A Semantic Web Service Oriented Framework for Adaptive Learning Environments

  • Stefan Dietze
  • Alessio Gugliotta
  • John Domingue
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4519)


The current state of the art in supporting e-learning objectives is primarily based on providing a learner with learning content by using metadata standards. Due to this approach, several issues have to be taken into account – e. g. limited re-usability across different standards and learning contexts and high development costs. To overcome these issues, this paper describes an innovative semantic web service-oriented framework aimed at changing this data- and metadata-based paradigm to a highly dynamic service-oriented approach. Instead of providing a learner with static data, our approach is based on fulfilling learning objectives based on a dynamic supply of services. Therefore, we introduce a semantic layer architecture to abstract from existing learning data as well as process metadata standards by using Semantic Web Service (SWS) technology. Furthermore, our approach is based on abstract and reusable learning process models describing a learning process semantically as a composition of learning goals. Based on the formal semantic descriptions of learning goals as well as web services, services appropriate to achieve a specific learning goal can be selected, composed and invoked dynamically. This supports a high level of re-usability since a dynamic adaptation to different learning contexts and requirements of individual learners is achieved while utilizing standard-compliant learning applications. To illustrate the application of our approach, we describe a prototypical implementation utilizing the introduced approach based on the SWS framework WSMO.


Semantic Web Services Service oriented Architecture WSMO E-Learning IRS III IMS Learning Design 


  1. 1.
    Advanced Distributed Learning (ADL) SCORM 2004 Specification (2004),
  2. 2.
    Amorim, R.R., Lama, M., Sánchez, E., Riera, A., Vila, X.A.: A Learning Design Ontology based on the IMS Specification. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 9(1), 38–57 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baldoni, M., Baroglio, C., Patti, V., Torasso, L.: Using a rational agent in an adaptive web-based tutoring system. In: Proc. of the Workshop on Adaptive Systems for Web-Based Education, 2nd Int. Conf. on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-based Systems, Malaga, Spain, pp. 43–55 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baldoni, M., Baroglio, C., Brunkhorst, I., Henze, N., Marengo, E., Patti, V.: A Personalization Service for Curriculum Planning. In: ABIS 2006 - 14th Workshop on Adaptivity and User Modeling in Interactive Systems, Hildesheim, October 9-11, 2006, pp. 2006–2014 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cabral, L., Domingue, J., Galizia, S., Gugliotta, A., Tanasescu, V., Pedrinaci, C., Norton, B.: IRS-III: A Broker for Semantic Web Services Based Applications. In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Allemang, D., Preist, C., Schwabe, D., Mika, P., Uschold, M., Aroyo, L.M. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 201–214. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Collis, B., Strijker, A.: Technology and Human Issues in Reusing Learning Objects. Journal of Interactive Media in Education (Special Issue on the Educational Semantic Web) 4 (2004),
  7. 7.
    Domingue, J., Motta, E., Corcho Garcia, O.: Knowledge Modelling in WebOnto and OCML: A User Guide (1999), available from
  8. 8.
    Dolog, P., Henze, N., Nejdl, W., Sintek, M.: Personalization in Distributed elearning Environments. In: Proc. Of WWW2004 – The 13th international World Wide Web Conference (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Duval, E.: 1484.12.1 IEEE Standard for learning Object Metadata. IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee (2002),
  10. 10.
    Fischer, G., Ostwald, J.: Knowledge Management: Problems, Promises, Realities, and Challenges. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(1), 60–72 (2001), CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gangemi, A., Mika, P.: Understanding the Semantic Web through Descriptions and Situations. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Schmidt, D.C., et al. (eds.) CoopIS 2003, DOA 2003, and ODBASE 2003. LNCS, vol. 2888, pp. 689–706. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, A., Schneider, L.: Sweetening Ontologies with DOLCE. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, p. 166. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Henze, N.: Personalized e-Learning in the Semantic Web (Extended version of 4). Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) 1(1) (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Henze, N., Dolog, P., Nejdl, W.: Reasoning and Ontologies for Personalized E-Learning. Educational Technology & Society 7(4) (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    IMS Learning Design Specification,
  16. 16.
    Knight, C., Gašević, D., Richards, G.: An Ontology-Based Framework for Bridging Learning Design and Learning Content. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 9(1), 23–37 (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Koper, R.: Use of the Semantic Web to Solve Some Basic Problems in Education: Increase Flexible, Distributed Lifelong Learning, Decrease Teacher’s Workload. Journal of Interactive Media in Education (Special Issue on the Educational Semantic Web) 6 (2004),
  18. 18.
    LUISA Project - Learning Content Management System Using Innovative Semantic Web Services Architecture,
  19. 19.
    Naeve, A., Sicilia, M.A.: Learning Processes and processing learning: from organizational needs to learning designs. In: ADALE workshop at the Adaptive Hypermedia conference, Dublin, June 20-23 (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Open Learn Project: Online Educational Resources,
  21. 21.
    Reload Project,
  22. 22.
    Schmidt, A., Winterhalter, C.: User Context Aware Delivery of E-Learning Material: Approach and Architecture. Journal of Universal Computer Science (JUCS) 10(1) (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schmidt, A.: Bridging the Gap Between Knowledge Management and E-Learning with Context-Aware Corporate Learning. In: Althoff, K.-D., Dengel, A., Bergmann, R., Nick, M., Roth-Berghofer, T.R. (eds.) WM 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3782, pp. 203–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Simon, B., Dolog, P., Miklós, Z., Olmedilla, D., Sintek, M.: Conceptualising Smart Spaces for Learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education (Special Issue on the Educational Semantic Web) 9 (2004),
  25. 25.
    SUPER – Semantics Utilized for Process Management within and between Enterprises,
  26. 26.
    WSMO Working Group, D2v1.0: Web Service Modeling Ontology (WSMO). WSMO Working Draft (2004),

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Dietze
    • 1
  • Alessio Gugliotta
    • 1
  • John Domingue
    • 1
  1. 1.Knowledge Media Institute, Open University, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AAUK

Personalised recommendations