Skip to main content

Managing Large Herbivores in Theory and Practice: Is the Game the Same for Browsing and Grazing Species

  • Chapter

Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD,volume 195)

Management of large wild herbivores sometimes includes action on the availability of resources and/or on the abundance of predators, but the management of most populations of these animals is limited to the choice of hunting quotas (Williams et al. 2002). The dynamics of the target populations, in interaction with their habitats, is therefore a central process in management. The dynamics of populations is driven by their demographic parameters, i.e., the rates of reproduction and survival. Demographic rates vary according to the sex and age of the individuals, and also show different degrees of temporal and spatial variation among populations (Gaillard et al. 2000; Coulson et al. 2001). In this chapter we first address the question: do browsing and grazing large herbivores have different demographic rates driving the dynamics of their populations?

Keywords

  • Adult Survival
  • Large Herbivore
  • Maximum Sustainable Yield
  • Demographic Rate
  • Population Productivity

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-72422-3_11
  • Chapter length: 15 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-540-72422-3
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albon SD, Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE (1987) Early development and population dynamics in Red Deer. II. Density-independent effects and cohort variation. J Anim Ecol 56:69–81.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Aldous SE (1944) A deer browse survey method. J Mammal 25:130–136.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen J (1953) Analysis of a Danish roe-deer population (Capreolus capreolus L) based upon the extermination of the total stock. Dan Rev Game Biol 2:127–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen R, Duncan P, Linnell JDC (1998) The European roe deer: the biology of success. Scandinavian Univ Press, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blant M, Gaillard JM (2004) Use of biometric body variables as indicators of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) population density changes. Game Wildl Sci 21:21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond WJ, Midgley GF (2000) A proposed CO2-controlled mechanism of woody plant invasion in grasslands and savannas. Glob Change Biol 6:865–869.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Boutin JM, Gaillard JM, Delorme D, Van Laere G (1987) Suivi de l’évolution de la fécondité chez le chevreuil (Capreolus capreolus) par l’observation des groupes familiaux. Gibier Faune Sauvage 4:255–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH, West GB (2000) Scaling in biology. Oxford Univ Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR, Laake JL (1980) Estimation of density from line transect sampling of biological populations. Wildlife Monogr No 72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns J, McCormick PV, Niederlehner BR (1993) A proposed framework for developing indicators of ecosystem health. Hydrobiologia 236:1–44.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Calder WA (1984) Size, function and life history. Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caughley G (1977) Analysis of vertebrate populations. Wiley, Chichester, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cederlund G, Bergqvist J, Kjellander P, Gill R, Gaillard J-M, Boisaubert B, Ballon P, Duncan P (1998) Managing roe deer and their impact on the environment: maximising the net benefits to society. In: Andersen R, Duncan P, Linnell JDC (eds) The European roe deer: the biology of success. Scandinavian Univ Press, Oslo, pp 337–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson T, Catchpole EA, Albon SD, Morgan BJT, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH, Crawley MJ, Grenfell BT (2001) Age, sex, density, winter weather, and population crashes in Soay sheep. Science 292:1528–1531.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dale VH, Beyeler SC (2001) Challenges in the development and use of ecological indicators. Ecol Indic 1:3–10.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan AJ, Poppi DP, this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • du Toit JT (2002) Wildlife harvesting guidelines for community-based wildlife management: a southern African perspective. Biodivers Conserv 11:1403–1416.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson G, Wallin K (1999) Hunter observations as an index of moose Alces alces population parameters. Wildlife Biol 5:177–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher DA, Owens IPF (2000) Female home range size and the evolution of social organization in macropod marsupials. J Anim Ecol 69:1083–1098.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler CW (1981) Density dependence as related to life history strategy. Ecology 62:602–610.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler CW (1987) A review of density-dependence in populations of large mammals. In: Genoways HH (ed) Current mammalogy. Plenum, New York, pp 401–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler CW (1988) Population dynamics as related to rate of increase per generation. Evol Ecol 2:197–204.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz H, Loison A (2006) Large herbivores across biomes. In: Danell K, Duncan P, Bergström R, Pastor J (eds) Large herbivore ecology, ecosystem dynamics and conservation. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, pp 19–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard J-M, Yoccoz NG (2003) Temporal variation in survival of mammals: a case of environmental canalization? Ecology 84:3294–3306.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard J-M, Pontier D, Allainé D, Lebreton JD, Trouvilliez J, Clobert J (1989) An analysis of demographic tactics in birds and mammals. Oikos 56:59–76.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard J-M, Delorme D, Boutin JM, Van Laere G, Boisaubert B, Pradel R (1993) Roe deer survival patterns: a comparative analysis of contrasting populations. J Anim Ecol 62:778–791.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard J-M, Delorme D, Boutin JM, Van Laere G, Boisaubert B (1996) Body mass of roe deer fawns during winter in two contrasting populations. Journal of Wildlife Management 60:29–36.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard J-M, Festa-Bianchet M, Yoccoz NG (1998a) Population dynamics of large herbivores: variable recruitment with constant adult survival. Trends Ecol Evol 13:58–63.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard J-M, Andersen R, Delorme D, Linnell JDC (1998b) Family effects on growth and survival of juvenile roe deer. Ecology 79:2878–2889.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard J-M, Festa-Bianchet M, Yoccoz NG, Loison A, Toïgo C (2000) Temporal variation in fitness components and population dynamics of large herbivores. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:367–393.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard J-M, Loison A, Toïgo C (2003) Variation in life history traits and realistic population models for wildlife management. In: Festa-Bianchet M, Apollonio M (eds) Animal behavior and wildlife conservation. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 115–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard J-M, Yoccoz NG, Lebreton JD, Bonenfant C, Devillard S, Loison A, Pontier D, D Allainé (2005) Generation time: a reliable metric to measure life history variation among mammalian populations. Am Nat 166:119–123.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gill R (1990) Monitoring the status of European and North American cervids. GEMS information series global environment monitoring system. UN Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin ME, Ayala FJ (1973) Global models of growth and competition. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA, 70:3590–3593.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon IJ (2003) Browsing and grazing ruminants: are they different beasts? Forest Ecol Manage 181:13–21.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon IJ, Prins HHT, this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewison AJM, Vincent J-P, Bideau E, Angibault J-M, Putman RJ (1996) Variation in cohort mandible size as an index of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) densities and population trends. J Zool 239:573–581.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann RR (1989) Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: a comparative view of their digestive system. Oecologia 78:443–457.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2001) Working Group I third assessment report, climate change 2001: the scientific basis. http://www.gcrio.org/online.html.

  • Jachmann H (2001) Estimating abundance of African wildlife: an aid to adaptive management. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jachmann H (2002) Comparison of aerial counts with ground counts for large African herbivores. J Appl Ecol 39:841–852.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Janis CM, Damuth J, Theodor JM (2000) Miocene ungulates and terrestrial primary productivity: where have all the browsers gone? Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 97:7899–7904.

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jarman PJ (1974) The social organisation of antelope in relation to their ecology. Behaviour 48:215–265.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kjellander P, Gaillard J-M, Hewison AJM (2006) Density-dependent responses of fawn cohort body mass in two contrasting roe deer populations. Oecologia 146:521–530.

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lancia RA, Braun CE, Collopy MW, Dueser RD, Kie JG, Martinka CJ, Nichols JD, Nudds TD, Porath WR, Tilghman NG (1996) ARM! For the future: adaptive resource management in the wildlife profession. Wildlife Soc B 24:436–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande R, Engen S, Saether B-E (2003) Stochastic population dynamics in ecology and conservation. Oxford Univ Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebreton JD, Clobert J (1991) Bird population dynamics, management and conservation: the role of mathematical modelling. In: Perrins CM, Lebreton JD, Hirons GJM (eds) Bird population studies: their relevance to conservation and management. Oxford Univ Press, Oxford, pp 105–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loison A, Appolinaire J, Jullien J-M, Dubray D (2006) How reliable are total counts to detect trends in population size of chamois Rupicapra rupicapra and R. pyrenaica. Wildlife Biol 12:77–88.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Maillard D, Gaultier P, Boisaubert B (1999) Revue de l’utilisation des différentes méthodes de suivi des populations de chevreuils en France. Le bulletin mensuel de l’office national de la chasse 244:30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough DR (1979) The George Reserve deer herd: population ecology of a K-selected species. Univ of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • McShea WJ, Underwood HB, Rappole JH (1997) The science of overabundance: deer ecology and population management. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morellet N (1998) Des outils biométriques appliqués aux suivis des populations animales: l’exemple des cervidés. Thesis, Univ of Lyon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morellet N, Champely S, Gaillard J-M, Ballon P, Boscardin Y (2001) The browsing index: new tool uses browsing pressure to monitor deer populations. Wildlife Soc B 29:1243–1252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morellet N, Ballon P, Boscardin Y, Champely S (2003) A new index to measure roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) browsing pressure on woody flora. Game Wildlife Sci 20:155–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mysterud A (1998) The relative roles of body size and feeding type on activity time of temperate ruminants. Oecologia 113:442–446.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mysterud A, Langvatn R, Yoccoz NG, Stenseth NC (2002) Large-scale habitat variability, delayed density effects and red deer populations in Norway. J Anim Ecol 71:569–580.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy KA, Bradshaw SD (2000) Scaling of energy and water fluxes in free-living arid-zone Australian marsupials. J Mammal 81:962–970.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols JD, Johnson FA, Williams BK (1995) Managing North American waterfowl in the face of uncertainty. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 26:177–199.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith N, Mason DR (2005) Comparative changes in adult vs. juvenile survival affecting population trends of African ungulates. J Anim Ecol 74:762–773.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith N, Mills MGL (2006) Manifold interactive influences on the population dynamics of a multispecies ungulate assemblage. Ecol Monogr 76:73–92.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Barberia FJ, Gordon IJ (2000) Differences in body mass and oral morphology between the sexes in the Artiodactyla: evolutionary relationships with sexual segregation. Ecol Evol Res 2:667–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Barberia FJ, Gordon IJ (2001) Relationships between oral morphology and feeding style in the Ungulata: a phylogenetically controlled evaluation. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 268:1023–1032.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peters RH (1983) The ecological implication of body size. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettorelli N, Gaillard J-M, Van Laere G, Duncan P, Kjellander P, Liberg O, Delorme D, Maillard D (2002) Variations in adult body mass in roe deer: the effects of population density at birth and of habitat quality. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 269:747–753.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Price T (1997) Correlated evolution and independent contrasts. Philos T Roy Soc B 352:519–529.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe PR (1987) The management of red deer in the commercial forests of Scotland related to population dynamics and habitat changes. Thesis, Univ of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfern JV, Viljoen PC, Kruger JM, Getz WM (2002) Biases in estimating population size from an aerial census: a case study in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. S Afr J Sci 98:455–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs RE, Starck JM (1996) Applications of phylogenetically independent contrasts: a mixed progress report. Oikos 77:167–172.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rochet MJ, Cornillon PA, Sabatier R, Pontier D (2000) Comparative analysis of phylogenetic and fishing effects in life history patterns of teleost fishes. Oikos 91:255–270.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Runge MC, Johnson FA (2002) The importance of functional form in optimal control solutions of problems in population dynamics. Ecology 83:1357–1371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saether B-E (1997) Environmental stochasticity and population dynamics of large herbivores: a search for mechanisms. Trends Ecol Evol 12:143–149.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Saether, B-E and I J Gordon 1994 The adaptive significance of reproductive strategies in ungulates. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 256:263–268.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seber GAF (1982) The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters, 2nd edn. Griffin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea K, NCEAS working group (1998) Management of populations in conservations, harvesting and control. Trends Ecol Evol 13:371–375.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shine R, Charnov EL (1992) Patterns of survival, growth, and maturation in snakes and lizards. Am Nat 139:1257–1269.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair ARE (1996) Mammal populations: fluctuation, regulation, life history theory and their implications for conservation. In: Floyd RB, Sheppard AW, De Barro PJ (eds) Frontiers of population ecology. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, pp 127–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1983) The influence of size and phylogeny on patterns of covariation among life history traits in the mammals. Oikos 41:173–187.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford Univ Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toïgo C, Gaillard J-M, Van Laere G, Hewison AJM, Morellet N (2006) How does environmental variation influence body mass, body size and body condition? Roe deer as a case study. Ecography 29:301–308.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Van Horne B (1983) Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. J Wildlife Manage 47:893–901.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wieren SE (1996) Digestive strategies in ruminants and nonruminants. Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural Univ, Wageningen, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent J-P, Gaillard J-M, Bideau E (1991) Kilometric index as biological indicator for monitoring forest roe deer populations. Acta Theriol 36:315–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent J-P, Bideau E, Hewison AJM, Angibault JM (1995) The influence of increasing density on body weight, kid production, home range and winter grouping in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). J Zool 236:371–382.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vrba ES (1987) Ecology in relation to speciation rates: some case histories of Miocene–recent mammal clades. Evol Ecol 1:283–300.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Waller DM, Alverson WS (1997) The white-tailed deer: a keystone herbivore. Wildlife Soc B 25:217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters CJ (1986) Adaptive management of renewable resources. MacMillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren RJ (1997) The challenge of deer overabundance in the 21st century. Wildlife Soc B 25:213–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams BK, Nichols JD, Conroy MJ (2002) Analysis and management of animal populations. Academic Press, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanneïse A, Baïsse A, Gaillard JM, Hewison AJM, Saint-Hilaire K, Toïgo C, Van Laere G, Morellet N (2007) Hind foot length: an indicator for monitoring roe deer populations at a landscape scale. Wildlife Soc B (In press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gaillard, JM., Duncan, P., van Wieren, S.E., Loison, A., Klein, F., Maillard, D. (2008). Managing Large Herbivores in Theory and Practice: Is the Game the Same for Browsing and Grazing Species. In: Gordon, I.J., Prins, H.H.T. (eds) The Ecology of Browsing and Grazing. Ecological Studies, vol 195. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72422-3_11

Download citation