Optical Design with Epsilon-Dominated Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm

  • Shaine Joseph
  • Hyung W. Kang
  • Uday K. Chakraborty
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4431)

Abstract

Significant improvement over a patented lens design is achieved using multi-objective evolutionary optimization. A comparison of the results obtained from NSGA2 and ε-MOEA is done. In our current study, ε-MOEA converged to essentially the same Pareto-optimal solutions as the one with NSGA2, but ε-MOEA proved to be better in providing reasonably good solutions, comparable to the patented design, with lower number of lens evaluations. ε-MOEA is shown to be computationally more efficient and practical than NSGA2 to obtain the required initial insight into the objective function trade-offs while optimizing large and complex optical systems.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kidger, M.J.: Intermediate Optical Design. SPIE Press, Bellingham (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vasiljevic, D.: Classical and Evolutionary Algorithms in the Optimization of Optical Sytems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cheng, X., Wang, Y., Hao, Q., Sasian, J.: Automatic element addition and deletion in lens optimization. Applied Optics 42(7), 1309–1317 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Koza, J.R., Al-Sakran, S.H., Jones, L.W.: Automated re-invention of six patented optical lens systems using genetic programming. In: Proc. GECCO, New York, pp. 1953–1960 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bociort, F., Driel, E., Serebriakov, A.: Network structure of the set of local minima in optical system optimization. In: Proc. of SPIE, vol. 5174, pp. 26–34 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deb, K.: Multi-Objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deb, K., Mohan, M., Mishra, S.: A Fast Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm for Finding Well-Spread Pareto-Optimal Solutions. KanGAL Report no. 2003002 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ono, I., Kobayashi, S., Yoshida, K.: Global and Multi-objective Optimization for Lens Design by Real-coded Genetic Algorithms. In: Proc. of SPIE, vol. 3482, pp. 110–121 (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Joseph, S.: Lens Design and Optimization Using Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Missouri-Rolla (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Joseph, S., Kang, H.W., Chakraborty, U.K.: Lens Optimization In A Classical-Evolutionary Hybrid Framework. In: Proc. MENDEL: 12th International Conference on Soft Computing, Brno, Czech Republic, EU (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Coello Coello, C.A., et al.: Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shaine Joseph
    • 1
  • Hyung W. Kang
    • 1
  • Uday K. Chakraborty
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Missouri, St. Louis, One University Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63121USA

Personalised recommendations