Abstract
The climate on our earth has always been in a state of flux. It has, for instance, exhibited dramatic cycles of glacier movements in the past and it will continue to change in the future. Human beings have — with more or less success — adjusted themselves to such changes, and this has prompted creative survival strategies with far reaching social-economic and geographical implications. In the past century, the intensification of human activity on our earth has also led to man-made climatological changes, e.g., as a consequence of atmospheric pollution, in particular greenhouse gases (such as carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide). A higher concentration of such gases tends to make the earth’s temperature higher. If this greenhouse effect continues (as a result of further industrial growth, mobility, household consumption or agriculture), then the earth’ climate may show significant changes, such as changes in the biosphere, variations in wind and weather conditions, melting of glaciers, sealevel rise, wetland loss and erosion. Clearly, a precise prediction of such variations is fraught with many uncertainties, but it is possible that the changes will be rather drastic in the long run.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aghion, P, Howitt P (1998) Endogenous growth theory. MIT Press, Cambridge
Begg KG, Jackson T, Parkinson S (2001) Beyond joint implementation-designing flexibility into global climate policy. Energy Policy 29:17–27
Bollen J, Gielen A, Timmer H (1999a) Clubs, ceilings and CDM. Macroeconomics of compliance with the Kyoto Protocol. The Energy Journal 20:177–206.
Bollen J, Manders T, Timmer H (1999b) Kyoto and carbon leakage. simulations with WorldScan. In: Pan JH, van Leeuwen N, Timmer H, Swart R (1999b), Proceedings of IPCC expert meeting on economic impact of mitigation measures. CPB, The Hague, pp. 93–116.
Bosi M, Ellis J (1999) Implications of multi-project emissions baselines for CDM projects — examples from the electricity generation sectors in Brazil and India. In: Baron R, Bosi M, Lanza A (eds) Emission trading and the clean development mechanism: resource transfers, project costs and investment incentives. IEA
Chen W (2003) Carbon quota price and CDM potentials after Marrakesh. Energy Policy 31:709–719
Duic N, Alves LM, Chen F, da Gracca Carvalho M (2003) Potential of Kyoto protocol clean development mechanism in transfer clean energy technologies to small island developing states. Case study of Cape Verde. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 7:83–98
Fichtner W, Goebelt M, Rentz O (2001) The efficiency of international cooperation in mitigating climate change. Analysis of joint implementation, the clean development mechanism and emission trading for the Federal Republic of Germany, the Russian Federation and Indonesia. Energy Policy 29:817–830
Forner C, Jotzo F (2002) Future restrictions for sinks in the CDM. How about a cap on supply? Climate Policy 2:353–365
Geres R, Michaelowa A (2002) A qualitative method to consider leakage effects from CDM and JI projects. Energy Policy 30: 461–463
Gerlagh R, Dellink R, Hofkes M, Verbruggen H (2000) An applied general equilibrium model to calculate a Sustainable National Income for the Netherlands. In: Verbruggen H (ed) Final report on calculations of a sustainable national income according to Hueting’s methodology. Institute for Environmental Studies, Amsterdam, pp 97–124
Ginsburgh, V., M. Keyzer (1997). The Structure of Applied General Equilibrium Models. Cambridge, MIT Press.
Gruebler A (1998) Technology and global change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Halsnaes K (2002) Market potential for Kyoto mechanisms—estimation of global market potential for co-operative greenhouse gas emission reduction policies. Energy Policy 30:13–32
Harberger AC (1962) The incidence of the corporation income tax. Journal of Political Economy 70:215–240
Hardner JJ, Frumhoff PC, Goetze DC (1999) Prospects for mitigating carbon, conserving biodiversity, and promoting socioeconomic development objectives through the clean development mechanism. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 5:61–80
Hertel TW, Tsigas ME (1997) Structure of GTAP. In: Hertel TW (1997) Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 9–71
Hertel TW (1997) Introduction and Overview. In: Hertel TW (ed) Global trade analysis: Modeling and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–12
IISD (2002) Earth Negotiation Bulletin 12:209 http.//www.iisd.ca/linkages/vol12/enb12209e.html
IPCC (2001) Climate change: the IPCC scientific assessment, intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Jackson T (1995) Joint implementation and cost-effectiveness under the framework convention on climate change. Energy Policy 19:35–47
Jaffe AB, Peterson StR, Portney PR, Stavins R (1995) Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of US manufacturing. Journal of Economic Literature 33:557–572
Johansen L (1960) A multi-sector study of economic growth. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam
Jotzo F, Michaelowa A (2002) Estimating the CDM market under the Marakech Accords. Climate Policy 2:179–196
Kremers H, Wang S, Nijkamp P (2002) Modelling issues on climate change policies—A discussion of the GTAP-E model. Journal of Environmental Systems 28:217–241.
de Leeuw R, van Ierland EC (2003) CDM in climate policies in the Netherlands. A promising tool? In: Faure M, Gupta J, Nentjes A (eds) Climate change and the Kyoto protocol: The role of institutions and instruments to control global change. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 71–94
Loeschel A (2002) Technological change in economic models of environmental policy: A survey. Ecological Economics 43:105–126
Lucas Jr. RE (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22:3–42
Michaelowa A (2003) The Kyoto protocol and its flexibility mechanisms. International Society for Ecological Economics: Internet Encyclopaedia of Ecological Economics, http//www.ecologicaleconomics.org/publica/encyc_entries/Kyotoandflex.pdf.
Noble I, Scholes RJ (2001) Sinks and the Kyoto protocol. Climate Policy 1:5–25
Nordhaus WD, Yang Z (1996) A regional dynamic general-equilibrium model of alternative climate change strategies. American Economic Review 86:741–765
Parkinson S, Begg K, Bailey P, Jackson T (1999) JI/CDM crediting under the Kyoto Protocol: Does ‘interim period banking’ help or hinder GHG emissions reduction? Energy Policy 27:126–136
Romer PM (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94:1002–1037
Scarf H (1967) On the Computation of Equilibrium Prices. In: Fellner W et al. (eds) Ten Economic Studies in the Tradition of Irving Fisher. John Wiley, New York, pp 207–230
Schwarze R, Niles JO (2000) The long-term requirement for clean development mechanism: Forestry and economic liability. Journal of Environment and Development 9:384–404
Shoven JB, Whalley J (1984) Applied general-equilibrium models of taxation and international trade: An introduction and survey. Journal of Economic Literature 22: 1007–1051
Shoven JB, Whalley J (1992) Applying General Equilibrium. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Sijm JPM, Ormel F, Martens JW, van Rooijen SNM, Voogt MH, van Wees MT, de Zoeten-Dartenset C (2000) Kyoto mechanisms: The role of joint implementation, the clean development mechanism and emissions trading in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Netherlands Energy Research Foundation ECN, Petten.
Solow RM (1957) Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics 39:312–320
Toman M, Hourcade J (2000) From Bonn to The Hague: Many questions remain. Resources 138:14–16
Truong TP (1999) GTAP-E. Incorporating Energy Substitution into GTAP Model. Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Wang S, Nijkamp P, Verhoef ET (2001) Modelling externalities between ecological and economic systems, Journal of Environmental Law and Policy 26:395–415
Wang S, Nijkamp P, Kuik O (2003) Global environmental change regimes: Impact assessment on the basis of an extended GTAP model. In: Faure M, Gupta J, Nentjes A (eds) Climate change and the Kyoto protocol: The role of institutions and instruments to control global change. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 248–276
Weyant JP, Olavson T (1999) Issues in modeling induced technological change in energy, environmental, and climate policy. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 4:67–85
Weyant JP (1999) Economics of the Kyoto Protocol. Energy Journal 20:25–72
Woerdman E (2000) Implementing the Kyoto protocol: Why JI and CDM show more promise than international emissions trading. Energy Policy 28:29–38
Zhang Z-X (2000) The design and implementation of an international trading scheme for greenhouse gas emissions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 18:321–37
Zhang Z-X (2001) An assessment of the EU proposal for ceilings on the use of Kyoto flexibility mechanisms. Ecological Economics 37:53–69
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wang, S., Nijkamp, P. (2007). Impact Assessment of Clean Development Mechanisms in a General Spatial Equilibrium Context. In: Cooper, R., Donaghy, K., Hewings, G. (eds) Globalization and Regional Economic Modeling. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72444-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72444-5_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72443-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72444-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)