Managing Large Herbivores in Theory and Practice: Is the Game the Same for Browsing and Grazing Species

  • Jean-Michel Gaillard
  • Patrick Duncan
  • Sip E. van Wieren
  • Anne Loison
  • François Klein
  • Daniel Maillard
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 195)

Management of large wild herbivores sometimes includes action on the availability of resources and/or on the abundance of predators, but the management of most populations of these animals is limited to the choice of hunting quotas (Williams et al. 2002). The dynamics of the target populations, in interaction with their habitats, is therefore a central process in management. The dynamics of populations is driven by their demographic parameters, i.e., the rates of reproduction and survival. Demographic rates vary according to the sex and age of the individuals, and also show different degrees of temporal and spatial variation among populations (Gaillard et al. 2000; Coulson et al. 2001). In this chapter we first address the question: do browsing and grazing large herbivores have different demographic rates driving the dynamics of their populations?


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Albon SD, Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE (1987) Early development and population dynamics in Red Deer. II. Density-independent effects and cohort variation. J Anim Ecol 56:69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldous SE (1944) A deer browse survey method. J Mammal 25:130–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen J (1953) Analysis of a Danish roe-deer population (Capreolus capreolus L) based upon the extermination of the total stock. Dan Rev Game Biol 2:127–155.Google Scholar
  4. Andersen R, Duncan P, Linnell JDC (1998) The European roe deer: the biology of success. Scandinavian Univ Press, Oslo.Google Scholar
  5. Blant M, Gaillard JM (2004) Use of biometric body variables as indicators of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) population density changes. Game Wildl Sci 21:21–40.Google Scholar
  6. Bond WJ, Midgley GF (2000) A proposed CO2-controlled mechanism of woody plant invasion in grasslands and savannas. Glob Change Biol 6:865–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boutin JM, Gaillard JM, Delorme D, Van Laere G (1987) Suivi de l’évolution de la fécondité chez le chevreuil (Capreolus capreolus) par l’observation des groupes familiaux. Gibier Faune Sauvage 4:255–265.Google Scholar
  8. Brown JH, West GB (2000) Scaling in biology. Oxford Univ Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York.Google Scholar
  10. Burnham KP, Anderson DR, Laake JL (1980) Estimation of density from line transect sampling of biological populations. Wildlife Monogr No 72.Google Scholar
  11. Cairns J, McCormick PV, Niederlehner BR (1993) A proposed framework for developing indicators of ecosystem health. Hydrobiologia 236:1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Calder WA (1984) Size, function and life history. Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  13. Caughley G (1977) Analysis of vertebrate populations. Wiley, Chichester, NY.Google Scholar
  14. Cederlund G, Bergqvist J, Kjellander P, Gill R, Gaillard J-M, Boisaubert B, Ballon P, Duncan P (1998) Managing roe deer and their impact on the environment: maximising the net benefits to society. In: Andersen R, Duncan P, Linnell JDC (eds) The European roe deer: the biology of success. Scandinavian Univ Press, Oslo, pp 337–372.Google Scholar
  15. Coulson T, Catchpole EA, Albon SD, Morgan BJT, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH, Crawley MJ, Grenfell BT (2001) Age, sex, density, winter weather, and population crashes in Soay sheep. Science 292:1528–1531.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dale VH, Beyeler SC (2001) Challenges in the development and use of ecological indicators. Ecol Indic 1:3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duncan AJ, Poppi DP, this volume.Google Scholar
  18. du Toit JT (2002) Wildlife harvesting guidelines for community-based wildlife management: a southern African perspective. Biodivers Conserv 11:1403–1416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ericsson G, Wallin K (1999) Hunter observations as an index of moose Alces alces population parameters. Wildlife Biol 5:177–185.Google Scholar
  20. Fisher DA, Owens IPF (2000) Female home range size and the evolution of social organization in macropod marsupials. J Anim Ecol 69:1083–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fowler CW (1981) Density dependence as related to life history strategy. Ecology 62:602–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fowler CW (1987) A review of density-dependence in populations of large mammals. In: Genoways HH (ed) Current mammalogy. Plenum, New York, pp 401–441.Google Scholar
  23. Fowler CW (1988) Population dynamics as related to rate of increase per generation. Evol Ecol 2:197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fritz H, Loison A (2006) Large herbivores across biomes. In: Danell K, Duncan P, Bergström R, Pastor J (eds) Large herbivore ecology, ecosystem dynamics and conservation. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, pp 19–49.Google Scholar
  25. Gaillard J-M, Yoccoz NG (2003) Temporal variation in survival of mammals: a case of environmental canalization? Ecology 84:3294–3306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gaillard J-M, Pontier D, Allainé D, Lebreton JD, Trouvilliez J, Clobert J (1989) An analysis of demographic tactics in birds and mammals. Oikos 56:59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gaillard J-M, Delorme D, Boutin JM, Van Laere G, Boisaubert B, Pradel R (1993) Roe deer survival patterns: a comparative analysis of contrasting populations. J Anim Ecol 62:778–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gaillard J-M, Delorme D, Boutin JM, Van Laere G, Boisaubert B (1996) Body mass of roe deer fawns during winter in two contrasting populations. Journal of Wildlife Management 60:29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gaillard J-M, Festa-Bianchet M, Yoccoz NG (1998a) Population dynamics of large herbivores: variable recruitment with constant adult survival. Trends Ecol Evol 13:58–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gaillard J-M, Andersen R, Delorme D, Linnell JDC (1998b) Family effects on growth and survival of juvenile roe deer. Ecology 79:2878–2889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gaillard J-M, Festa-Bianchet M, Yoccoz NG, Loison A, Toïgo C (2000) Temporal variation in fitness components and population dynamics of large herbivores. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:367–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gaillard J-M, Loison A, Toïgo C (2003) Variation in life history traits and realistic population models for wildlife management. In: Festa-Bianchet M, Apollonio M (eds) Animal behavior and wildlife conservation. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 115–132.Google Scholar
  33. Gaillard J-M, Yoccoz NG, Lebreton JD, Bonenfant C, Devillard S, Loison A, Pontier D, D Allainé (2005) Generation time: a reliable metric to measure life history variation among mammalian populations. Am Nat 166:119–123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gill R (1990) Monitoring the status of European and North American cervids. GEMS information series global environment monitoring system. UN Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  35. Gilpin ME, Ayala FJ (1973) Global models of growth and competition. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA, 70:3590–3593.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gordon IJ (2003) Browsing and grazing ruminants: are they different beasts? Forest Ecol Manage 181:13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gordon IJ, Prins HHT, this volume.Google Scholar
  38. Hewison AJM, Vincent J-P, Bideau E, Angibault J-M, Putman RJ (1996) Variation in cohort mandible size as an index of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) densities and population trends. J Zool 239:573–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hofmann RR (1989) Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: a comparative view of their digestive system. Oecologia 78:443–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. IPCC (2001) Working Group I third assessment report, climate change 2001: the scientific basis.
  41. Jachmann H (2001) Estimating abundance of African wildlife: an aid to adaptive management. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York.Google Scholar
  42. Jachmann H (2002) Comparison of aerial counts with ground counts for large African herbivores. J Appl Ecol 39:841–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Janis CM, Damuth J, Theodor JM (2000) Miocene ungulates and terrestrial primary productivity: where have all the browsers gone? Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 97:7899–7904.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jarman PJ (1974) The social organisation of antelope in relation to their ecology. Behaviour 48:215–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kjellander P, Gaillard J-M, Hewison AJM (2006) Density-dependent responses of fawn cohort body mass in two contrasting roe deer populations. Oecologia 146:521–530.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lancia RA, Braun CE, Collopy MW, Dueser RD, Kie JG, Martinka CJ, Nichols JD, Nudds TD, Porath WR, Tilghman NG (1996) ARM! For the future: adaptive resource management in the wildlife profession. Wildlife Soc B 24:436–442.Google Scholar
  47. Lande R, Engen S, Saether B-E (2003) Stochastic population dynamics in ecology and conservation. Oxford Univ Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  48. Lebreton JD, Clobert J (1991) Bird population dynamics, management and conservation: the role of mathematical modelling. In: Perrins CM, Lebreton JD, Hirons GJM (eds) Bird population studies: their relevance to conservation and management. Oxford Univ Press, Oxford, pp 105–125.Google Scholar
  49. Loison A, Appolinaire J, Jullien J-M, Dubray D (2006) How reliable are total counts to detect trends in population size of chamois Rupicapra rupicapra and R. pyrenaica. Wildlife Biol 12:77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Maillard D, Gaultier P, Boisaubert B (1999) Revue de l’utilisation des différentes méthodes de suivi des populations de chevreuils en France. Le bulletin mensuel de l’office national de la chasse 244:30–37.Google Scholar
  51. McCullough DR (1979) The George Reserve deer herd: population ecology of a K-selected species. Univ of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  52. McShea WJ, Underwood HB, Rappole JH (1997) The science of overabundance: deer ecology and population management. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  53. Morellet N (1998) Des outils biométriques appliqués aux suivis des populations animales: l’exemple des cervidés. Thesis, Univ of Lyon.Google Scholar
  54. Morellet N, Champely S, Gaillard J-M, Ballon P, Boscardin Y (2001) The browsing index: new tool uses browsing pressure to monitor deer populations. Wildlife Soc B 29:1243–1252.Google Scholar
  55. Morellet N, Ballon P, Boscardin Y, Champely S (2003) A new index to measure roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) browsing pressure on woody flora. Game Wildlife Sci 20:155–173.Google Scholar
  56. Mysterud A (1998) The relative roles of body size and feeding type on activity time of temperate ruminants. Oecologia 113:442–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mysterud A, Langvatn R, Yoccoz NG, Stenseth NC (2002) Large-scale habitat variability, delayed density effects and red deer populations in Norway. J Anim Ecol 71:569–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nagy KA, Bradshaw SD (2000) Scaling of energy and water fluxes in free-living arid-zone Australian marsupials. J Mammal 81:962–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nichols JD, Johnson FA, Williams BK (1995) Managing North American waterfowl in the face of uncertainty. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 26:177–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Owen-Smith N, Mason DR (2005) Comparative changes in adult vs. juvenile survival affecting population trends of African ungulates. J Anim Ecol 74:762–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Owen-Smith N, Mills MGL (2006) Manifold interactive influences on the population dynamics of a multispecies ungulate assemblage. Ecol Monogr 76:73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Perez-Barberia FJ, Gordon IJ (2000) Differences in body mass and oral morphology between the sexes in the Artiodactyla: evolutionary relationships with sexual segregation. Ecol Evol Res 2:667–684.Google Scholar
  63. Perez-Barberia FJ, Gordon IJ (2001) Relationships between oral morphology and feeding style in the Ungulata: a phylogenetically controlled evaluation. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 268:1023–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Peters RH (1983) The ecological implication of body size. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  65. Pettorelli N, Gaillard J-M, Van Laere G, Duncan P, Kjellander P, Liberg O, Delorme D, Maillard D (2002) Variations in adult body mass in roe deer: the effects of population density at birth and of habitat quality. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 269:747–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Price T (1997) Correlated evolution and independent contrasts. Philos T Roy Soc B 352:519–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ratcliffe PR (1987) The management of red deer in the commercial forests of Scotland related to population dynamics and habitat changes. Thesis, Univ of London.Google Scholar
  68. Redfern JV, Viljoen PC, Kruger JM, Getz WM (2002) Biases in estimating population size from an aerial census: a case study in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. S Afr J Sci 98:455–461.Google Scholar
  69. Ricklefs RE, Starck JM (1996) Applications of phylogenetically independent contrasts: a mixed progress report. Oikos 77:167–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rochet MJ, Cornillon PA, Sabatier R, Pontier D (2000) Comparative analysis of phylogenetic and fishing effects in life history patterns of teleost fishes. Oikos 91:255–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Runge MC, Johnson FA (2002) The importance of functional form in optimal control solutions of problems in population dynamics. Ecology 83:1357–1371.Google Scholar
  72. Saether B-E (1997) Environmental stochasticity and population dynamics of large herbivores: a search for mechanisms. Trends Ecol Evol 12:143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Saether, B-E and I J Gordon 1994 The adaptive significance of reproductive strategies in ungulates. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 256:263–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Seber GAF (1982) The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters, 2nd edn. Griffin, London.Google Scholar
  75. Shea K, NCEAS working group (1998) Management of populations in conservations, harvesting and control. Trends Ecol Evol 13:371–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Shine R, Charnov EL (1992) Patterns of survival, growth, and maturation in snakes and lizards. Am Nat 139:1257–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sinclair ARE (1996) Mammal populations: fluctuation, regulation, life history theory and their implications for conservation. In: Floyd RB, Sheppard AW, De Barro PJ (eds) Frontiers of population ecology. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, pp 127–154.Google Scholar
  78. Stearns SC (1983) The influence of size and phylogeny on patterns of covariation among life history traits in the mammals. Oikos 41:173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford Univ Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  80. Toïgo C, Gaillard J-M, Van Laere G, Hewison AJM, Morellet N (2006) How does environmental variation influence body mass, body size and body condition? Roe deer as a case study. Ecography 29:301–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Van Horne B (1983) Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. J Wildlife Manage 47:893–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Van Wieren SE (1996) Digestive strategies in ruminants and nonruminants. Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural Univ, Wageningen, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  83. Vincent J-P, Gaillard J-M, Bideau E (1991) Kilometric index as biological indicator for monitoring forest roe deer populations. Acta Theriol 36:315–328.Google Scholar
  84. Vincent J-P, Bideau E, Hewison AJM, Angibault JM (1995) The influence of increasing density on body weight, kid production, home range and winter grouping in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). J Zool 236:371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vrba ES (1987) Ecology in relation to speciation rates: some case histories of Miocene–recent mammal clades. Evol Ecol 1:283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Waller DM, Alverson WS (1997) The white-tailed deer: a keystone herbivore. Wildlife Soc B 25:217–226.Google Scholar
  87. Walters CJ (1986) Adaptive management of renewable resources. MacMillan, New York.Google Scholar
  88. Warren RJ (1997) The challenge of deer overabundance in the 21st century. Wildlife Soc B 25:213–214.Google Scholar
  89. Williams BK, Nichols JD, Conroy MJ (2002) Analysis and management of animal populations. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  90. Zanneïse A, Baïsse A, Gaillard JM, Hewison AJM, Saint-Hilaire K, Toïgo C, Van Laere G, Morellet N (2007) Hind foot length: an indicator for monitoring roe deer populations at a landscape scale. Wildlife Soc B (In press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-Michel Gaillard
    • 1
  • Patrick Duncan
    • 2
  • Sip E. van Wieren
    • 3
  • Anne Loison
    • 1
  • François Klein
    • 4
  • Daniel Maillard
    • 4
  1. 1.Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité Lyon 1Villeurbanne CedexFrance
  2. 2.Centre d'Etdudes Biologiques de ChizéCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Villiers-en-BoisBeauvoir-sur-NiortFrance
  3. 3.Resource Ecology GroupWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune SauvageCentre National d'Étude et de Recherche AppliquéeBar-le-DucFrance

Personalised recommendations