Skip to main content

Progress in Debris Flow Modeling

  • Chapter
Book cover Progress in Landslide Science

Abstract

The processes of the two major types of debris flow initiation; the bed erosion type and the landslide-induced type, are discussed and the methods to analyze the respective phenomena are introduced. Especially for the landslide-induced type, a new model of liquefaction of the slid earth mass while in motion is introduced. The earth mass is liquefied at the bottom without water supply from the outside and this liquefied layer gets behind the mass as a following debris flow. The reviews of previous investigations on the mechanics of developed debris flow confirms that the two-phase model is influential, in which debris flow consists of the mixture of two continuum media of fluid phase and solid phase. Using this model, developed debris flows are classified into three types from the point of the dominant stresses within flow. The characteristics of the respective types of flow such as the solids concentration distribution, the velocity distribution, the equilibrium sediment transport concentration are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Armanini A, Gregoretti C (2000) Triggering of debris-flow by overland flow; A comparison between theoretical and experimental results. In: Wieczorek GF, Naeser ND (eds) Debris flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction, and assessment; Proceedings International Conference, Taipei, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 117–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Armanini A, Dalri C, Fraccarolo L, Larcher M, Zorin E (2003) Experimental analysis of the general features of uniform mud-flow. In: Rickenmann D, Chen CL (eds) Debris flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction, and assessment. Proceedings International Conference, Davos, Millpress, Rotterdam, pp 423–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashida K, Takahashi T, Mizuyama T (1977) Study on the initiation of motion of sand mixtures in a steep slope channel. J JSECE 29(4):6–13 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagnold RA (1954) Experiments on a gravity-free dispersion of large solid spheres in a Newtonian fluid under shear. Proc R Soc London, Ser A 225:49–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagnold RA (1957) The flow of cohesionless grains in fluid. Philos Trans R Soc London, Ser A 249:235–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagnold RA (1966) The shearing and dilatation of dry sand and’ singing’ mechanism. Proc R Soc London, Ser A 295:219–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell CS (1990) Rapid granular flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 22:57–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell CS (2001) Granular flows in the elastic limit. Spec Publs Int Ass Sediment 31:83–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell CS, Brennen CE (1985) Computer simulation of granular shear flows. J Fluid Mech 151:167–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CL (1988) Generalized viscoplastic debris flow. J Hydraul Eng-ASCE 114(3):237–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coussot P (1995) Structural similarity and transition from Newtonian to non-Newtonian behavior for clay-water suspensions. Phys Rev Lett 74:3971–3974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotoh H, Sakai T (1997) Numerical simulation of sheetflow as granular materials. J Waterw Port C Div 123(6):329–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotoh H, Tsujimoto T, Nakagawa H (1994) Numerical model of interface momentum transfer and interparticle collision in bedload layer. In: Proceedings APD-IAHR, pp 565–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirano M, Hashimoto H, Fukutomi K, Taguma K, Pallu MS (1992) Nondimensional parameters governing hyperconcentrated flow in an open channel. J Hydraul Eng-ASCE 36:221–226 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM (1997) The physics of debris flows. Rev Geophys 35(3):245–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM, Denlinger RP (1987) The physics of debris flows-a conceptual assessment. In: Beschesta et al. (ed.) Erosion and sedimentation in the Pacific rim. IAHS publ. 165:155–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM, Denlinger RP (2001) Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three-dimensional terrain. J Geophys Res 106(B1):537–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson AM (1965) A model for debris flow. Ph.D. Dissertation Pa. State Univ., State College

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson AM (1970) Physical processes in geology. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Julien PY, O’Brien JS (1997) On the importance of mud and debris flow rheology in structural design. In: Proceedings 1st Inter-national Conference on Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment, New York, ASCE, pp 350–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieger JS (1972) Rheology of monodisperse lattices. Advance of Colloid Interface Science 3:111–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips RJ, Armstrong RC, Brown RA, Graham AL, Abbot JR (1992) A constitutive equation for concentrated suspensions that accounts for shear-induced particle migration. Phys Fluids A4(1):30–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabo Technical Center (1998) Reality of sediment disasters in 1997. pp 25–27 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Straub S (2001) Bagnold revisited: implications for the rapid motion of high-concentration sediment flows. Spec Publs Int Ass Sediment 31:91–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T (1978) Mechanical characteristics of debris flow. J Hydr Eng Div-ASCE 104:1153–1169

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T (1991) Debris flow. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T (1999) Mechanics of viscous debris flow. In: Takahashi (ed) Japan-China joint research on the mechanism and the countermeasures for the viscous debris flow. Research report of Group C3 of special project associated with IDNDR sponsored by Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan, pp 64–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T (2000) Initiation and flow of various types of debrisflow. In: Wieczorek GF, Naeser ND (ed) Debris flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction, and assessment. Proceedings International Conference, Taipei, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 15–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T (2004) Mechanics and countermeasures for debris flow. Kinmiraisha, Nagoya (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T, Nakagawa, H (1994) Natural dam formation and the disaster-a possible explanation of one extreme event. In: Proceedings International Workshop on Floods and Inundations related to Large Earth Movements, A8.1–A8.12

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T, Satofuka Y (2002) Generalized theory of stony and turbulent muddy debris-flow and its practical model. J JSECE 55(3):33–42 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T, Tsujimoto H (1997) Mechanics of granular flow in inclined chute. J Hydraul Coast Environ Eng JSCE 565:57–71 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T, Nakagawa H, Satofuka Y (2000) Newtonian fluid model for viscous debris-flow. In: Wieczorek GF, Naeser ND (ed) Debris flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction, and assessment. Proceedings International Conference, Taipei, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 255–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T, Nakagawa H, Satofuka Y, Kawaike K (2001) Flood and sediment disasters triggered by 1999 rainfall in Venezuela; a river restoration plan for an alluvial fan. J Natural Disaster Science, JSNDS 23(2):65–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T, Satofuka Y, Kashimoto S (2003) Motion of landslideinduced debris flow. In: Rickenmann D, Chen CL (eds) Debris flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction, and assessment; Proceedings International Conference, Davos, Millpress, Rotterdam, pp 399–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Tognacca C, Bezzola GR, Minor HE (2000) Threshold criterion for debris-flow initiation due to channel-bed failure. In: Wieczorek GF, Naeser ND (ed) Debris flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction, and assessment. Proceedings International Conference, Taipei, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 89–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Yano K, Daido A (1965) Fundamental study on mud-flow. Bull Disaster Prev Res Inst Kyoto Univ 14:69–83

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Takahashi, T. (2007). Progress in Debris Flow Modeling. In: Sassa, K., Fukuoka, H., Wang, F., Wang, G. (eds) Progress in Landslide Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70965-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics