Skip to main content

Verifying Generalized Soundness of Workflow Nets

  • Conference paper
Perspectives of Systems Informatics (PSI 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4378))

Abstract

We improve the decision procedure from [10] for the problem of generalized soundness of workflow nets. A workflow net is generalized sound iff every marking reachable from an initial marking with k tokens on the initial place terminates properly, i.e. it can reach a marking with k tokens on the final place, for an arbitrary natural number k. Our new decision procedure not only reports whether the net is sound or not, but also returns a counterexample in case the workflow net is not generalized sound. We report on experimental results obtained with the prototype we made and explain how the procedure can be used for the compositional verification of large workflows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: The Application of Petri Nets to Workflow Management. The Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers 8(1), 21–66 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. van der Aalst, W.M.P., van Hee, K.M.: Workflow Management: Models, Methods, and Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bagnara, R., Hill, P., Zaffanela, E.: The Parma Polyhedra Library user’s manual. Department of Mathematics, University of Parma, Italy. http://www.cs.unipr.it/ppl/Documentation

  4. Bagnara, R., et al.: Possibly not closed convex polyhedra and the Parma Polyhedra Library. In: Hermenegildo, M.V., Puebla, G. (eds.) SAS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2477, pp. 213–229. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Berthelot, G.: Verification de Reseaux de Petri. PhD thesis, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Commoner, F.: Deadlocks in Petri Nets. Report CA-7206-2311, Applied Data Research, Inc., Wakefield, Massachusetts (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  7. de Frutos Escrig, D., Johnen, C.: Decidability of home space property. Technical report, Univ. de Paris-Sud, Centre d’Orsay, Laboratoire de Recherche en Informatique Report LRI–503 (July 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Desel, J., Esparza, J.: Free Choice Petri nets. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 40. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. van Hee, K., Sidorova, N., Voorhoeve, M.: Soundness and separability of workflow nets in the stepwise refinement approach. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Best, E. (eds.) ICATPN 2003. LNCS, vol. 2679, pp. 337–356. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. van Hee, K., Sidorova, N., Voorhoeve, M.: Generalized soundness of workflow nets is decidable. In: Cortadella, J., Reisig, W. (eds.) ICATPN 2004. LNCS, vol. 3099, pp. 197–216. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mayr, E.W.: An algorithm for the general Petri net reachability problem. In: Conference Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computation, STOC’1981, pp. 238–246. ACM Press, New York (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Murata, T.: Petri nets: Properties, analysis and applications. Proceedings of the IEEE 7(4), 541–580 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Ping, L., Hao, H.: On 1-soundness and soundness of workflow nets. In: Third Workshop on Modelling of Objects, Components, and Agents Aarhus, Denmark, October 11-13, 2004, pp. 21–36 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Post, R.: YASPER Petri net editor. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University Eindhoven, The Netherlands, http://www.yasper.org

  15. Reutenauer, C.: The mathematics of Petri nets. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Schrijver, A.: Theory of Linear and Integer Programming. Wiley-Interscience series in discrete mathematics. Wiley, Chichester (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Tiplea, F.L., Marinescu, D.C.: Structural soundness for workflow nets is decidable. Information Processing Letters 96(2), 54–58 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Vogler, W.: Behaviour preserving refinement of Petri nets. In: Tinhofer, G., Schmidt, G. (eds.) WG 1986. LNCS, vol. 246, pp. 82–93. Springer, Heidelberg (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vogler, W.: Modular Construction and Partial Order Semantics of Petri Nets. LNCS, vol. 625. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Irina Virbitskaite Andrei Voronkov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

van Hee, K., Oanea, O., Sidorova, N., Voorhoeve, M. (2007). Verifying Generalized Soundness of Workflow Nets. In: Virbitskaite, I., Voronkov, A. (eds) Perspectives of Systems Informatics. PSI 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4378. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70881-0_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70881-0_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70880-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70881-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics