Skip to main content

Territorial Cohesion — Between Expectations, Disparities and Contradictions

  • Chapter
Book cover Territorial Cohesion

Part of the book series: German Annual of Spatial Research and Policy ((GERMANANNUAL))

Abstract

Current spatial development policy in EU countries has been intensively influenced, in addition to economic and social cohesion, by a new concept — the concept of territorial cohesion (TC). As the term ‘territorial cohesion’ was initially introduced in the political sphere, it has evoked, independently from the process of new treaty ratification, many discussions about the substance of this concept. The task of elaborating the concept and translating it into European policies intensively has occupied politicians, practitioners and academicians since the term “territorial cohesion” first appeared in the proposal for a new treaty. EU informal ministerial meetings on territorial cohesion in Rotterdam (2004) and the Informal Meeting of Ministers for Regional Policy and Territorial Cohesion in Luxemburg (2005) focused on the interlinks between the territorial cohesion concept and the Lisbon-Gothenburg strategy and defined the political direction in the European discussion on this topic. The Luxemburg meeting stressed the importance of stimulating a broad interdisciplinary EU dialogue on territorial cohesion with EU institutions and local and regional actors which would reflect the reality of the delaying fundamental interdisciplinary professional discussion, thus creating the theoretical background for territorial cohesion in terms of a political spatial development concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung (ARL) (2004) Notwendigkeit einer Europäischen Raumentwicklungspolitik. Positionspapier aus der ARL no.60

    Google Scholar 

  • Barroso J M, Verheugen G (2005) Working together for growth and jobs, A new start for the Lisbon Strategy, Communication to the Spring European Council, SEC (2005) 192, SEC(2005) 193, EC Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Battis U et.al. (2005) Ausgestaltung der Raumentwicklung in der Europäischen erfassung, Expertise zur Position der EU-Mitgliederstaaten zur künftigen Aufgabenverteilung zwischen der EU und den Mitgliedstaaten im Bereich der Raumentwicklung, Endbericht, Forschungsauftrag des Bundesamtes für Bauwesen und Raumordnung, Norr Stiefenhofer Lutz, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • BBR, Bundesministerium für erkehr Bau und Wohnungswesen (eds.) (2005) Informelles EU-Ministertreffen zum Thema territorialer Zusammenhalt vom 20.–21. Mai in Luxemburg: Schlussfolgerungen des orsitzes

    Google Scholar 

  • COM (2005) Lisbon Action Plan Incorporating EU Lisbon Programme and Recommendations for Actions to Member States for Inclusion in their National Lisbon Programmes, Companion documents to the Communication to the Spring European Council 2005 / Working together for growth and jobs, 24 final, EC Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • David C H (2005) Zur Konvergenz der nationalen Raumordnungspolitiken Frankreichs und Deutschlands im Post-EUREK-Prozess. In: Raumforschung und Raumordnung, Issue 1/2005 pp 11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • ESPON Coordination Unit (ed.) (2005) In Search of Territorial Potentials, ESPON, Midterm results by spring 2005, [available on Internet: http://www.espon.eu/mmp/online/website/content/publications/98/856/file_319/ESPON_synthesis_report_II.pdf]

    Google Scholar 

  • ESPON (12.07.2005). ESPON 3.2; Spatial Scenarios and Orientations in Relation to the ESDP and EU Cohesion Policy (2004–06), Second Interim Report Part 1, [available on Internet: http://www.espon.lu/online/documentation/projects/ cross_thematic/2705/sir-3.2_part1.pdf]

    Google Scholar 

  • ESPON (12.07.2005) ESPON 3.1; Integrated Tools for European Spatial Development, Final Report Part A, Scientific and Policy Oriented Conclusions of ESPON Results Until September 2004, [available on Internet: http://www.espon.lu/online/documentation/projects/cross_thematic/2229/fr_3.1_part_a.pdf]

    Google Scholar 

  • ESPON (12.07.2005) ESPON Project 2.3.2; Governance of Territorial and Urban Policies from EU to Local Level. [available on Internet: http://www.espon.lu/online/documentation/projects/policy_impact/2785/sir-2.3.2.pdf]

    Google Scholar 

  • ESPON 1.1.1 (2004) The Role, Specific Situation and Potentials of Urban Areas as Nodes of Polycentric Development. Final Report. Stockholm: Nordregio-Nordic Centre for Spatial Development

    Google Scholar 

  • ESPON 2.2.2. (2004a) Pre-Accession Impact Analysis. Third Interim Report. Institute for Regional Development and Structural Planning, Erkner

    Google Scholar 

  • ESPON in progress (2004b) Preliminary results by autumn 2003. European Spatial Planning Observation Network

    Google Scholar 

  • European Community (eds.) (2006) The Territorial State and Perspectives of the European Union Document: Towards a Stronger European Cohesion in the Light of the Lisbon and Gothenburg Ambitions 2006, first draft, Editorial Group 26, European Community, Brussels, June

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Informal Ministerial Meeting on Territorial Cohesion (2005) am 20/21.05.2005 in Luxembourg, Presidency conclusions, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäische Kommission (eds.) (1999) Europäisches Raumentwicklungskonzept (EUREK): Auf dem Wege zu einer räumlich ausgewogenen und nachhaltigen Entwicklung der Europäischen Union. Angenommen beim Informellen Rat der für Raumordnung zuständigen Minister in Potsdam, Luxemburg

    Google Scholar 

  • European Spatial Planning Observation Network (ESPON) (eds.) (2005). In search of territorial potentials. Mid Term Results by Spring 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faludi A (2004) Spatial Planning Traditions in Europe: Their Role in the ESDP Process International Planning Studies, ol. 9, 2–3, 155–172, May–August 2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faludi A (2004a) Territorial Cohesion: A Polycentric Process for a Polycentric Europe. Working Paper Series 2004/03, Research team Governance and Places, University Nijmegen

    Google Scholar 

  • Faludi A (2004b) Territorial Cohesion: Old (French) wine in new Bottles? In: Urban Studies, 41(7), pp 1349–1365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faludi A (2004c) The Open Method of Co-ordination and’ Post-regulatory’ Territorial Cohesion Policy. In: European Planning Studies, vol.12 / no.7, October 2004, pp 1019–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faludi A (2005) Territorial Cohesion: an unidentified poltiical objective-Introduction to the special issue. In: Faludi (ed.) Town Planning Review, Special issue on European territorial cohesion, Issue 76 / no.1, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Faludi A (2005a) Polycentric Territorial Cohesion Policy. In: Town Planning Review, Issue 76(1) 2005, pp 107–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Finka M (2005) Competition and Cooperation — Classification of Instruments. In: Giffinger R (ed.) (2005) Competition between Cities in Central Europe: Opportunities and Risks of Cooperation, ARL/TU Wien/SPECTRA, Hannover, Vienna, Bratislava

    Google Scholar 

  • Finka M (2003) The Future of Industrial Cities and Regions in Central and Eastern Europe. In: IoeR (eds.) (2003) The Future of Industrial Regions in Decline — Conversations between the U.S. and Europe, Dresden, pp 5–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Finka M (2002) The Role of Planning in Increasing Ethical Behaviour. In: Petrikova D (ed.) (2002) Planning, Ethics and Religion II. FA STU Spectra Centre-ROAD, Bratislava, pp 146–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Finka M, Petríková D (eds.) (2000) Spatial Development and Planning in the Context of EU Enlargement, Central European Training Centre in Spatial Planning, Bratislava/Hannover/Newcastle/Grenoble

    Google Scholar 

  • Finka M, Petríková D (2002) Achieving Social Equity Through Effective Spatial Planning Policies and Tools. In: Petríková D (ed.) (2002) Planning, Ethics and Religion II, FA STU Spectra Centre-ROAD, Bratislava, pp 192–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Gestel van T, Faludi A (2005) Towards a European Territorial Cohesion Assessment Network. A bright future for ESPON? In: Town Planning Review, Issue 76(1), pp 81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustedt E (2005) Territorial Cohesion of Europe — From a ague Notion, to Clear Idea, AESOP Conference, ienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall M, Ache P et al. (2006) ESPON 2.2.1, The Territorial Effects of Structural Funds. Third Interim Report, 2004, Nordregio, Mcrit, EPRC, infyde, itps, Systema, [available on Internet: http://www.nordregio.se/espon2.2.1.htm, 1. 5.2006]

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (2004) Employment, economic reforms and social cohesion — towards a Europe based on innovation and knowledge, Document from the presidency 5256/00, Lisbon/Brussels 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Laissy A P (2004) Ministerial Meeting on Territorial Cohesion on 29 November 2004 in Rotterdam CEC 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévy J (2003) Aménagement du territoire. In: Dictionnaire de la géographie et de l’espace des sociétés, Paris-Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévy J, Lussault M (eds.) (2003) Justice spatiale. In: Dictionnaire de la géographie et de l’espace des sociétés, Paris-Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Malchus von V (2005) Strategische Leitbilder für die EU-Kohäsionspolitik, Manuscript

    Google Scholar 

  • MKRO, Hauptausschuss der Ministerkonferenz für Raumordnung (eds.) (2005) Fortentwicklung der Europäischen Raumentwicklungspolitik, 28 April

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (eds.) (2004) European Communities/DG Regional Policy, Interim Territorial Cohesion Report (Preliminary results of ESPON and EU Commission studies). Luxembourg Office for Official Publications of the European Communities

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (eds.) (2004a) Interim Territorial Cohesion Report, Preliminary results of ESPON and EU Commission studies, DG Regional Policy, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Perony J (2005) Territorial cohesion: evolutionary background, implementation in the frame of 2007/2013 EU policies, AG TC ARL-working material, ARL Hannover

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1971) A Theory of Justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön P (2005) Territorial cohesion in Europe. In: Planning Theory and Practice, Issue 6/3, pp 387–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Finka, M. (2007). Territorial Cohesion — Between Expectations, Disparities and Contradictions. In: Scholich, D. (eds) Territorial Cohesion. German Annual of Spatial Research and Policy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71746-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics