Accessibility of Interactive Television for Users with Low Vision: Learning from the Web

  • Mark V Springett
  • Richard N Griffiths
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4471)


Contemporary developments in digital and interactive television in the UK are reviewed to assess their accessibility implications for viewer/users with low vision. Of particular significance is the likelihood of divergence between sectors of the population receiving digital television in an enhanced form through new broadband distribution (thin client) technology and those remaining with older broadcast set-top-box (thick client) technology, comprising proportionately more visually disabled viewers. With this second segment particularly in mind, and utilising findings from our previous research with visually disabled people, we examine the applicability of the W3C web accessibility guidelines to interactive television. We conclude that, while technical limitations may prevent their wholesale adoption, guidelines relating to the display of interactive features, and brightness and contrast may be directly interpreted for this medium, whilst other guidelines involving magnification and audio equivalence and feedback are highly relevant and should inform technical developments in set-top box functionality.


Accessibility Low vision Guidelines IDTV Set-top boxes 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Chorianopoulos, K., Lekakos, G., Spinellis, D.: The virtual channel model for personalized television. In: Proc. the 1st European interactive television conference (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cringeon, S., Benyon, D., Leplatre, G.: Exploration of personality rich mobile comanions. In: Proc. of Human-Animated Character Interaction Workshop (2005),
  3. 3.
    Freeman, J., et al.: Easy TV 2002 Research Report. ITC and Consumer’s Association (2003), available online
  4. 4.
    Gill, J., Perera, S.: Accessible universal design of interactive digital television. In: Proceedings of 1st EuroITV Conference.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hamilton, F., Petrie, H., Carmichael, A.: The VISTA Project: universal access to electronic programme guides for digital TV. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Proceedings of HCI International, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Islington Borough Council UK, Implementing electronic government: return (2004),
  7. 7.
    Klein, J., Simon, K., Sinclair, K.: Attitudes to Digital Television. Preliminary findings on consumer adoption of Digital Television. (2004),
  8. 8.
    Nielsen, J., Molich, R.: Improving a Human-Computer Dialogue. Communications of the ACM (March 1990)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Office of national statistics (UK) (2006),
  10. 10.
    Reason, J.: Human Error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rice, M., Fels, D.: Low vision the visual interface for interactive television. In: Masthoff, J., Griffiths, R., Pemberton, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Interactive television (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rice, M.: A study of television and visual impairment: Prospects for the accessibility of interactive television. In: Masthoff, J., Griffiths, R., Pemberton, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1st European interactive television conference (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cereijo Roibas, A., et al.: Beyond the remote control: Going the extra mile to enhance iTV access via mobile devices & humanizing navigation experience for those with special needs. In: Jensen, J. (ed.) User-Centred ITV Systems, Programmes and Applications: Proceedings of EuroITV 2005, Aalborg University, 30 March – 1 April (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Springett, M., Griffiths, R.: The use of stalking-horse evaluation prototypes for probing DTV accessibility requirements. To appear in, Interactive Digital Television: technologies and applications, IGI press (in press)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tanton, N.E., Ware, T., Armstrong, M.: Audio Description: what it is and how it works (2006),
  16. 16.,
  17. 17.
    W3C Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0 (1999),

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark V Springett
    • 1
  • Richard N Griffiths
    • 2
  1. 1.Interaction Design Centre, Middlesex University, Ravensfield House, The Burroughs, London, NW4 4BEUK
  2. 2.University of Brighton, School of Computing, Mathematical & Information Sciences, Watts Building, Moulsecoomb, Brighton, BN2 4GJUK

Personalised recommendations