Advertisement

A DiffServ Management Scheme Considering the Buffer Traffic Rate in Ubiquitous Convergence Network

  • Hyojun Lee
  • Mintaig Kim
  • Byung-Gi Kim
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4412)

Abstract

Ubiquitous convergence network consists of access networks to provide heterogeneous network services for mobile users. In this paper, we propose a hierarchical policy-based architecture model and the policy procedures based on access networks connected with Ubiquitous convergence networks. We also present a dynamic traffic management scheme which uses DiffServ mechanism and SLA for the management of end-to-end QoS in access networks. At the end of this paper, we will analyze the performance of the proposed schemes through computer simulation.

Keywords

Access Network Mobile User Service Level Agreement Mobile Terminal Core Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Munoz, M., et al.: A New Model for Service and Application Convergence in B3G/4G Networks. IEEE Wireless Communication 11(5), 6–12 (2004)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Politis, C., et al.: Cooperative Networks for the Future Wireless World. IEEE Communications Magazine 42(9), 70–79 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Needham, M.L., Natarajan, N.: QoS in B3G Networks – an Overview. In: Proc. of ICCT’03, April 2004, pp. 1369–1372 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mykoniati, E., et al.: Admission Control for Providing QoS in Diffserv IP Networks: The TEQUILA Approach. IEEE Communications Magazine 41(1), 38–44 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blake, S., et al.: An Architecture for Differentiated Service. IETF RFC 2475 (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cortese, G., et al.: CADENUS: Creation and Deployment of End-User Services in Premium IP Networks. IEEE Communications Magazine 41(1), 54–60 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim, K.: Analysis of Distributed DDQ for QoS Router. ETRI Journal 28(1), 31–44 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhuang, W., et al.: Policy-Based QoS Management Architecture in an Integrated UMTS and WLAN Environment. IEEE Communications Magazine 41(11), 118–125 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marilly, E., et al.: Service Level Agreements: A Main Challenge for Next Generation Networks. In: Proc. of IEEE ECUMN’02, April 2002, pp. 297–304. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yavakar, R., et al.: A Framework for Policy-based Admission Control. RFC2735 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chan, K., et al.: COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning. RFC 3084 (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garcia-Macias, J.A., et al.: Quality of Service and Mobility for the Wireless Internet. Wireless Networks 9(4), 341–352 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alam, M., Prasad, R., Farserotu, J.R.: Quality of Service among IP-based Heterogeneous Networks. IEEE Personal Communications 8(6), 18–24 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hyojun Lee
    • 1
  • Mintaig Kim
    • 1
  • Byung-Gi Kim
    • 2
  1. 1.Mobile Telecommunication Research Division, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI), 161 Gajeong-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-700Korea
  2. 2.School of Computing, Soongsil Univ. 1-1 Sangdo-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 156-743Korea

Personalised recommendations