Advertisement

Simulation and Representation of the Positional Errors of Boundary and Interior Regions in Maps

  • Tomaž Podobnikar
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

The main goal was to describe the positional errors in maps. Although the errors of spatial data are mainly normally distributed, their character often contains admixtures of poorly explained heterogeneities and other uncertainties that are not simply described. Better understanding the error distributions requires performing quantitative and qualitative tests. Portions of the error distributions that can be explained with stochastic behavior were modelled by Monte Carlo simulations. Two principles for the evaluation of projected error models and types were applied: boundary and surface simulation. Both principles address random, locally systematic, and systematic (with the limits at the gross) error distributions. The boundary error was simulated with vector lines and polygons. The surface error was simulated by producing error surfaces that shift every grid point or square-shaped polygon. Visualisations of the simulations include fuzzification process and allow additional understanding of the nature of errors. The study sets were historical maps and land use data derived from them. Additionally we propose a strategy for reconstructing data models and the error models dependent on them.

Keywords

historical maps quality positional error fuzzy boundaries Monte Carlo simulation land use 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aalders HJGL (1996) Quality metrics for GIS. In: Advances in GIS Research II: Proceedings 7th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, 12–16 August 1996. Delft, The Netherlands. Taylor&Francis, London, pp 5B.1–5B.10Google Scholar
  2. Anselin L (2005) Mapping and Geovisualization. In: ACE 592SA Spatial Analysis. Avalable online at http://sal.uiuc.edu/coursesGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernhardsen T (1992) Geographic information Systems. Norwegian Mapping Authority, Viak ITGoogle Scholar
  4. Blakemore M (1984) Generalization and error in spatial databases. Cartographica 21:131-139Google Scholar
  5. Box GEP, Muller ME (1958) A Note on the Generation of Random Normal Deviates. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 29:610-611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown DG, Duh J-D (2004) Spatial simulation for translating from land use to land cover. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 18:35-60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown JD, Heuvelink GBM (2007) The Data Uncertainty Engine (DUE): A software tool for assessing and simulating uncertain environmental variables. Computers&Geosciences 33:172-190Google Scholar
  8. Buckner B (1997) The Nature of Measurement: Part IV-Precision and Accuracy. Professional Surveyor Magazine 17Google Scholar
  9. Burrough P, McDonnell R (1998) Principles of Geographical Information Systems—-Spatial Information Systems and Geostatistics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarke KC, Teague PD (1998) Cartographic symbolization of uncertainty. In: ACSM Annual Conference, 2–3 March 1998. Baltimore, MD, pp 312–323Google Scholar
  11. Cressie NAC (1993) Statistics for Spatial Data. John Wiley&Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Drecki I (2002) Visualisation of Uncertainty in Geographic Data. In: Shi W, Fisher PF, Goodchild MF (eds) Spatial Data Quality. Taylor&Francis, New York, pp. 140-159Google Scholar
  13. Ehlschlaeger CR, Shortridge AM, Goodchild MF (1997) Visualizing Spatial Data Uncertainty Using Animation. Computers&Geosciences 23:387-395Google Scholar
  14. Fisher PF (1994) Probable and Fuzzy concepts of the uncertain viewshed. In: Worboys M (ed) Innovations in GIS 1. Taylor&Francis, London, pp 161-175Google Scholar
  15. Fisher PF (1996) Animation of reliability in computer-generated dot maps and elevation models. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems 23:196-205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giordano A, Veregin H (1994) Il controlo di qualità nei sistemi informativi territoriali (A quality control in GIS, in Italian). il Cardo, VeneziaGoogle Scholar
  17. Hengl T, Walvoort DJJ, Brown A (2002) Pixel and Colour Mixture: GIS Techniques for Visualisation of Fuzzyness and Uncertainty of Natural Resource Inventories. In: Hunter G (ed) Proceedings International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy in Natural Resources and Environmental Science. MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  18. Haining R (2003) Spatial Data Analysis: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  19. Heuvelink GBM (1998) Error Propagation in Environmental Modelling. CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  20. Kanevski M, Maignan M (2004) Analysis and Modelling of Spatial Environmental Data. EPFL PressGoogle Scholar
  21. Khorram S, Biging GS, Chrisman NR, Colby DR, Congalton RG, Dobson JE, Ferguson RL, Goodchild MF, Jensen JR, Mace TH (1999) Accuracy Assessment of Remote Sensing-Derived Change Detection. ASPRS, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  22. Martinoni D, Bernhard LA (1998) Conceptual Framework for Reliable Digital Terrain Modelling. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling ‘98, 11–15 July 1998. Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp 737–750Google Scholar
  23. Molenaar M (1998) An Introduction to the Theory of Spatial Object Modelling for GIS. Taylor&Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Openshaw S, Charlton M, Carver S (1991) Error propagation: a Monte Carlo simulation. In: Masser I and Blackmore M (eds) Handling Geographical Information: Methodology and Potential Applications. Longman, London, pp 78–101Google Scholar
  25. Perkal J (1956) On the ε-Length. Bulletin de l’Académie Polonaise des Sciences 4/7: 399-403Google Scholar
  26. Peterca M, Radošević N, Milosavljević S, Racetin F (1974) Kartografija (Cartography, in Serbo-Croatian). Vojnogeografski institut, BeogradGoogle Scholar
  27. Plewe B (2002) The Nature of Uncertainty in Historical Geographic information. Transactions in GIS 6:431–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Podobnikar T (2005) Production of integrated digital terrain model from multiple datasets of different quality. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 19:69-89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Podobnikar T (2009) Geocoding and quality assessment of Josephine survey maps for the mountainous region in the Triglav National Park. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica 44 (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  30. Rajšp V, Ficko M (1995) Slovenija na vojaškem zemljevidu 1763–1787 (Josephinische Landesaufnahme 1763–1787 für das Gebiet der Republik Slowenien) (Slovenia on a military map, in Slovenian) 1. ZRC SAZU, LjubljanaGoogle Scholar
  31. Robinson AH, Morrison JL, Muehrcke PC, Kimerling AJ, Guptill SC (1995) Elements of Cartography. John Wiley&Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Shi WZ, Ehlers M, Tempfli K (1999) Analytical Modelling of Positional and Thematic Uncertainties in the Integration of Remote Sensing and Geographical Information Systems. Transactions in GIS 3/2:119-136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stopar B, Kuhar M (2003) A study of distorsions of the primary triangulation network of Slovenia. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica 38:43-52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Taylor BN, Kuyatt CE (1994) Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results, NIST Technical Note 1297. U.S. Government Printing Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  35. Wood JD, Fisher PF (1993) Assessing interpolation accuracy in elevation models. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 13:48-56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomaž Podobnikar
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Scientific Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy for Sciences and ArtsLjubljanaSlovenia
  2. 2.Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Vienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations