Skip to main content

The Use of Telemetry-Evoked Compound Action Potentials (TECAP) in Cochlear Implantation

  • Conference paper
Book cover 4th International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN 2007)

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 13))

  • 2908 Accesses

Abstract

For about 20 years, Cochlear Implants have successfully restored hearing in postlingual deaf or helped to acquire auditory communication in prelingual deaf patients. However, only in recent years Cochlear Implant manufacturers have implemented stimulating and recording protocols for evoked compound action potentials in order to assess auditory nerve function in relation to the implanted device. Along with the principles of stimulation and recording of TECAPs, two cases are presented which highlight their diagnostic value as well as their limitations. While the pooled data obtained from patients are yet too variable to serve as a predictor for individual stimulation strategies, TECAPs are highly useful in intraindividual follow-up of patients in whom Cochlear Implant stimulation currents may vary even after years and who require re-adjustment according to objectively registered neural responses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Moller AR (2006) History of cochlear implants and auditory brainstem implants. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 64:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  2. Geers AE (2006) Factors influencing spoken language outcomes in children following early cochlear implantation. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 64:50–65

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harrison RV, Gordon KA, Mount RJ (2005) Is there a critical period for cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf children? Analyses of hearing and speech perception performance after implantation. Dev Psychobiol 46(3):252–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Papsin BC (2005) Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy. Laryngoscope 115(1 Pt 2 Suppl 106):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zeng FG (2004) Trends in cochlear implants. Trends Amplif 8(1):1–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mylanus EA, Rotteveel LJ, Leeuw RL (2004) Congenital malformation of the inner ear and pediatric cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 25(3):308–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Incesulu A, Kocaturk S, Vural M (2004) Cochlear implantation in chronic otitis media. J Laryngol Otol 118(1):3–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. El-Kashlan HK, Telian SA (2004) Cochlear implantation in the chronically diseased ear. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 12(5):384–6

    Google Scholar 

  9. Das S, Buchman CA (2005) Bilateral cochlear implantation: current concepts. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 13(5):290–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McDermott HJ (2004) Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. Trends Amplif 8(2):49–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Roland PS, Wright CG (2006) Surgical aspects of cochlear implantation: mechanisms of insertional trauma. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 64:11–30

    Google Scholar 

  12. Briggs RJ, Tykocinski M, Stidham K, Roberson JB (2005) Cochleostomy site: implications for electrode placement and hearing preservation. Acta Otolaryngol 125(8):870–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Callanan V, Poje C (2004) Cochlear implantation and meningitis. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 68(5):545–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cafarelli Dees D, Dillier N, Lai WK, von Wallenberg E, van Dijk B, Akdas F, Aksit M, Batman C, Beynon A, Burdo S, Chanal JM, Collet L, Conway M, Coudert C, Craddock L, Cullington H, Deggouj N, Fraysse B, Grabel S, Kiefer J, Kiss JG, Lenarz T, Mair A, Maune S, Muller-Deile J, Piron JP, Razza S, Tasche C, Thai-Van H, Toth F, Truy E, Uziel A, Smoorenburg GF (2005) Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system. Audiol Neurootol 10(2):105–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dillier N, Lai WK, Almqvist B, Frohne C, Muller-Deile J, Stecker M, von Wallenberg E (2002) Measurement of the electrically evoked compound action potential via a neural response telemetry system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 111(5 Pt 1):407–14

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gillespie LN, Shepherd RK (2005) Clinical application of neurotrophic factors: the potential for primary auditory neuron protection. Eur J Neurosci 22(9):2123–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justus Ilgner MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ilgner, J., Döring, W.H., Westhofen, M. (2007). The Use of Telemetry-Evoked Compound Action Potentials (TECAP) in Cochlear Implantation. In: Leonhardt, S., Falck, T., Mähönen, P. (eds) 4th International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN 2007). IFMBE Proceedings, vol 13. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70994-7_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70994-7_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70993-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70994-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics