Advertisement

Developing Ontologies for Collaborative Engineering in Mechatronics

  • Violeta Damjanović
  • Wernher Behrendt
  • Manuela Plößnig
  • Merlin Holzapfel
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4519)

Abstract

Creating a coherent set of ontologies to support a collaborative design process amongst different firms which develop mechatronic products is a challenge due to the semantic heterogeneity of the underlying domain models and the amount of domain knowledge that needs to be covered. We tackle the problem of semantic heterogeneity by employing the DOLCE foundational ontology and by aligning our models to it. We approach the problem of scale, i.e. the amount of knowledge modeled by keeping the models at a descriptive level which is still granular enough to connect them with domain and task specific engineering tools. In order to manage the complexity of the modeling task we separate the models into the foundational layer, the mechatronic layer consisting of three domain ontologies, one process model and one cross-domain model, and the collaborative application layer. For the development process, we employ a methodology for dynamic ontology creation, which moves from taxonomical structures to formal models.

Keywords

Unify Modeling Language Domain Ontology Engineering Domain Collaborative Engineering Reference Ontology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    DynamOnt Deliverable 201: First specification of Methodology and Workbench for Dynamic Ontology Creation (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thramboulidis, K.: Model Integrated Mechatronics – Towards a new Paradigm in the Development of Manufacturing Systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 1(1), 54–61 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yoshioka, M.: Physical Concept Ontology for the Knowledge Intensive Engineering Framework. Advanced Engineering Informatics 18(2), 95–113 (2004)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Devedzić, V.: Understading Ontological Engineering. Communications of the ACM 45(4), 136–144 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heverhagen, T., Tracht, R.: Using Stereotypes of the Unified Modeling Language in Mechatronic Systems. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Information Technology in Mechatronics, ITM’01, Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 333–338 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bradley, D.: What is Mechatronic and Why Teach It? International Journal of Engineering Education (2004), Online: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3792/is_200410/ai_n10298146/g_1 (Last access: 2007-03-13)
  7. 7.
    Gero, J.S., Maher, M.L.: A Framework for Research in Design Computing. In: Martens, B., Linzer, H., Voigt, A. (eds.) ECAADE’97, Osterreichischer Kunst und Kulturverlag, Vienna (1997), Online: http://people.arch.usyd.edu.au/~john/publications/1997/ecaade/index.html (Last Access: 2007-03-13)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Masolo, C., Borgo, S., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N.: Ontology Library. WonderWeb Deliverable D18 (2004), Online: http://wonderweb.semanticweb.org/deliverables/documents/D18.pdf (Last access: 2006-10-23)
  9. 9.
    Gangemi, A., Borgo, S., Catenacci, C., Lehmann, J.: Task Taxonomies for Knowledge Content. METOKIS Deliverable D07 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mika, P., Oberle, D., Gangemi, A., Sabou, M.: Foundations for Service Ontologies: Aligning OWL-S to DOLCE. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web 2004, pp. 563–572 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nagypál, G.: Methodology for Building SWS Ontologies in DIP. DIP Deliverable D3.11 (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fernández, M., Gómez-Pérez, A., Juristo, N.: METHONTOLOGY: From Ontological Art towards Ontological Engineering. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symp. Series, pp. 33–40. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1997)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sofia Pinto, H., Staab, S., Tempich, C.: DILIGENT: Towards a Fine-Grained Methodology for Distributed, Loosely-controlled and Evolving Engineering of Ontologies. In: Proceedings of the ECAI 2004, pp. 393–397 (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zaremba, M., Moran, M., Haselwanter, T., Lee, H.-K.: WSMX Architecture. WSMX Deliverable D13.4 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Violeta Damjanović
    • 1
  • Wernher Behrendt
    • 1
  • Manuela Plößnig
    • 1
  • Merlin Holzapfel
    • 1
  1. 1.Salzburg Research, Jakob Haringer Strasse 5/II, 5020 SalzburgAustria

Personalised recommendations