Hip stress distribution may be a risk factor for avascular necrosis of femoral head

  • Veronika Kralj-Iglic
  • D. Dolinar
  • M. Ivanovski
  • I. List
  • M. Daniel
  • B. Mavcic
  • M. Tomsic
  • A. Iglic
  • Veronika Kralj-Iglic
Conference paper
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 16)


Avascular necrosis of femoral head (AN) is a hip disorder with various risk factors, however, the underlying mechanisms are not yet understood. In order to elucidate the effect of the mechanical factors on AN we have compared a group of hips at risk for AN and a group of healthy hips with respect to biomechanical parameters: functional angle of the weight bearing area (ϑF), position of the stress pole (Θ), index of the gradient of the contact stress at the lateral border of the load bearing area (Gp) and peak contact hip stress (pmax). The test group representing hips at risk for AN consisted of 32 male hips contralateral to the necrotic hips while the control group consisted of 46 healthy male hips. The biomechanical parameters we computed with the HIPSTRESS method (based on measurements of geometrical parameters from standard anterior-posterior pelvic radiographs). The average values of parameters pertaining to both groups were compared by the unpaired two-sided Student t-test. The functional angle of the weight bearing area was on the average larger (more favorable) in the control group (112.9º±13.5º) than in the test group (105.0º±12.4º), the difference (7%) being statistically significant (p < 0.01). The position of the stress pole was more lateral (less favorable) in the test group (15.44º±7.23º) than in the control group (11.80º±7.58º), the difference (27%) being statistically significant (p = 0.037). The index of the hip stress gradient was higher (less favorable) in the test group (-17.23º±17.16º x 103m-3) than in the control group (26.05±16.85 x 103m-3), the difference (40%) being statistically significant (p = 0.028) while we found no statistically significant difference in the peak contact stress between the two groups. Our results indicate that a less favorable steep stress distribution over a smaller load-bearing area is a risk factor in AN.


Femoral Head Contact Stress Avascular Necrosis Biomechanical Parameter Weight Bear Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Mont MA, Hungerford DS (1995) Non-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head. J Bone and Joint Surg 77-A:459469Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mahoney CR, Glesby MJ, DiCarlo EF, Peterson MG, Bostrom MP (2005) Total hip arthroplasty in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection: pathologic findings and surgical outcomes. Acta Orthop 76:198–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    JH, Aufranc OE (1972) Avascular necrosis of femoral head in the adult. A review of its incidence in a variety of conditions. Clin Orthop Rel Res 43–62Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kirk D (2002) High prevalence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head in HIV infected adults. Ann Int Med 137:17–25Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tektonidou MG, Malagari K, Vlachoyiannopoulos PG, Kelekis DA, Moutsopoulos HM (2003) Asymptomatic avascular necrosis in patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome in the absence of corticosteroid use: A prospective study by magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis and Rheumatism 48:732–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheng N, Burssens A, Mulier JC (1982) Pregnancy and postpregnancy avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 100:199–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Macdonald AG, Bissett JD (2001) Avascular necrosis of the femoral head in patients with prostate cancer treated with cyproterone acetate and radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 13:135–137Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bolland MJ, Hood G, Bastin ST, King AR, Grey A (2004) Bilateral femoral head osteonecrosis after septic shock and multiorgan failure. J Bone Mineral Res 19:517–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rollot F, Wechsler B, su Boutin le TH, De Gennes C, Amoura Z, Hachulla E, Piette JC (2005) Hemochromatosis and femoral head aseptic osteonecrosis: a nonfortuitous association. J Rheumatol 32:376–378Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim YM, Oh HC, Kim HJ (2000) The pattern of bone marrow oedema on MRI in osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg 82-B:837–841Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Iglic A, Srakar F, Antolic V (1993) Influence of the pelvic shape on the biomechanical status of the hip. Clin Biomech 8:223–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ipavec M, Brand RA, Pedersen DR, Mavcic B, Kralj-Iglic V, Iglic A (1999) Mathematical modelling of stress in the hip during gait. J Biomechanics 32:1229–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pompe B, Daniel M, Sochor M, Vengust R, Kralj-Iglic V, Iglic A (2003) Gradient of contact stress in normal and dysplastic human hips. Medical Eng Phys 25:379–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vengust R, Daniel M, Antolic V, Zupanc O, Iglic A, Kralj- Iglic V (2001) Biomechanical evaluation of hip joint after Salter innominate osteotomy: a long-term follow-up study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121:511–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mavcic B, Pompe B, Antolic V, Daniel M, Iglic A, Kralj-Iglic V (2002) Mathematical estimation of stress distribution in normal and dysplastic human hips. J Orthop Res 20:10251030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mavcic B, Slivnik T, Antolic V, Iglic A, Kralj-Iglic V (2004) High contact stress is related to the development of hip pathology with increasing age. Clin Biomech 19:939–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kralj M, Mavcic B, Antolic V, Iglic A, Kralj-Iglic V (2005) The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy: clinical, radiographic and biomechanical 7–15 year follow-up in 26 hips. Acta Orthop 76:833–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dolinar D, Antolic V, Herman S, Iglic A, Kralj-Iglic V, Pavlovcic V (2003) Influence of contact hip stress on the outcome of surgical treatment of hips affected by avascular necrosis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 123:509–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dostal WF, Andrews JG (1981) A three-dimensional biomechanical model of the hip musculature. J Biomech 14:803–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brinckmann P, Frobin W, Hierholzer E (1981) Stress on the articular surface of the hip joint in healthy adults and persons with idiopathic osteoarthrosis of the hip joint. J Biomech 14: 149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Daniel M, Antolic V, Iglic A, Kralj Iglic V (2001) Determination of contact hip stress from nomograms based on mathematical model. Med Eng Phys 23:347–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gangji V, Hauzeur JP, Schoutens A, Hisenkamp M, Appelboom T, Egrise D (2003) Abnormalities in the replicative capacity of osteoblastic cells in the proximal femur of patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Rheumatol 30:348351Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Veronika Kralj-Iglic
    • 1
  • D. Dolinar
    • 2
  • M. Ivanovski
    • 1
  • I. List
    • 1
  • M. Daniel
    • 3
  • B. Mavcic
    • 2
  • M. Tomsic
    • 4
  • A. Iglic
    • 5
  • Veronika Kralj-Iglic
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Biophysics, Faculty of MedicineUni-LjLjubljanaSlovenia
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity Medical Center LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia
  3. 3.Technical University KosiceKosiceSlovakia
  4. 4.Department of RheumatologyUniversity Medical Center LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia
  5. 5.Faculty of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations