Advertisement

Report on the Impact of a User-Centered Approach and Usability Studies for Designing Mobile and Context-Aware Cognitive Orthosis

  • Blandine Paccoud
  • David Pache
  • Hélène Pigot
  • Sylvain Giroux
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4541)

Abstract

To foster the mobility of people with cognitive impairements, cognitive orthoses on mobile devices can have a major impact on patients and caregivers quality of life. But patient and caregivers must be implied in the process of design such orthoses. In this paper we describe an iterative process relying on a user-centered approach. On the one hand, it enabled to improve the design and usability of an existing mobile cognitive orthosis. On the other hand, it provide invaluable clues and hints to new context-aware features. Caregivers and patients were deeply involved in the process and two studies were conducted in a real setting with people with schizophrenia and people with head traumas.

Keywords

Usability Study General Packet Radio Service Impaired People Cerebral Vascular Accident Activity Recall 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Carmien, S.: End user programming and context responsiveness in handheld prompting systems for persons with cognitive disabilities and caregivers. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’05, Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1252–1255, présentation de MAPS (April 2-7, 2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Giroux, S., Pigot, H., Mayers, A.: Indoors pervasive computing and outdoors mobile computing for assisted cognition and telemonitoring. In: Computers Helping People with Special Needs, vol. 31, pp. 953–960. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Giroux, S., Pigot, H., Moreau, J.-F., Savary, J.-P.: Distributed mobile services and interfaces for people suffering from cognitive deficits pp, 544–554. Ismail Khalil Ibrahim (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hersh, N., Treadgold, L.: Neuropage: the rehabilitation of memory dysfunction by prosthetic memory and cueing. Neurorehabilitation 4, 465–486 (1994)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jokela, T., Iivari, N., Matero, J., Karukka, M.: The standard of user-centered design and the standard definition of usability: analyzing ISO 13407 against ISO 9241-11. In: CLIHC ’03: Proceedings of the Latin American conference on Human-computer interaction, pp. 53–60. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim, H.J., Burke, D.T., Dowds, M.M., Georges, J.: Utility of a microcomputer as an external memory aid for a memory-impaired head injury patient during in-patient rehabilitation. Brain Injury, vol. 13(2), pp. 147–150, Premiers test cliniques avec un PDA comme orthése cognitive (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Levinson, R.: A custon-fitting cognitive orthotic that provides automatic planning and cueing assistance. In: Technology and Persons with Disabilitites Conference, Présentation littéraire des aspect planification de PEAT (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McGrenere, J., Sullivan, J., Baecker, R.M.: Designing technology for people with cognitive impairments. In: CHI ’06: CHI ’06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 1635–1638. ACM Press, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Patterson, D.J., Liao, L., Gajos, K., Collier, M., Livic, N., Olson, K., Wang, S., Fox, D., Kautz, H.: Opportunity knocks: A system to provide cognitive assistance with transportation services. In: Davies, N., Mynatt, E.D., Siio, I. (eds.) UbiComp 2004. LNCS, vol. 3205, pp. 433–450. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pigot, H., Giroux, S.: Keeping in touch with cognitively impaired people: How mobile devices can improve medical and cognitive supervision. IOS Press, Amsterdam (September 15–17, 2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pigot, H., Savary, J.P., Metzger, J.L., Rochon, A., Beaulieu, M.: Advanced technology guidelines to fulfill the needs of the cognitively impaired population. In: Giroux, S., Pigot, H. (eds.) 3rd International Conference On Smart Homes and health Telematic (ICOST), July 4-6, 2005. Assistive Technology Research Series, pp. 25–32. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M.E. Pollack.: Assistive technology for aging populations. In: Special committee on aging united states senate (2004) note: http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~pollackm/Pollack-web˙files/senate-testi% mony.pdf
  13. 13.
    Vredenburg, K., Mao, J., Smith, P.W., Carey, T.: A survey of user-centered design practice. In: CHI ’02: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 471–478. ACM Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Blandine Paccoud
    • 1
  • David Pache
    • 1
  • Hélène Pigot
    • 1
  • Sylvain Giroux
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire DOMUS, université de Sherbrooke, QcCanada

Personalised recommendations