Advertisement

Ontology, Artefacts, and Models of Reasoning

  • Pasi Pohjola
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 64)

Summary. In recent philosophical studies on technological artefacts, an idea of dual nature of artefacts has been emphasized. Although this idea of dual nature is not a novel one, recent studies have extensively developed ontological aspects of technological artefacts. According to various authors there are two constitutive elements of technological artefacts that can be described in terms of physical properties of objects and intentional action. In this paper, ontology of artefacts is connected to issues discussed by C.S. Peirce under topics of abductive reasoning and philosophy.

Keywords

Intentional Action Dual Nature Constitutive Rule Technical Artefact Technological Artefact 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anscombe G.E.M.: Intention. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1957)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baker, L.R.: The ontology of artefacts. Philosophical Explorations 7 (2004) 99-111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brandom, R.: Making it Explicit. Reasoning, Representing and Discursive Com-mitment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA (1994)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brandom, R.: Action, norms and practical reasoning. Philosophical Perspectives 12 (1998) 127-139Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bratman, M.: Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA (1987)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bratman, M.: Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and Agency. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Collins, H.: Artificial Experts. Social Knowledge and Intelligent Machines. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    von Eckhard, B.: What is Cognitive Science? MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gero, J., Kannengiesser, U.: The situated function-behavior-structure frame-work. Design Studies 25 (2004) 373-391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Houkes, W. et al.: Design and use as plans: an action-theoretical account. Design Studies 23 (2002) 303-320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Houkes, W., Meijers, A.: The ontology of artefacts: the hard problem. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37 (2006) 118-131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kroes, P.: Design methodology and the nature of technical artefacts. Design Studies 23 (2002) 287-302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kroes, P.: Screwdriver philosophy: Searle’s analysis of technical functions. Techné 6 (2003) 22-35Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kroes, P.: Coherence of structural and functional descriptions of technical arte-facts. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37 (2006) 137-151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kroes, P., Meijers, A.: The dual nature of artefacts. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37 (2006) 1-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kusch, M.: Knowledge by Agreement. Clarendon Press, Oxford (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kusch, M.: Explanation and understanding: the debate over von Wright’s phi-losophy of action revisited. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 80 (2003) 327-353Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Love, T.: Philosophy of design. a meta-theoretical structure for design theory. Design Studies 21 (2000) 293-313CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Magnani, L.: (2001) Abduction, Reason, and Science. Processes of Discovery and Explanation. Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Magnani, L.: Conjectures and manipulations: external representation in scien-tific reasoning. Mind & Society 3 (2002) 9-31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meheus, J., Batens, D.: A formal logic for abductive reasoning. Logic Journal of the IGPL 14 (2006) 221-236zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Miller, S.: Artefacts and collective intentionality. Techné 9 (2005) 52-67Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Paavola, S.: Abduction through grammar, critic and methodeutic. Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society 40(2) (2004) 245-270Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pape, H.: Charles S. Peirce on objects of thought and representation. Nôus 24 (1990) 375-395MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Peirce, C.S.: Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1931-1958. vols. 1-6, Hartshorne, C. and Weiss, P., eds.; vols. 7-8, Burks, A. W., ed.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Peirce, C.S.: The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings Vol 2 (1893-1913). The Peirce edition project (eds.). Indiana University Press, Bloomington (1998)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pohjola, P.: Abductive reasoning and linguistic meaning. Logic Journal of the IGPL 14 (2006) 321-332zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rosenman, M., Gero, J.: Purpose and function in design: from the socio-cultural to the techno-physical. Design Studies 19 (1998) 161-186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Searle, J.: The Rediscovery of Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge MA (1992)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Searle, J.: The Construction of Social Reality. Penguin Books, London (1995)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Simon, H.A.: The Sciences of the Artificial (2nd ed.). MIT Press, London (1981)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Thagard, P.: Mind. Introduction to Cognitive Science. MIT Press, Cambridge MA (1996)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tuomela, R.: The Philosophy of Social Practices: A Collective Acceptance View. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vermaas, P., Houkes, W.: Technical functions: a drawbridge between the intentional and structural natures of technical artefacts. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37 (2006) 5-18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    von Wright, G.H.: Practical inference. The Philosophical Review 72 (1963) 159-179Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    von Wright, G.H.: Explanation and Understanding. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1971)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pasi Pohjola
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Social Sciences and PhilosophyUniversity of Jyv¨akyl¨aFinland

Personalised recommendations