Skip to main content

Impact Assessment of Clean Development Mechanisms in a General Spatial Equilibrium Context

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

Abstract

The climate on our earth has always been in a state of flux. It has, for instance, exhibited dramatic cycles of glacier movements in the past and it will continue to change in the future. Human beings have — with more or less success — adjusted themselves to such changes, and this has prompted creative survival strategies with far reaching social-economic and geographical implications. In the past century, the intensification of human activity on our earth has also led to man-made climatological changes, e.g., as a consequence of atmospheric pollution, in particular greenhouse gases (such as carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide). A higher concentration of such gases tends to make the earth’s temperature higher. If this greenhouse effect continues (as a result of further industrial growth, mobility, household consumption or agriculture), then the earth’ climate may show significant changes, such as changes in the biosphere, variations in wind and weather conditions, melting of glaciers, sealevel rise, wetland loss and erosion. Clearly, a precise prediction of such variations is fraught with many uncertainties, but it is possible that the changes will be rather drastic in the long run.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aghion, P, Howitt P (1998) Endogenous growth theory. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Begg KG, Jackson T, Parkinson S (2001) Beyond joint implementation-designing flexibility into global climate policy. Energy Policy 29:17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen J, Gielen A, Timmer H (1999a) Clubs, ceilings and CDM. Macroeconomics of compliance with the Kyoto Protocol. The Energy Journal 20:177–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen J, Manders T, Timmer H (1999b) Kyoto and carbon leakage. simulations with WorldScan. In: Pan JH, van Leeuwen N, Timmer H, Swart R (1999b), Proceedings of IPCC expert meeting on economic impact of mitigation measures. CPB, The Hague, pp. 93–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosi M, Ellis J (1999) Implications of multi-project emissions baselines for CDM projects — examples from the electricity generation sectors in Brazil and India. In: Baron R, Bosi M, Lanza A (eds) Emission trading and the clean development mechanism: resource transfers, project costs and investment incentives. IEA

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen W (2003) Carbon quota price and CDM potentials after Marrakesh. Energy Policy 31:709–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duic N, Alves LM, Chen F, da Gracca Carvalho M (2003) Potential of Kyoto protocol clean development mechanism in transfer clean energy technologies to small island developing states. Case study of Cape Verde. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 7:83–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fichtner W, Goebelt M, Rentz O (2001) The efficiency of international cooperation in mitigating climate change. Analysis of joint implementation, the clean development mechanism and emission trading for the Federal Republic of Germany, the Russian Federation and Indonesia. Energy Policy 29:817–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forner C, Jotzo F (2002) Future restrictions for sinks in the CDM. How about a cap on supply? Climate Policy 2:353–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geres R, Michaelowa A (2002) A qualitative method to consider leakage effects from CDM and JI projects. Energy Policy 30: 461–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlagh R, Dellink R, Hofkes M, Verbruggen H (2000) An applied general equilibrium model to calculate a Sustainable National Income for the Netherlands. In: Verbruggen H (ed) Final report on calculations of a sustainable national income according to Hueting’s methodology. Institute for Environmental Studies, Amsterdam, pp 97–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburgh, V., M. Keyzer (1997). The Structure of Applied General Equilibrium Models. Cambridge, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruebler A (1998) Technology and global change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Halsnaes K (2002) Market potential for Kyoto mechanisms—estimation of global market potential for co-operative greenhouse gas emission reduction policies. Energy Policy 30:13–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harberger AC (1962) The incidence of the corporation income tax. Journal of Political Economy 70:215–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardner JJ, Frumhoff PC, Goetze DC (1999) Prospects for mitigating carbon, conserving biodiversity, and promoting socioeconomic development objectives through the clean development mechanism. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 5:61–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertel TW, Tsigas ME (1997) Structure of GTAP. In: Hertel TW (1997) Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 9–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel TW (1997) Introduction and Overview. In: Hertel TW (ed) Global trade analysis: Modeling and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • IISD (2002) Earth Negotiation Bulletin 12:209 http.//www.iisd.ca/linkages/vol12/enb12209e.html

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2001) Climate change: the IPCC scientific assessment, intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson T (1995) Joint implementation and cost-effectiveness under the framework convention on climate change. Energy Policy 19:35–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe AB, Peterson StR, Portney PR, Stavins R (1995) Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of US manufacturing. Journal of Economic Literature 33:557–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen L (1960) A multi-sector study of economic growth. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Jotzo F, Michaelowa A (2002) Estimating the CDM market under the Marakech Accords. Climate Policy 2:179–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremers H, Wang S, Nijkamp P (2002) Modelling issues on climate change policies—A discussion of the GTAP-E model. Journal of Environmental Systems 28:217–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Leeuw R, van Ierland EC (2003) CDM in climate policies in the Netherlands. A promising tool? In: Faure M, Gupta J, Nentjes A (eds) Climate change and the Kyoto protocol: The role of institutions and instruments to control global change. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 71–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeschel A (2002) Technological change in economic models of environmental policy: A survey. Ecological Economics 43:105–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas Jr. RE (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22:3–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelowa A (2003) The Kyoto protocol and its flexibility mechanisms. International Society for Ecological Economics: Internet Encyclopaedia of Ecological Economics, http//www.ecologicaleconomics.org/publica/encyc_entries/Kyotoandflex.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble I, Scholes RJ (2001) Sinks and the Kyoto protocol. Climate Policy 1:5–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus WD, Yang Z (1996) A regional dynamic general-equilibrium model of alternative climate change strategies. American Economic Review 86:741–765

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson S, Begg K, Bailey P, Jackson T (1999) JI/CDM crediting under the Kyoto Protocol: Does ‘interim period banking’ help or hinder GHG emissions reduction? Energy Policy 27:126–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer PM (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94:1002–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarf H (1967) On the Computation of Equilibrium Prices. In: Fellner W et al. (eds) Ten Economic Studies in the Tradition of Irving Fisher. John Wiley, New York, pp 207–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarze R, Niles JO (2000) The long-term requirement for clean development mechanism: Forestry and economic liability. Journal of Environment and Development 9:384–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoven JB, Whalley J (1984) Applied general-equilibrium models of taxation and international trade: An introduction and survey. Journal of Economic Literature 22: 1007–1051

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoven JB, Whalley J (1992) Applying General Equilibrium. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sijm JPM, Ormel F, Martens JW, van Rooijen SNM, Voogt MH, van Wees MT, de Zoeten-Dartenset C (2000) Kyoto mechanisms: The role of joint implementation, the clean development mechanism and emissions trading in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Netherlands Energy Research Foundation ECN, Petten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow RM (1957) Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics 39:312–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toman M, Hourcade J (2000) From Bonn to The Hague: Many questions remain. Resources 138:14–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Truong TP (1999) GTAP-E. Incorporating Energy Substitution into GTAP Model. Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Nijkamp P, Verhoef ET (2001) Modelling externalities between ecological and economic systems, Journal of Environmental Law and Policy 26:395–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Nijkamp P, Kuik O (2003) Global environmental change regimes: Impact assessment on the basis of an extended GTAP model. In: Faure M, Gupta J, Nentjes A (eds) Climate change and the Kyoto protocol: The role of institutions and instruments to control global change. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 248–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyant JP, Olavson T (1999) Issues in modeling induced technological change in energy, environmental, and climate policy. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 4:67–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weyant JP (1999) Economics of the Kyoto Protocol. Energy Journal 20:25–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Woerdman E (2000) Implementing the Kyoto protocol: Why JI and CDM show more promise than international emissions trading. Energy Policy 28:29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z-X (2000) The design and implementation of an international trading scheme for greenhouse gas emissions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 18:321–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z-X (2001) An assessment of the EU proposal for ceilings on the use of Kyoto flexibility mechanisms. Ecological Economics 37:53–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wang, S., Nijkamp, P. (2007). Impact Assessment of Clean Development Mechanisms in a General Spatial Equilibrium Context. In: Cooper, R., Donaghy, K., Hewings, G. (eds) Globalization and Regional Economic Modeling. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72444-5_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics