In the preceding chapter, I examined alternative models of enterprise restructuring and relationships between CSR, corporate governance and firm performance. Draw ing on the models and theories from the literature, in this Chapter, the theoretical framework and the hypotheses are developed. In Sect. 4.1, the theoretical framework is set up based on the stakeholder theory, and Sect. 4.2 describes the hypotheses with regard to relationships between corporate social performance (CSP) and financial performance (FP) during pre- and post-restructuring.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aghion, P., Blanchard, O. J., & Carlin W. (1997). “The Economics of Enterprise Restructuring in Central and Eastern Europe,” in Property Relation, Incentives and Welfare, J. E. Roemer, ed. London: The Macmillan Press.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-Behavior Relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888–918.
Alkafaji, A. F. (1989). A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Governance: Managing in A Dynamic Environment. New York, NY: Quorum.
Aupperle, Kenneth E., Archie B. Carroll, & John D. Hatfield (1985). An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446.
Becker, E. R., & Potter, S. J. (2002). Organizational Rationality, Performance, and Social Respon sibility: Results from the Hospital Industry. Journal of Health Care Finance, 29(1), 23–48.
Blair, M. (1995). Ownership and Control. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2003). Business & Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Manage ment. Mason, OH: South-Western Educational Publishing
Clarkson, Max E. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.
Cornell, B., & Shapiro, A. C. (1987). Corporate Stakeholders and Corporate Finance. Financial Management, 16, 5–14.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social Cognition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Perspective. Boston, MA; Engle-wood Cliffs, Pitman, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Katz, D. (1960). The Functional Approach to the Study of Attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24(2), 163–204.
Kelly, G., & J. Parkinson (1998). The Conceptual Foundations of the Company: A Pluralist Approach. Company, Financial and Insolvency Law Review, 2(2), 174–197.
Kraft, K., & Jerald, H. (1990). Strategy, Social Responsibility and Implementation. Journal of Business Ethics, (9), 11–19.
McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872.
Posner, B., & Schmidt, W. (1992). Values and the American Managers: An Update Updated. California Management Review, 25(2), 80–94.
Preston, L. E., Sapienza, H., Miller, R., Amatai, E., & Paul, L. (1991). “Stakeholders, Shareholders, Managers: Who Gains What from Corporate Performance?,” in Social-Economics: Toward a New Synthesis, A. Etzioni, & P. R. Lawrence, eds., pp. 149–165, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Slinger, G., & Deakin S. (2000). “Company Law: An Instrument for Inclusion-Regulating Stakeholder Relations in Takeover Situations,” in Social Inclusion: Possibilities and Tensions, A. Stewart, & P. Askonas, eds. London: Macmillan.
Vance, S. C. (1975). Are Socially Responsible Corporations Good Investment Risks? Management Review, 64(8), 18–24.
Weidenbaum, M., & Vogt, S. (1987). Takeovers and Stockholders: Winners and Losers. California Management Review, 29(4), 47–168.
Williamson, O. E. (1967). The Economics of Discretionary Behavior: Managerial Objectives in a Theory of the Firm: Chicago, IL: Markham.
Wood, D. J. (1991). Social Issues in Management: Theory and Research in Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Management, 17(2), 383–406.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2009). Theoretical Framework and Hypotheses. In: Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Restructuring and Firm's Performance. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70896-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70896-4_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70895-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70896-4
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)