR 070. Technical Report Human Factors (HF): The Multiple Index Approach (MIA) for the Evaluation of Pictograms. Valbonne (1993)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fernandes, T.: Global Interface Design. AP Professional, Chestnut Hill (1995)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gittins, D.: Icon-Based Human-Computer Interaction. International Journal of Human Machine Studies 24(6), 519–543 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Green, A.J.K., Barnard, P.J.: Iconic Interfacing: The Role of Icon Distinctiveness and Fixed or Variable Screen Locations. In: Proc. INTERACT 1990, pp. 457–462. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1990)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hall, E.: The Hidden Dimension. Anchor Books/ Doubleday, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hofstede, G.: Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Honold, P.: Learning How to Use a Cellular Phone: Comparison between German and Chinese Users. In: Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication 46(2), 196–205 (1999)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Horton, W.: The Icon Book. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Horton, W.: Designing Icons and Visual Symbols. In: Proc. CHI 1996, pp. 371–372. ACM Press, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    International Organisation for Standardisation: ISO/IEC 11581:2000 Icons. Geneva (2000)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jordan, P.: Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to the New Human Factors. Taylor and Francis, London (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lansdale, M.W.: On the Memorability of Icons in an Information Retrieval Task. Behaviour & Information Technology 7(2), 131–152 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marr, D.: Vision: The philosophy and the approach. W.H. Freeman, New York (1982)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    McDougall, S.J.P., Curry, M.B., de Bruijn, O.: The Effects of Visual Information on Users’ Mental Models: An Evaluation of Pathfinder Analysis as a Measure of Icon Usability. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics 5(1), 59–84 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Microsoft Official Guidelines for User Interface Developers and Designers: Localization, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnwue/html/ch15d.asp
  21. 21.
    Piamonte, D.P., Ohlsson, K., Abeysekera, J.D.A.: Evaluation Telecom Icons among Asian Countries. In: Proc. HCI (1) 1997, pp. 169–172. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1997)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rau, P.-L.P., Choong, Y.-Y., Salvendy, G.: A Cross-Cultural Study on Knowledge Representation and Structure in Human Computer Interfaces. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 34, 117–129 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rock, I., Palmer, S.: The legacy of Gestalt Psychology. Scientific American 263, 84–90 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rogers, Y.: Icons at the Interface: Their Usefulness. Interacting With Computers 1, 105–117 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Russo, P., Boor, S.: How Fluent is Your Interface? Designing for International Users. In: Proc. INTERCHI 1993, pp. 342–347. ACM Press, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Scarborough, J.: The Origins of Cultural Differences and their Impacts on Management. Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport (1998)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Smith, J.A., Siringo, M.P.: The Acceptability of Icons Across Countries. In: Proc. HCI (1) 1997, pp. 177–180. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1997)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sukaviriya, P., Moran, L.: User Interface for Asia. In: Nielsen, J. (ed.) Designing User Interfaces for International Use, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1990)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sun Guidelines: Planning for Internationalization and Localization, http://java.sun.com/products/jlf/ed2/book/HIG.Issues3.html
  30. 30.
    Wiedenbeck, S.: The Use of Icons and Labels in an End User Application Program: An Empirical Study of Learning and Retention. Behaviour and Information Technology 2, 68–82 (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sonja Auer
    • 1
  • Ester Dick
    • 2
  1. 1.Siemens AG, Power Transmission & Distribution, Humboldtstr. 59, 90459, NurembergGermany
  2. 2.Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, Otto-Hahn-Ring 6, 81739 MunichGermany

Personalised recommendations