Advertisement

Analytical and numerical models for tsunami run-up

  • Per A. Madsen
  • David R. Fuhrman

Summary

The classical analytical solution for the run-up of periodic long waves on an infinitely long slope is presented and discussed. This leads to simple expressions for the maximum run-up and the associated flow velocity in terms of the surf similarity parameter and the amplitude to depth ratio determined at some offshore location. We use these expressions to analyze the impact of tsunamis on beaches and relate the discussion to the recent Indian Ocean tsunami from December 26, 2004. An important conclusion is that the impact is very sensitive to the beach slope. Next, we present a numerical model based on a highly accurate Boussinesq-type formulation. This model incorporates nonlinear and dispersive effects, and is extended to include a moving shoreline. As a first step, the model is verified against the non-dispersive analytical run-up solution, demonstrating good quantitative accuracy. The model is then used to study an idealized three-dimensional nearshore-generated tsunami propagating over a hypothetical sound.

Keywords

Wave Height Edge Wave Indian Ocean Tsunami Beach Slope Tidal Bore 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    J. A. Battjes. Surf similarity. In Proc. 14th Int. Conf. Coastal Engineering, volume 1, pages 466–480. ASCE, 1987.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    G. F. Carrier and H. P. Greenspan. Water waves of finite amplitude on a sloping beach. J. Fluid Mech., 4:97–109, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    D. R. Fuhrman and H. B. Bingham. Numerical solutions of fully non-linear and highly dispersive Boussinesq equations in two horizontal dimensions. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, 44:231–255, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    D. R. Fuhrman, H. B. Bingham, and P. A. Madsen. Nonlinear wave-structure interactions with a high-order Boussinesq model. Coast. Eng., 52:655–672, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    D. R. Fuhrman and P. A. Madsen. Short-crested waves in deep water: a numerical investigation of recent laboratory experiments. J. Fluid Mech., 559:391–411, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    D. R. Fuhrman, P. A. Madsen, and H. B. Bingham. A numerical study of crescent waves. J. Fluid Mech., 513:309–341, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    C. J. Galvin. Breaker type classification on three laboratory beaches. J. Geophys. Res., 73:3651–3659, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    G. Green. On the motion of waves in a variable canal of small depth and width. Trans. Camp. Philos. Soc., 6:457–462, 1838.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    S. T. Grilli, S. Vogelmann, and P. Watts. Development of a 3D numerical wave tank for modeling tsunami generation by underwater landslides. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem., 26:301–313, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    S. T. Grilli and P. Watts. Modeling of waves generated by a moving submerged body. Applications to underwater landslides. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem., 23:645–656, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    S. T. Grilli and P. Watts. Tsunami generation by submarine mass failure. I: Modeling, experimental validation, and sensitivity analysis. J. Waterw. Port C-ASCE, 131:283–297, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    S. Hibberd and D. H. Peregrine. Surf and run-up on a beach: A uniform bore. J. Fluid Mech., 95:323–345, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    D. V. Ho and R. E. Meyer. Climb of a bore on a beach, Part 1: Uniform beach slope. J. Fluid Mech., 14:305–318, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    S. A. Hughes. Estimation of wave run-up on smooth, impermeable slopes using the wave momentum flux parameter. Coast. Eng., 51:1085–1104, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    C. R. Iribarren and C. Nogales. Protection des ports. In XVIIth International Navigation Congress, pages 31–80, 1949. Section II, Communication.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    H. B. Keller, D. A. Levine, and G. B. Whitham. Motion of a bore over a sloping beach. J. Fluid Mech., 7:302–316, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    J. B. Keller. Tsunamis-water waves produced by earthquakes. In Tsunami Hydrodyn. Conf., pages 154–166, Honolulu, 1963. Int. Union Geod. Geophys. Monogr. 24.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Z. Kowalik and I. Bang. Numerical computation of tsunami run-up by the upstream derivative method. Sci. Tsunami Haz., 5:77–84, 1987.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    H. Lamb. Hydrodynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1932.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    P. L.-F. Liu, P. Lynett, H. Fernando, B. E. Jaffe, H. Fritzz, B. Higman, R. Morton, J. Goff, and C. Synolakis. Observations of the International Tsunami Survey Team in Sri Lanka. Science, 308:1595, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    P. Lynett and P. L.-F. Liu. A numerical study of submarine-landslide-generated waves and run-up. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 458:2885–2910, 2002.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    P. Lynett and P. L.-F. Liu. A numerical study of the run-up generated by three-dimensional landslides. J. Geophys. Res., 110: C03006/1-16, 2005.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    P. J. Lynett, T.-R. Wu, and P. L.-F. Liu. Modeling wave runup with depth-integrated equations. Coast. Eng., 46:89–107, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    P. A. Madsen, H. B. Bingham, and H. Liu. A new Boussinesq method for fully nonlinear waves from shallow to deep water. J. Fluid Mech., 462:1–30, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    P. A. Madsen, H. B. Bingham, and H. A. Schäffer. Boussinesq-type formulations for fully nonlinear and extremely dispersive water waves: derivation and analysis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 459:1075–1104, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    P. A. Madsen, D. R. Fuhrman, and B. Wang. A Boussinesq-type method for fully nonlinear waves interacting with a rapidly varying bathymetry. Coast. Eng., 53:487–504, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    P. A. Madsen, H. J. Simonsen, and C.-H. Pan. Numerical simulation of tidal bores and hydraulic jumps. Coast. Eng., 52:409–433, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    C. C. Mei, M. Stiassnie, and D. K.-P. Liu. Theory and Applications of Ocean Surface Waves. World Scientific, Singapore, 2005.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    A. Savitzky and M. J. E. Golay. Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Anal. Chem., 36:1627–1639, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    H. A. Schäffer and I. G. Jonsson. Edge waves revisited. Coast. Eng., 16:349–368, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    M. C. Shen and R. E. Meyer. Climb of a bore on a beach, Part 2: Nonuniform beach slope. J. Fluid Mech., 16:108–112, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    M. C. Shen and R. E. Meyer. Climb of a bore on a beach, Part 3: Run-up. J. Fluid Mech., 16:113–125, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    A. Sielecki and M. G. Wurtele. The numerical integration of the nonlinear shallow-water equations with sloping boundaries. J. Comput. Phys., 6:219–236, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    G. Watson, D. H. Peregrine, and E. F. Toro. Numerical solution of the shallow water equations on a beach using the weighted average flux method. In Computational Fluid Dynamics, volume 1, pages 495–502. Elsevier, 1992.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    P. Watts, S. T. Grilli, D. R. Tappin, and G. J. Fryer. Tsunami generation by submarine mass failure. II: Predictive equations and case studies. J. Waterw. Port C-ASCE, 131:298–310, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    H. H. Yeh, A. Ghazali, and I. Marton. Experimental study of bore run-up. J. Fluid Mech., 206:563–578, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Per A. Madsen
    • 1
  • David R. Fuhrman
    • 1
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentTechnical University of DenmarkKgs. LyngbyDenmark

Personalised recommendations