Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Risk Assessment, Modeling and Decision Support pp 5–81Cite as

A Brief History of Seismic Risk Assessment

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Risk, Governance and Society ((RISKGOSO,volume 14))

Abstract

Seismology and earthquake engineering have rich histories, perhaps due to the fact that earthquakes tend to affect almost everything around us — after all, one can take shelter from a storm, but not from an earthquake. Great minds — Aristotle, Plato, Da Vinci and Kant to name a few — have grappled with the problems of earthquakes. When issues of risk are added to those of earthquakes, the field and history are further enriched (think of adding Pascal, Fermat, Bernoulli, Keynes, etc.), and the challenge of writing a history increased commensurately. The task is daunting — Housner (1984) observed:

“Earthquake engineering is a 20th Century development, so recent that it is yet premature to attempt to write its history ... Although 1984 is too soon to write a definitive history, it is an appropriate time for an historical view of earthquake engineering development to see where we were, where we now are, and where we are going...”

This writer agreed entirely when he heard those words in 1984, but two more decades later the perspective is greatly improved, at least as regards seismic risk assessment. In fact, as we shall see, in many ways we were just on the verge of seismic risk analysis and assessment in 1984, whereas today we have very significant capabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Gov. Wilson puts cost of earthquake in Los Angeles as high as $30 billion. (1994, 21 January 1994). Wall Street Journal, p 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnew DC (2002) History of seismology. In: Lee HK, Kanamori H, Jennings PC, Kisslinger C (eds.), International handbook of earthquake and engineering seismology. Academic Press, New York, pp 3–12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Algermissen ST (1969) Seismic risk studies in the United States. In: Proceedings of the Fourth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago de Chile, pp A1: 14-27

    Google Scholar 

  • Algermissen ST, Hopper M, Campbell K, Rinehart WA, Perkins D, Steinbrugge KV, Lagorlo HJ, Moran DF, Cluff LS, Degenkolb HJ, Duke CM, Gates GO, Jacobson NN, Olson RA, Allan CR (1973) A study of earthquake losses in the Los Angeles, California area. The Federal Disaster Assistance Administration, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Algermissen ST, Perkins DM (1976) A probabilistic estimate of maximum acceleration in rock in the contiguous United States (Open-File Report 76-416). USGS

    Google Scholar 

  • Algermissen ST, Riehart W, Dewey J, Steinbrugge KV, Lagorio HJ, Degenkolb HJ, L S C, McClure FE, Scott S, Gordon RF (1972) A study of earthquake losses in the San Francisco Bay area: Data and analysis. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (1952) Lateral forces of earthquake and wind

    Google Scholar 

  • Applied Technology Council (1978, amended 1982) Tentative provisions for the development of seismic regulations for buildings (ATC-3-06). Applied Technology Council, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Applied Technology Council (1985). Earthquake damage evaluation data for California (ATC-13) Redwood City, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (1999) ASTM E2026 Standard guide for the estimation of building damageability in earthquakes. ASTM International

    Google Scholar 

  • Beavers J (2002). A review of seismic hazard description in us design codes and procedures. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials 4:46–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Menahem A (1995) Review, a concise history of mainstream seismology, origins, legacy, and perspectives. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 85:1202–1225

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein PL (1998) Against the gods: The remarkable story of risk. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Biot MA (1933) Theory of elastic systems under transient loading with an application to earthquake proof buildings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 19:262–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biot MA (1940) A mechanical analyzer for the prediction of earthquake stresses. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 31:151–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume JA (1965) Earthquake ground motion and engineering procedures for important installations near active faults. In: Proceedings of the Proceedings of the Third World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. New Zealand, p 53

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume JA, Newmark NM, Cornell CA (1961). Design of multistory reinforced concrete buildings for earthquake motions. Portlant Cement Association, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson R (1962) Silent spring. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen WF, Scawthorn C (2003) Earthquake engineering handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chick A (1934) Discussion of fundamental factors involved in underwriting of earthquake insurance. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 24:385–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Coats RR (1962) Magma type and crustal structure in the aleutian arc. The crust of the Pacific Basin: Am Geophys Union Geophys Mon 6:92–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane H (1974) Predicting the economic impact of earthquakes. In: Cochrane HC, et al. (eds.), Natural hazards research paper no. 25, Social science perspectives on the coming San Francisco earthquake. University of Colorado, NHRAIC, Boulder, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 58:1583–1606

    Google Scholar 

  • Dacy D, Kunreuther H (1969) The economics of natural disasters. The Free Press (Macmillan), New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan NC (1973) A statistical evaluation of strong motion data: Including the February 9, 1971 San Fernando earthquake. Dames & Moore

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkin ME, Thiel CC (1992) Improving measures to reduce earthquake casualties. Earthquake Spectra 8:95–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EERI. (1994) Henry J. Degenkolb, interviewed by Stanley Scott. Connections, The EERI Oral History Series, from http://www.eeri.org/cds_publications-/oral_histories/0-943198-42-9_Degenkolb.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • EERI (2005) Scenario for a magnitude 6.7 earthquake on the Seattle fault. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland CA

    Google Scholar 

  • EERI (Earthquake Engineering Research Institute). (2004) World housing encyclopedia. (available electronically at http://www.world-housing.net/index.asp)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eguchi RT, Goltz JD, Seligson HA, Flores PJ, Blais NC, Heaton TH, Bortugno E (1997) Real-time loss estimation as an emergency response decision support system: The early post-earthquake damage assessment tool (EPEDAT). Earthquake Spectra 13:815–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison R, Milliman J, Roberts R (1984) Measuring the regional economic effects of earthquakes and earthquake predictions. Journal of Regional Science 24:559–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (1988) Earthquake Damaged Buildings: An Overview of Heavy Debris and Victim Extrication, prepared by C. Scawthorn for the Applied Technology Council under sub-contract to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (ATC 21-2; FEMA 158), Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (1991) Seismic vulnerability and impact of disruption of lifelines in the conterminous United States, prepared by C. Scawthorn and M. Khater for the Applied Technology Council (ATC-25). Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (2006) Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, earthquake model, HAZUS®MH MR2, technical manual, developed by Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Mitigation Division. National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman JR (1930) Engineering data needed on earthquake motion for use in the design of earthquake-resisting structures. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 20:67–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman JR (1932) Earthquake damage and earthquake insurance. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend I, Blume ME (1975) The demand for risky assets. American Economic Review 65:900–922

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher RB (1956) Risk management: A new phase of cost control. Harvard Business Review

    Google Scholar 

  • GSHAP (1998) Global seismic hazard assessment program, closing report to the IDNDR/STC, 1992–1998

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1941) Seismicity of the earth (Vol. 34). Geological Society of America, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1942) Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy, and acceleration. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 32:163

    Google Scholar 

  • Gzovsky MV (1962) Tectonics and earthquake forecasting. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 52:485–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks TC, Kanamori H (1979) A moment magnitude scale. Journal of Geophysical Research 84:2348–2350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess HH (1962) History of ocean basins. Petrologic Studies: A 599–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Housner G (1952) Spectrum intensities of strong motion earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the Proceedings of a Symposium on Earthquakes and Blast Effects on Structures. Los Angeles, pp 21–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Housner GW (1941) Calculating the response of an oscillator to arbitrary ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 31:143–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Housner GW (1952) Intensity of ground motion during strong earthquakes, second technical report under office of naval research contract N6ONR-244, Task Order 25, Project Designation NR-081 — 095. Earthquake Research Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena

    Google Scholar 

  • Housner GW (1958) The mechanism of sandblows. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 48:155–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Housner GW (1984) An historical view of earthquake engineering. In: Proceedings of the 8th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. San Francisco, pp 25–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Insurance Services Office. (2006) Definition of probable maximum loss. from http://www.iso.com/products/2400/prod2453.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Isacks BL, Oliver J, Sykes LR (1968) Seismology and the new global tectonics. Journal of Geophysical Research 73:5855–5899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishimoto M, Iida K (1939). Observations of earthquakes registered with the microseismograph constructed recently. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute of the University of Tokyo 17:443–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs J (1961) The death and life of great American cities. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones BG, Manson DM, Hotchkiss CM, Savonis MJ (1987) Determination of building stocks for urban vulnerability analysis and earthquake loss estimation. Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research, Program in Urban and Regional Studies, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones NP, Noji EK, Krimgold F, Smith GS (eds) (1989). Proceedings of the international workshop on earthquake injury epidemiology for mitigation and response. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashima T (2000) Strong earthquake motion observation in Japan. Building Research Institute, Tsukuba, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawasumi H (1951) Measures of earthquake danger and expectancy of maximum intensity throughout Japan as inferred from the seismic activity in historical times. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute 29:471–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight FH (1921) Risk, uncertainty and profit. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornfield L, Rojahn C, Scawthorn C (2006) Estimated losses from scenario earthquakes affecting San Francisco: CAPSS — part 2. In: Proceedings of the 8th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering. San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Law DG (1997) Chapter 6.0 seismic risk models, part 4: Computer models of probable maximum loss. In: Brun SE, Etkin D, Law DG, Wallace L, White R (eds.), Coping with natural hazards in Canada: Scientific, government and insurance industry perspectives, a study written for the round table on environmental risk, natural hazards and the insurance industry. Environmental Adaptation Research Group, Environment Canada and Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Pichon X (1968) Sea-floor spreading and continental drift. Journal of Geophysical Research 73:661–697

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Pichon X, Heirtzler JR (1968). Magnetic anomalies in the indian ocean and sea-floor spreading continents. Journal of Geophysical Research 73:2101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee HK, Kanamori H, Jennings PC, Kisslinger C (eds) (2002). International handbook of earthquake and engineering seismology. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallet R (1862) Neapolitan earthquake of 1857. The first principles of observational seismology. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallet, R and Mallet, JW (1858). The Earthquake Catalogue of the British Association, with the Discussion, Curves, and Maps, Etc. (Including Seismographic Map of the World, Dated 1857), Taylor and Francis, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance 7:77–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martel RR (1936) A report on earthquake damage to Type III buildings (Special Publication No. 201). U.S. Department of Commerce Coast and Geodetic Survey, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness JS (1969) Is “Probable Maximum Loss” (PML) a useful concept? In: Proceedings of the Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society, pp. 31–39

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire RK (1974) Seismic structural response risk analysis incorporating peak response regressions on earthquake magnitude and distance (Pub. R74-51). MIT, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire RK (1976) Fortran computer program for seismic risk analysis (USGS Series Open-File Report Number 76-6)

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire RK (1978) FRISK-computer program for seismic risk analysis using faults as earthquake sources, (U.S.G.S. Open-File Report, 78-1107)

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne J (1888) The movement produced in certain buildings by earthquakes. Transactions of the Seismological Society of Japan 12:67–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne J (1898) Seismology. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne J, Burton WK (1892) The Great Japan Earthquake of 1891. Lane, Crawford & Co, Yokohama

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne WG, Davenport AG (1969) Distribution of earthquake risk in Canada. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 59:729

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogami T, Kubo K (1953) The behavior of soil during vibration. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, pp 152–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan WJ (1968) Rises, trenches, great faults, and crustal blocks. Journal of Geophysical Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern O, Von Neumann J (1953) Theory of games and economic behavior. J. Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukerjee T (1971) Economic analysis of natural hazards: A preliminary study of adjustments to earthquakes and their costs, working paper 17. Natural Hazards Center, University of Colorado, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Muto K, Bailey RW, Mitchell KJ (1963) Special requirements for the design of nuclear power stations to withstand earthquakes. Proceedings of Institutional Mechanical Engineering 117:155–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nader R. (1965) Unsafe at any speed. New York: Knightsbridge Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academies Press (1999) The impacts of natural disasters: A framework for loss estimation. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmark NM (1967) Design criteria for nuclear reactors subjected to earthquake hazards. Urbana, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigg JM, Eisner RK. (1997) Earthquake response: Intergovernmental structure and policy innovation (keynote paper). Paper presented at the 5th U.S.-Japan Workshop on Urban Earthquake Hazard Reduction, Pasadena

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke, MJ and Liu X (1999) Response of Buried Pipelines Subject to Earthquake Effects, Monograph, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York, Buffalo

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard V (1957) The hidden persuaders. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Petak WJ, Atkisson AA (1982) Natural hazard risk assessment and public policy. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Press NA (1997) Review of recommendations for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: Guidance on uncertainty and use of experts. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen NC (1975) Reactor safety study: An assessment of accident risks in us commercial nuclear power plants. National Technical Information Service

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravindra M (1992) Seismic assessment of chemical facilities under California risk management and prevention program. In: Proceedings of the Proceedings, International Conference on Hazard Identification and Risk Analysis, Human Factors and Human Reliability in Process Safety

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid HF (1910) Elastic rebound theory. Bulletin of the Department of Geological Sciences, University of California 6:92–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitherman RK (1982) Earthquake-caused hazardous materials releases. In: Proceedings of the Hazardous Materials Spills Conference. Milwaukee, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter CF (1935) An instrumental earthquake magnitude scale. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 25:1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts EB, Ulrich FP (1951) Seismological activities of the U.S. Coast and geodetic survey in 1949. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 41:205–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Scawthorn C, Gates WE (1983) Estimation of earthquake losses in Los Angeles: Damage scenarios under varying earthquake research effort. Dames & Moore, Sponsored by U.S. Geological Survey Contract No. 14-08-0001-19822, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Scawthorn C, Yamada Y, Iemura H (1982) A model for urban post-earthquake fire hazard. Disaster: The International Journal of Disaster Studies and Practice (London) 5:125–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnabel P, Seed B (1973) Accelerations in rock for earthquakes in the western united states. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 63:501

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider PJ, Schauer BA (2006) HAZUS® — its development and its future. Natural Hazards Review Special Issue: Multihazards Loss Estimation and HAZUS® edited by C Scawthorn, PJ Schneider, and BA Schauer 7: 40–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholl RE (1974) Statistical analysis of low-rise building damage caused by the San Fernando earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 64:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Seismology Committee SEAoC (1959) Recommended lateral force requirements and commentary. Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangle WE (1987) Pre-earthquake planning for post-earthquake rebuilding (pepper). Southern California Earthquake Preparedness Project, Los Angeles, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbrugge KV (1968) Earthquake hazard in the San Francisco Bay area: A continuing problem in public policy. University of California Institute of Governmental Studies, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbrugge KV (1982) Earthquakes, volcanoes, and tsunamis: An anatomy of hazards. Skandia America Group, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbrugge KV, Moran DF (1954). An engineering study of the southern California earthquake of July 21, 1952 and its aftershocks. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 44:201–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepp JC (1972) Analysis of completeness of the earthquake sample in the Puget Sound area and its effect on statistical estimates of earthquake hazard. In: Proceedings of the First Microzonation Conference, Seattle, WA, pp 897–909

    Google Scholar 

  • Strain RW (1997) Reinsurance. Strain Publishing, Inc., Athens, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC) (1995). Performancebased seismic engineering of buildings. Vision 2000 report (OC #95-9)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes LR (1971) Aftershock zones of great earthquakes, seismicity gaps and prediction. Journal of Geophysical Research 76:8021–8041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney KJ (1997) Impacts of recent disasters on businesses: The 1993 midwest floods and the 1994 Northridge earthquake. In: Jones BG (ed), Economic consequences of earthquakes: Preparing for the unexpected, NCEER SP-0001. Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY, pp 189–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney K, Dahlhamer, JM (1998) Business disruption, preparedness and recovery: Lessons from the Northridge earthquake. In: Proceedings of the NEHRP Conference and Workshop on Research on the Northridge, California Earthquake of January 17, 1994, pp IV-171–IV-178

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2002) 2000 census of population and housing. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2000/index.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadati K (1933) On the travel time of earthquake waves. Geophysical Magazine 7:101–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegener K (1913) Die seism registrierangen am samo-observatorium etc. Nachr Koniglichen Akad Wiss Gottingen, Math-Phys 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigel RL (ed) (1966). Earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis B (1923) Earthquake risk in California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 13:89–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis B (1923) A fault map of California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 13:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JT (1965) A new class of faults and their bearing on continental drift. Nature 207:343–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood HO, Neumann F (1931). Modified Mercalli Intensity scale of 1931. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 21:277–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanev PI (1975) Peace of mind in earthquake country. Chronicle Books, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

    Charles Scawthorn

Authors
  1. Charles Scawthorn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Daniel J. Evans School of Public Affairs, University of Washington, 327 Parrington Hall, Box 353055, Seattle, Washington, 98195-3055, USA

    Ann Bostrom (Associate Dean of Research & Associate Professor) (Associate Dean of Research & Associate Professor)

  2. Georgia Institute of Technology, Center for Geographic Information Systems, College of Architecture, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA

    Steven French  & Sara Gottlieb  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 C. Scawthorn

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scawthorn, C. (2006). A Brief History of Seismic Risk Assessment. In: Bostrom, A., French, S., Gottlieb, S. (eds) Risk Assessment, Modeling and Decision Support. Risk, Governance and Society, vol 14. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71158-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation