Skip to main content

A Paradoxical Aspect of Auditory Change Detection

  • Conference paper

The auditory entities to which human listeners attach meaning are generally combinations of successive and spectrally different sounds rather than static acoustic features. Thus, an important task of the brain is to connect, or bind, successive sounds. When several sound sources are concomitantly active, the connections must of course be selective. It appears that connections are established on the basis of automatic rules, in particular a rule of spectral proximity (Bregman 1990). This can lead, for instance, to the perception of a melodic “motion” between successive tones mixed or interleaved with other tones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bregman AS (1990) Auditory scene analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosch M, Schreiner CE (2000) Sequence sensitivity of neurons in cat primary auditory cortex. Cereb Cortex 10:1155–1167.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Demany L, Ramos C (2005) On the binding of successive sounds: perceiving shifts in nonperceived pitches. J Acoust Soc Am 117:833–841.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lüscher E, Zwislocki J (1949) Adaptation of the ear to sound stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 21:135–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macmillan NA, Creelman CD (1991) Detection theory: a user’s guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna TM, Weinberger NM, Diamond DM (1989) Responses of single auditory cortical neurons to tone sequences. Brain Res 481:142–153.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Micheyl C, Tian B, Carlyon RP, Rauschecker JP (2005) Perceptual organization of tone sequences in the auditory cortex of awake macaques. Neuron 48:139–148.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman S (1978) Two-dimensionality of the correspondence process in apparent motion. Perception 7:683–693.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Noorden LPAS (1975) Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences. Doctoral dissertation, Technische Hogeschool, Eindhoven.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Demany, L., Ramos, C. (2007). A Paradoxical Aspect of Auditory Change Detection. In: Kollmeier, B., et al. Hearing – From Sensory Processing to Perception. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73009-5_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics