Advertisement

Organizational Integrity — Understanding the Dimensions of Ethical and Unethical Behavior in Corporations

  • Guido Palazzo
Chapter

Abstract

Organizational integrity refers to the ethical integrity of the individual actors, the ethical quality of their interaction as well as that of the dominating norms, activities, decision making procedures and results within a given organization. This article discusses these manifold aspects of organizational integrity and outlines the main driving forces and dimensions of ethical and unethical behavior in corporations. Reflections on ethics in general start with the assumption that it has to do with human actors who do or omit something. It has to do with their motives and the product of their interrelated activities. Thus, the individual might be regarded as the main point of reference for analyzing organizational integrity. However, the ongoing formalization and institutionalization of the ethical dimension of management is based on a simple observation: Organizational integrity goes beyond managerial integrity and is more than the presence of individuals with good characters within the organization. Having “good” managers is certainly a precondition for organizational integrity, but it does not prevent organizations from obtaining bad ethical results. It is possible to take the bad apples out of the barrel but the risk of deviant organizational behavior will not be reduced to zero. The good apples might develop a bad taste and sometimes it might be a problem of the barrel itself.

Keywords

Business Ethic Moral Reasoning Unethical Behavior Moral Development Ethical Climate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antonakis, J. and Atwater, L. 2002. Leader distance: A review and a proposed theory. The Leadership Quarterly 13: 673–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonakis, J. and House, R.J. 2002. The full-range leadership theory: The way forward. In B.J. Avolio and F.J. Yammarino (Eds), Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead. Amsterdam: JAI: 3–33Google Scholar
  3. Arendt, Hannah, 1994 [1963]. Eichmann in Jerusalem. A Report on the Banality of Evil. Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  4. Ashforth, B.E. and Gibbs, B.W. 1990. The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2): 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Astley, W.G. and Zammuto, R.F. 1992. Organization science, managers, and language games. Organization Science, 3(4): 443–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Badaracco, J.L. and Webb, A.P. 1995. Business Ethics: A view from the trenches. California Management Review 37(2): 8–25.Google Scholar
  7. Brass, D.J.; Butterfield, K.D. and Skaggs, B.C. 1998. Relationship and unethical behavior: A social network perspective. Academy of Management Review 23(1): 14–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlson, D.S. and Perrewe, P.L. 1995. Institutionalization of organizational ethics through transformational leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 14: 829–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ciulla, J.B. 2004. Ethics, the heart of leadership. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Dickson, M.W., Smith, B.D., Grojean, M.W. and Erhardt, M. 2001. An organizational climate regarding ethics: The outcome of leader values and the practice that reflect them. Leadership Quarterly, 12: 197–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dörner, D. 1992. Logik des Misslingens. Hamburg: Rororo.Google Scholar
  12. Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J. and Sutton, R.I. 2005. Economic language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30: 8–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frey, B.S. 1997, Not just for the money: An economic theory of personal motivation. Cheltenham, UK.: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  14. Ghoshal, S. and P. Moran: 1996, ‘Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory’, Academy of Management Review 21(1), pp. 13–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78:1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greenberg, J. 1993. Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organizational and Human Decision Processes, 54, 81–103CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. Greenberg, J. 2002. Who stole the money, and when? Individual and situational determinants of employee theft. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 89: 985–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heyvaert, V. 1999. Reconceptualizing risk assessment. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 8(2): 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Howell, J.M. and Avolio, B.J. 1992. The ethics of charismatic leadership: submission or liberation? Academy of Management Executive, 6, 43–54.Google Scholar
  20. Kohlberg, L. 1981. Essays on moral development. Moral stages and the idea of justice. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  21. Jackson, S.E. and Dutton, J.E. 1988. Discerning threats and opportunities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33: 370–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. James, H.S. 2000. Reinforcing ethical decision making through organizational structure. Journal of Business Ethics 28: 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lerner, L.D. and Fryxell, G.E. 1994. CEO stakeholder attitudes and corporate social activity in the Fortune 500. Business & Society, 33(1): 58–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Levine, D.P. 2005. The corrupt organization. Human Relations, 58(6): 723–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ley Toffler, B. 2003. Final accounting. Ambition, greed and the fall of Arthur Andersen. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
  26. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H. and Schoorman, F.D. 1995. An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust’, Academy of Management Review 20(3), 709–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mintzberg, H. 2004. Managers not MBAs. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Pub.Google Scholar
  28. Morrison, E.W. and Robinson, S. 1997. When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review 22(1): 226–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mowday, R.T. 2004. Review of Managers not MBAs: A hard look at the soft practice of managing and management development. Academy of Management Executive 18(4): 160–166.Google Scholar
  30. Oestreich, J.E. 2002. What can business do to appease anti-globalization protestors? Business and Society Review, 107(2): 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Paine, L.S.: 1994. Managing for organizational integrity. Harvard Business Review, 72(2): 106–117.Google Scholar
  32. Paine, L.S. 1996. Moral thinking in management: An essential capability. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6: 477–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Parker, C. 2002. The open corporation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Parry, K.W. and Proctor-Thompson, S.B. 2002. Perceived integrity of transformational leaders in organisational settings. Journal of Business Ethics 35: 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peterson, D.K. 2002. Deviant workplace behaviour and the organization’s ethical climate. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(1): 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Porter, M.E. and Kramer, M.R. 2002. The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, December: 57–68.Google Scholar
  37. Ramus, C.A. 2001. Organizational support for employees: Encouraging creative ideas for environmental sustainability. California Management Review 43(3): 85–105.Google Scholar
  38. Rawlinson, P. 2002. Capitalists, criminals and oligarchs — Sutherland and the new “Robber Barons”. Crime, Law & Social Change, 37: 293–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ring, P.S. and Rands, G.P. 1989. Sensemaking, understanding, and committing: Emergent interpersonal transaction processes in the evolution of 3M’s microgravity research program. In: A.H. Van den Ven, H.L. Angle and M.S. Poole (eds), Research on the management of innovation. The Minnesota studies, New York: Ballinger: 337–366.Google Scholar
  40. Rossouw, G.J. 1998. Establishing moral business culture in newly formed democracies. Journal of Business Ethics, 17: 1563–1571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Seidman, G.W. 2003. Monitoring multinationals: Lessons from the Anti-Apartheid era. Business & Society, 31(3): 381–406.Google Scholar
  42. Sims, R.R. and Brinkmann, J. 2003. Enron Ethics (Or: culture matters more than codes). Journal of Business Ethics, 45: 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smircich, L. and Stubbart, C. 1985. Strategic management in an enacted world. Academy of Management Review, 10: 724–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Swanson, D.L. 1999. Towards an integrative theory of business and society: a research strategy for corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 24(3): 506–521.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  45. Tonge, A., Greer, L. and Lawton, A. 2003. The Enron story. Business Ethics: A European Review, 12(1): 4–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Trevino, L. 1996. Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3): 601–617.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  47. Trevino, L., Hartman, L. and Brown, M. 2000. Moral person and moral manager: How executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review 42: 128–142.Google Scholar
  48. Trevino, L.K., Brown, M. and Hartman, L.P. 2003. A qualitative investigation of perceived executive leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations 56(1): 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Waddock, S. 2005. Corporate responsibility, accountability and stakeholder relationship: will voluntary action suffice? In J.P. Doh and S. Stumpf (eds.), Handbook on responsible leadership and governance in global business. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar: 180–194.Google Scholar
  50. Waldman, D.A. and Siegel, D. 2005. The influence of CEO transformational leadership on firm-level commitment to corporate social responsibility. In J.P. Doh and S. Stumpf (eds.), Handbook on responsible leadership and governance in global business. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar: 195–220.Google Scholar
  51. Walsh, J.P. and Ungson, G.R. 1991. Organizational Memory. Academy of Management Review, 16: 57–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weaver, G.R., Trevino, L.K. and Cochran, P.L. 1999. Corporate Ethics Programs as Control Systems: Influences of Executive Commitment and Environmental Factors. Academy of Management Journal 42(1): 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weick, K.E. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Werre, M. 2003. Implementing corporate responsibility — The Chiquita case. Journal of Business Ethics, 44: 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wittgenstein, L. 1999 [1921]. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Mineola NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  56. Wolfe Morrison, E. and Robinson, S.L. 1997. When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22(1): 226–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zimbardo, P.G. 2004. A situationist perspective on the psychology of evil: Understanding how good people are transformed into perpetrators. In: A. Miller (ed.) The social psychology of good and evil: Understanding our capacity for kindness and cruelty. New York: Guilford: 21–50.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guido Palazzo
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LausanneLausanne

Personalised recommendations