Skip to main content

Telesurgery in Urology

  • Chapter
Telesurgery
  • 1038 Accesses

Abstract

As is the case with other surgical specialties, urologic practice has witnessed major breakthroughs throughout its history. Achievements such as the introduction of anesthesia in the 1840s and that of introducing penicillin in the 1940s have had a profound and lasting affect on the way urology is practiced. It is on this very same note that the revolution in information technology has to be seen, as current advances will undoubtedly again alter urology as we now know it. These exciting new frontiers have been made possible by the rapid expansion of the Internet, development in telecommunication infrastructures, an ever-multiplying computing power, and the increasing sophistication of robotics. Consequently, telesurgical urology became an inevitability, dictated not only by the incipient possibility but also by needs and necessities inherent to the specialty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  •  1. Bauer J, Lee BR, Stoianovici D et al (2001) Remote percutaneous renal access using a new automated telesurgical robotic system. Telemed J E Health 7:341–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  •  2. Bove P Stoianovici D, Micali S et al (2003) Is telesurgery a new reality? Our experience with laparoscopic and percutaneous procedures. J Endourol 17:137–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  •  3. Buckingham RA, Buckingham RO (1995) Robots in operating theatres. BMJ 311:1479–1482

    Google Scholar 

  •  4. Chinzei K, Miller K (2001) Towards MRI-guided surgical manipulator. Med Sci Monit 7:153–163

    Google Scholar 

  •  5. Davies B (2001) A review of robotics in surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 214:129–140

    Google Scholar 

  •  6. Davies BL, Hibberd RD, Coptcoat MJ et al (1989) A surgeon robot prostatectomy–a laboratory evaluation. J Med Eng Technol 13:273–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  •  7. Dimaio SP, Pieper S, Chinzei K et al (2006) Robot-assisted needle placement in open-MRI: system architecture, integration and validation. Stud Health Technol Inform 119:126–131

    Google Scholar 

  •  8. Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Novara G (2006) Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 51:45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  •  9. Fichtinger G, Deweese TL, Patriciu A et al (2002) System for robotically assisted prostate biopsy and therapy with intraoperative CT guidance. Acad Radiol 9:60–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fichtinger G, Burdette EC, Tanacs A et al (2006) Robotically assisted prostate brachytherapy with transrectal ultrasound guidance–phantom experiments. Brachytherapy 5:14–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris SJ, Arambula-Cosio F, Mei Q Et Al (1997) The Probot–an active robot for prostate resection. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 211:317–325

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ho G, Ng WS, Teo MY et al (2001) Experimental Study of transurethral robotic laser resection of the prostate using the Lasertrode Lightguide. J Biomed Opt 6:244–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janetschek G, Bartsch G, Kavoussi LR (1998) Transcontinental interactive laparoscopic telesurgery between the United States and Europe. J Urol 160:1413

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaul S, Laungani R, Sarle R et al (2007) da Vinci-assisted robotic partial nephrectomy: technique and results at a mean of 15 months of follow-up. Eur Urol 51:186–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee BR, Bishoff JT, Janetschek G et al (1998) A novel method of surgical instruction: international telementoring. World J Urol 16:367–370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee BR, Png DJ, Liew L et al (2000) Laparoscopic telesurgery between the United States and Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore 29:665–668

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Link RE, Schulam PG, Kavoussi LR (2001) Telesurgery: remote monitoring and assistance during laparoscopy. Urol Clin North Am 28:177–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M et al (2001) Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 413:379–380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marescaux J, Leroy J, Rubino F et al (2002) Transcontinental robot-assisted remote telesurgery: feasibility and potential applications. Ann Surg 235:487–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B et al (2002) Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute Experience. Urology 60:864–868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moinzadeh A, Gill IS (2004) Robotic adrenalectomy. Urol Clin North Am 31:753–756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muntener M, Ursu D, Patriciu A et al (2006) Robotic prostate surgery. Expert Rev Med Devices 3:575–584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nag S, Beyer D, Friedland J et al (1999) American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) recommendations for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44:789–799

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nambirajan T, Jeschke S, Al Zahrani H et al (2004) Prospective, randomized controlled study: transperitoneal laparoscopic versus retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy. Urology 64:919–924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nathoo N, Cavusoglu MC, Vogelbaum MA et al (2005) In touch with robotics: neurosurgery for the future. Neurosurgery 56:421–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen LH, Jorgensen TM (2004) Computer-assisted pyeloplasty in children: the retroperitoneal approach. J Urol 171:2629–2631

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen LH, Deding D, Yeung CK et al (2003) Computer assisted laparoscopic pneumovesical ureter reimplantation a.m. Cohen: initial experience in a pig model. Apmis Suppl 109:23–25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rassweiler J, Binder J, Frede T (2001) Robotics and telesurgery: will they change our future? Curr Opin Urol 11:309–320

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rassweiler J, Safi KC, Subotic S et al (2005) Robotics and telesurgery–an update on their position in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14:109–122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Razdan S, Bagley DH, Mcginnis DE (2005) Minimizing minimally invasive surgery: the 5-mm trocar laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol 19:533–536

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rovetta A (1999) Tests on reliability of a prostate biopsy telerobotic system. Stud Health Technol Inform 62:302–307

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rovetta A, Sala R (1995) Execution of robot-assisted biopsies within the clinical context. J Image Guid Surg 1:280–287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sala LG, Matsunaga GS, Corica FA et al (2006) Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy and totally intracorporeal ileal neobladder. J Endourol 20:233–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Satava RM (1999) Emerging technologies for surgery in the 21st century. Arch Surg 134:1197–1202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schiff J, Li PS, Goldstein M (2004) Robotic microsurgical vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: a prospective randomized study in a rat model. J Urol 171:1720–1725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Su LM, Stoianovici D, Jarrett TW et al (2002) Robotic percutaneous access to the kidney: comparison with standard manual access. J Endourol 16:471–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Varkarakis IM, Rais-Bahrami S, Kavoussi LR et al (2005) Robotic surgery and telesurgery in urology. Urology 65:840–846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner AA, Varkarakis IM, Link RE et al (2006) Comparison of surgical performance during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy of two robotic camera holders, EndoAssist and AESOP: a pilot study. Urology 68:70–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rawashdeh, Y., Olsen, H. (2008). Telesurgery in Urology. In: Kumar, S., Marescaux, J. (eds) Telesurgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72999-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72999-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72998-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72999-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics