Advertisement

Period Models, Continuous Time and Applied Macrodynamics

Chapter
Part of the Dynamic Modeling and Econometrics in Economics and Finance book series (DMEF, volume 10)

In this chapter, and we reconsider the issue of the (non-)equivalence of period and continuous time analysis. We stress here that period models—the now dominant model type in the macrodynamic literature—assume a single (uniformly applied) lag length for all markets, which therefore act in a completely synchronized manner. In view of this, we start in Sect. 1.2 from the methodological precept that period and continuous time representations of the same macrostructure should give rise to the same qualitative outcome, i.e., that the qualitative results of period analysis should not depend on the length of the period, see Foley (1975) for an earlier statement of this precept, as well as Medio (1991) and Sims (1998) for related observations. A simple example where this is fulfilled is given by the conventional Solow growth model, considered in Sect. 1.3, while all chaotic period dynamics of dimension less than 3 are in conflict with this precept, see however Medio (1991a) for routes to chaos in such an environment.

Keywords

Continuous Time Chaotic Dynamic Real Wage Chaotic Attractor Period Length 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asada, T., Chiarella, C., Flaschel, P. and Franke, R. (2003). Open Economy Macrodynamics. An Integrated Disequilibrium Approach. Heidelberg: Springer. Google Scholar
  2. Asada, T., Chen, P., Chiarella, C. and Flaschel, P. (2006). “Keynesian Dynamics and the Wage-Price Spiral. A baseline disequilibrium model.” Journal of Macroeconomics, 28, 90–130. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asada, T., Flaschel, P., Proaño, C. and Groh, G. (2007). Continuous time, period analysis and chaos from an empirical perspective. CEM Working Paper 144, Bielefeld University. Google Scholar
  4. Becker, S., Grüne, L. and Semmler, W. (2007). “Comparing accuracy of second-order approximation and dynamic programming.” Computational Economics, 30(1), 65–91. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, P. (1988). “Empirical and theoretical evidence on economic chaos.” System Dynamics Review, 4, 1–38. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, P., Chiarella, C., Flaschel, P. and Hung, H. (2007). Keynesian disequilibrium dynamics: Estimated convergence, roads to instability and the emergence of complex business fluctuations. University of Technology, Sydney: Working paper. Google Scholar
  7. Chiarella, C. and Flaschel, P. (2000). The Dynamics of Keynesian Monetary Growth: Macro Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  8. Chiarella, C., Flaschel, P. and Franke, R. (2005). Foundations for a Disequilibrium Theory of the Business Cycle. Qualitative Analysis and Quantitative Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  9. Flaschel, P. (1993). “Macrodynamics. Income Distribution, Effective Demand and Cyclical Growth.” Bern: Verlag Peter Lang. Google Scholar
  10. Foley, D. (1975). “On two specifications of asset equilibrium in macro-economic model.” Journal of Political Economy, 83, 305–324. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gandolfo, G. (1996). Economic Dynamics (3rd ed.). Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
  12. Goodwin, R.M. (1967). A Growth Cycle. In: C.H. Feinstein (ed.), Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 54–58. Google Scholar
  13. Guckenheimer, J. and Holmes, P. (1983). Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. Heidelberg: Springer. Google Scholar
  14. Hirsch, M.W. and Smale, S. (1974). Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems, and Linear Algebra. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
  15. Invernizzi, S. and Medio, A. (1991). “On lags and chaos in economic dynamic models.” Journal of Mathematical Economics, 29, 521–551. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kalecki, M. (1935). “A macro-dynamic theory of business cycles.” Econometrica, 3, 327–344. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keynes, J.M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. New York: Macmillan. Google Scholar
  18. Medio, A. (1991a). “Discrete and continuous-time models of chaotic dynamics in economics.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2, 99–118. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Medio, A. (1991b). “Continuous-time models of chaos in economics.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 16, 115–151, 521–551. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pampel, T. (2005). On the convergence of balanced growth in continuous time. Faculty of Economics, Bielefeld University: Discussion Paper 538. Google Scholar
  21. Sims, C. (1998). “Stickiness.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 49, 317–356. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Soliman, A.S. (1996). “Transitions from stable equilibrium points to periodic cycles to chaos in a Philips curve system.” Journal of Macroeconomics, 18, 139–153. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Solow, R. (1956). “A contribution to the theory of economic growth.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65–94. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tobin, J. (1982). “Money and finance in the macroeconomic process.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 14, 171–204. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wiggins, S. (1990). Introduction to Applied Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Chaos. Heidelberg: Springer. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Personalised recommendations