Skip to main content

Retail Assortment: More ≠ Better

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Retailing in the 21st Century

Abstract

Product assortment strategy is a central yet complex issue for retailers. Retail product assortments have undergone drastic changes in the past decade from unparalleled large assortments in the early 1990s to the current emphasis on streamlined, efficient assortments. The purpose of this chapter is to provide guidance to retailers making these important assortment strategy decisions.

Consumer assortment perceptions have been shown to be one of the top three criteria, along with location and price, in determining retail patronage. In the 1980s and early 1990s, retailers assumed that larger product assortments better met consumer needs. Broad assortments should increase the probability that consumers will find their ideal product and offer flexibility for variety seekers. Thus, in an effort to serve the customer, the number of products offered in supermarkets escalated from 6000 stockkeeping units (SKUs) in the 1980s to over 30,000 SKUs in the early 1990s. However, the Food Marketing Institute issued two imperative reports that called this increasing assortment into question. First, these broad assortments resulted in higher inventory costs and more out-of-stocks for retailers (see Verhoef & Sloot chapter in this book for further information on out-ofstocks). Second, these higher costs made it difficult for conventional supermarkets to compete against the growing retail formats of discount stores, warehouse clubs, and supercenters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Boatwright, Peter and Joseph C. Nunes (2001): Reducing Assortment: An Attribute-Based Approach, Journal of Marketing, 65 (July), 50–63; Correction July 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broniarczyk, Susan M., Wayne D. Hoyer, and Leigh McAlister (1998): “Consumers' Perceptions of the Assortment Offered in a Grocery Category: The Impact of Item Reduction,” Journal of Marketing Research, 35 (May), 166–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chernev, Alexander (2003): When More is Less and Less is More: The Role of Ideal Point Availability and Assortment in Consumer Choice, Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (September), 170–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreze, Xavier, Stephen J. Hoch, and Mary E. Purk (1994): Shelf Management and Space Elasticity, Journal of Retailing, 70 (Winter), 301–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourville, J. & Soman, D. (2005): Overchoice and Assortment Type: When and why variety backfires, Marketing Science, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, Dhruv, Michael Levy, Anuj Mehrotra, and Arun Sharma (1999): Planning Merchandising Decisions to Account for Regional and Product Assortment Differences, Journal of Retailing, 75 (Fall), 405–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, Stephen, Eric T. Bradlow, and Brian Wansink (1999): The Variety of an Assortment, Marketing Science 18 (4), 527–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S. and M. Lepper (2000): When Choice is Demotivating: Can One desire Too Much of a Good Thing?, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, No. 6, 995–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, Barbara E. and Brian Wansink (2004): Assortment Structure on Perceived Variety, Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (March), 519–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koelemeijer, Kitty and Harmen Oppewal (1999): Assessing the Effects of Assortment and Ambience: A Choice Experimental Approach, Journal of Retailing, 75 (Fall), 319–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, Shelby H. and Christopher M. Miller (1999): The Selection and Pricing of Retail Assortments: An Empirical Approach, Journal of Retailing, 75 (Fall), 289–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morales, Andrea, Barbara E. Kahn, Leigh McAlister, and Susan M. Broniarczyk (2005): Perceptions of Assortment Variety: The Effects of Congruency Between Consumers' Internal and Retailers' External Organization, Journal of Retailing, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Herpen, Erica and Rik Pieters (2002): The Variety of an Assortment: An Extension to the Attribute-Based Approach, Marketing Science, 21 (3), 331–341.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Broniarczyk, S.M., Hoyer, W.D. (2010). Retail Assortment: More ≠ Better. In: Krafft, M., Mantrala, M. (eds) Retailing in the 21st Century. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72003-4_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics