Skip to main content

Experiments on Generating Questions About Facts

  • Conference paper
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4394))

Abstract

This paper presents an approach to the problem of factual Question Generation. Factual questions are questions whose answers are specific facts: who?, what?, where?, when?. We enhanced a simple attribute-value (XML) language and its interpretation engine with context-sensitive primitives and added a linguistic layer deep enough for the overall system to score well on user satisfiability and the ’linguistically well-founded’ criteria used to measure up language generation systems. Experiments with open-domain question generation on TREC-like data validate our claims and approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Charniak, E.: Immediate-head parsing for language models. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 116–123. Association for Computational Linguistics (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Charniak, E., Johnson, M.: Coarse-to-fine n-best parsing and maxent discriminative reranking. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’05), pp. 173–180. Association for Computational Linguistics (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dale, R., Scott, D., di Eugenio, B.: Special issue on natural language generation. Computational Linguistics 24(3), 346–353 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S., Louwerse, M.M., Cai, Z.: Coh-metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 36(2), 193–202 (2004a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Graesser, A.C., Lu, S., Jackson, G.T., Mitchell, H., Ventura, M., Olney, A., Louwerse, M.M.: Autotutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 180–193 (2004b)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Graesser, A.C., Olde, B.: How does one know whether a person understands a device? the quality of the questions the person asks when the device breaks down. Journal of Educational Psychology 95, 524–536 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Graesser, A.C., Person, N.: Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal 31, 104–137 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Graesser, A.C., VanLehn, K., Rose, C.P., Jordan, P.W., Harter, D.: Intelligent tutoring systems with conversational dialogue. AI Magazine 22(4), 39–52 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hermjakob, U., Echihabi, A., Marcu, D.: Natural language based reformulation resource and web exploitation for question answering (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hoshino, A., Hiroshi, N.: A real-time multiple-choice question generation for language testing: A preliminary study. In: Burstein, J., Leacock, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Building Educational Applications Using NLP, June, pp. 17–21. The Association for Computational Linguistics (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mauldin, M.L.: Chatterbots, tinymuds, and the turing test: entering the loebner prize competition. In: Proceedings of the twelfth national conference on Artificial intelligence, vol. 1, Seattle, Washington, United States, pp. 16–21. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. McKeown, K.R.: Paraphrasing questions using given and new information. American Journal of Computational Linguistics 9(1), 1–9 (1983)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Miller, G.: Wordnet: A lexical database. Communications of the ACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mitkov, R., Ha, L.A.: Computer-aided generation of multiple-choice tests. In: Burstein, J., Leacock, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL 2003 Workshop on Building Educational Applications Using Natural Language Processing, Edmonton, Canada, May, pp. 17–22. The Association for Computational Linguistics (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reiter, E., Dale, R.: Building Natural Language Generation Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Soricut, R., Marcu, D.: Towards developing generation algorithms for text-to-text applications. In: Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics Conference (ACL-2005), Ann Arbor, MI, June, pp. 25–30 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Susarla, S., Adcock, A., Van Eck, R., Moreno, K., Graesser, A.C.: Development and evaluation of a lesson authoring tool for autotutor. In: Aleven, V., et al. (eds.) AIED 2003 Supplemental Proceedings, Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney School of Information Technologies, pp. 378–387 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Theune, M., Klabbers, E., de Pijper, J-R., Krahmer, E., Odijk, J.: From data to speech: A general approach. Natural Language Engineering 7(1), 47–86 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. van Deemter, K., Krahmer, E., Theune, M.: Real versus template-based natural language generation: A false opposition? Computational Linguistics 31(1), 15–23 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. van Deemter, K., Odijk, J.: Context modelling and the generation of spoken discourse. Speech Communication 21(1/2), 101–121 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. VanLehn, K., Graesser, A.C., Jackson, G.T., Jordan, P., Olney, A., Rose, C.P.: When is reading just as effective as one-on-one interactive tutoring? In: Bara, B. (ed.) Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meetings of the Cognitive Science Society, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Voorhees, E.M.: Overview of TREC 2001. In: Text REtrieval Conference (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wallace, R.: Be Your Own Botmaster. ALICE A. I. Foundation (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Weizenbaum, J.: Communications of the ACM 9(1), 36–35 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wisher, R.A., Graesser, A.C.: Question asking in advanced distributed learning environments. In: Fiore, S.M., Salas, E. (eds.) Toward a science of distributed learning and training, American Psychological Association, Washington (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zock, M.: Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, chapter Sentence generation by pattern matching: the problem of syntactic choice. In: Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, pp. 317–352. Benjamins, Amsterdam (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jurafsky, D., Martin, J.: Speech and Language Processing. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Alexander Gelbukh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rus, V., Cai, Z., Graesser, A.C. (2007). Experiments on Generating Questions About Facts. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4394. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70939-8_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70939-8_39

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70938-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70939-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics