Advertisement

The CineLingua Approach: Verbal and Non-verbal Features in Second Language Acquisition. Film Narrative to Anchor Comprehension and Production

  • Rosa Volpe
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5042)

Abstract

This study has as a central focus a foreign language classroom environment that makes daily use of multimedia film lessons in the target language. More specifically this study explores whether first-semester, first-year college students of Italian will understand film narrative, and how, the comprehension of the film narrative will affect their written production. Eighty-one first year college students participated in this study. The results suggest that the Anchored Learning Group performed better than the Basic-Skills Learning Group in the comprehension tasks of the two film segments. The second experimental probe, consisting in a production task, shows that compared to the Basic-Skills Learning Group, the written productions of the Anchored Learning Group reflect far better the structure of the narrative discourse participants have been exposed to. On the occasion of this production task, students were required to write their essay using at least ten Italian verbs.

Keywords

Verbal and non-verbal information second language acquisition anchored instruction multimedia film narrative linguistic analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Zacks, J.M., Speer, N.K., Swallow, K.M., Braver, T.S., Reynolds, J.R.: Event Perception: A Mind-Brain Perspective. Psychological Bulletin 133(2), 273–293 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lakoff, G.: Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. The University of Chicago Press (1987)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shridar, S.N.: Cognition and Sentence Production. A Cross Linguistic Study. Springer, New York (1985)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Osgood, E.C., et Bock, K.J.: Salience and Sentencing: Some Production Principles. In Sentence Production. Developments in Research and Theory. Sheldon Rosenberg. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Hillsdale (1977)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Waltz, D.L.: On the Interdependence of Language and Perception. In: Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing 2. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. July 25-27 (1978)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jackendoff, R.: An Argument on the Composition of Conceptual Structures. In: Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing 2, July 25-27, 1978, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (1978)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schlesinger, I.M.: Production and Comprehension of Utterances. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1977)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Osgood, E.C.: Lectures on Language Performance. Springer, New York (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ferretti, T.R., McRae, K., Hatherell, A.: Integrating Verbs, Situation Schemas, and Thematic Role Concepts. Journal of Memory and Language 44, 516–547 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Parisi, D.: Elementi di Grammatica. Editore Boringhieri, Torino (1973)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pasolini, P.P.: Empirismo Eretico. Saggi Edn. Garzanti (1972)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Underwood, G., Jebbett, L., Roberts, K.: Inspecting pictures for information to verify a sentence: Eye movements in general encoding and in focus search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 57A(1), 165–182 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Badecker, W.: On Some Proposals Concerning the Status of Predicate Argument Structure Representations. Brain and Language 40, 373–383 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Canseco-Gonzales, E.: Predicate-Argument Structure as a Link between Linguistic and Non Linguistic Representations. Brain and Language 39, 391–404 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt, The Jasper Series as an Example of Anchored Instruction: Theory, Program, Description, and Assessment Data. Educational Psychologist 27(3), 291–315 (1992)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Colin, M.: Structures Syntaxiques du Message Filmique. Documents de Travail. Centro Internazionale di Semiotica e di Linguistica. Univesità di Urbino. Settembre-Ottobre (1983,1985)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cordier, F., Pariollaud, F.: From the choice of the patients for a transitive verb to its polysemy. Current Psychology Letters 21(1) (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosa Volpe
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Letters and Human Sciences and French as a Foreign LanguageUniversity of Perpignan Via DomitiaPerpignanFrance

Personalised recommendations