Skip to main content

Evaluation Method for Decision Rule Sets

  • Conference paper
Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, Data Mining and Granular Computing (RSFDGrC 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4482))

Abstract

In this paper, a decision table in rough set theory is classified into three types according to its consistency. Three parameters α (whole certainty measure), β (whole consistency measure) and γ (whole support measure) are introduced to evaluate the performance of a decision rule set induced from a decision table. For three types of decision tables, the dependency of the parameters upon condition/decision granulation is analyzed. The parameters can be used to construct an evaluation function in favor of selecting a better one from some different rule acquiring methods for real decision problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Science 11, 341–356 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bazan, J., et al.: Rough set approach to pattern extraction from classifiers. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 82(4), 1–10 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Pawlak, Z., Skowron, A.: Rudiments of rough sets. Information Sciences 177, 3–27 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Pawlak, Z., Skowron, A.: Rough sets: some extensions. Information Sciences 177, 28–40 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Pawlak, Z., Skowron, A.: Rough sets and boolean reasoning. Information Sciences 177, 41–73 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Pal, S.K., et al.: Presenting the special isssue on rough-neuro computing. Neurocomputing 36, 1–3 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pawlak, Z.: Some remarks on conflict analysis. Information Sciences 166, 649–654 (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Skowron, A., Rauszer, C.: The discernibility matrices and functions in information systems. In: Slowiński, R. (ed.) Intelligent Decision Support, Handbook of Applications and Advances of the Rough Sets Theory, pp. 331–362. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Komorowski, J., et al.: Rough sets: a tutuorial. In: Pal, S.K., Skowron, A. (eds.) Rough Fuzzy Hubridization: A New Trend in Decision Making, pp. 3–98. Springer, Singapore (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Qian, Y.H., Liang, J.Y.: Combination entropy and combination granulation in incomplete information system. In: Wang, G.-Y., et al. (eds.) RSKT 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4062, pp. 184–190. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Yao, Y.Y.: Probabilistic approaches to rough sets. Expert Systems 20(5), 287–297 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Slezak, D.: Various approaches to reasoning with frequency based decision reducts: a survey. In: Polkowski, L., Tsumoto, S., Lin, T.Y. (eds.) Rough set methods and applications, pp. 235–285. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Düntsch, I., Gediaga, G.: Uncertainty measures of rough set prediction. Artificial Intelligence 106(1), 109–137 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Huynh, V.N., Nakamori, Y.: A roughness measure for fuzzy sets. Information Sciences 173, 255–275 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Liang, J.Y., Li, D.Y.: Uncertainty and Knowledge Acquisition in Information Systems. Science Press, Beijing (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, W.X., et al.: Theory and Method of Rough Sets. Science Press, Beijing (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yao, J.T., Yao, Y.Y.: Induction of classification rules by granular computing. In: Alpigini, J.J., et al. (eds.) RSCTC 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2475, pp. 331–338. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Liang, J.Y., Shi, Z.Z., Li, D.Y.: The information entropy, rough entropy and knowledge granulation in rough set theory. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 12(1), 37–46 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Qian, Y., Liang, J. (2007). Evaluation Method for Decision Rule Sets. In: An, A., Stefanowski, J., Ramanna, S., Butz, C.J., Pedrycz, W., Wang, G. (eds) Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, Data Mining and Granular Computing. RSFDGrC 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4482. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72530-5_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72530-5_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72529-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72530-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics