Global Public Rules and Citizenship Rights: A New Responsibility of Private Business Firms?

  • Andreas G. Scherer
  • Guido Palazzo
  • Dorothée Baumann


Economic activities require the existence of rules and their enforcement as preconditions that the market cannot generate itself. Property rights, contractual rights and obligations are minimal conditions that in modern societies are provided and enforced by the state. Without such rules, the market cannot flourish. The state thus determines regulations and delineates the sphere of private freedom, within which individual citizens and private institutions are entitled to conclude contracts amongst each other but are as well forced to abide by the contracted rules. In line of the development of modern nation states, the state has not only been the guarantor of civil rights, e.g. the right to own property, to enter into private contracts, and to engage in market activity. In its role as a democratic constitutional state it has also been the guarantor of political participation rights, the right of the citizen to take part in the processes to determine public rules and issues of public concern. Finally, in its role as a welfare state it has provided social rights for citizens, such as the right to education, to healthcare and welfare (Marshall, 1965). The combination of state-guaranteed civil, political, and social rights provided modern society with welfare, legitimacy and solidarity, thereby contributing to peacefully stabilize the community of anonymous individuals (Habermas, 2001). Following Matten and Crane (2005) we refer to this triad of rights as citizenship rights.


Corporate Social Responsibility Business Ethic Civil Society Corporate Governance Stakeholder Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Avi-Yonah, R.S. 2000. “Globalization, Tax Competition, and the Fiscal Crisis of the Welfare State,” Harvard Law Review, 113: 1575–1676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avi-Yonah, R.S. 2003. “National Regulation of Multinational Enterprises: An Essay on Comity, Extraterritoriality, and Harmonization,” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 42: 5–34.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, U. 2000. What is Globalization? Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bhagwati, J. 2002. Free Trade Today. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Braithwaite, J., and P. Drahos. 2000. Global Business Regulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cavanagh, G.F. 2004. “Global Business Ethics: Regulation, Codes or Self-Restraint.” Business Ethics Quarterly 14: 625–642.Google Scholar
  7. DeGeorge, R.T. 1993. Competing with Integrity in International Business. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Donaldson, T. 1989. The Ethics of International Business. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Donaldson, T. and T. Dunfee. 1999. Ties That Bind. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Donaldson, T. and L.E. Preston. 1995. “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications.” Academy of Management Review 20: 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Driver, C. and G. Thompson. 2002. “Corporate Governance and Democracy: The Stakeholder Debate Revisited.” Journal of Management and Governance 6: 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dunfee, T.W. and T.L. Fort. 2003. “Corporate Hypergoals, Sustainable Peace, and the Adapted Firm.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 36: 563–617.Google Scholar
  13. Edwards, M. and S. Zadek. 2003. “Governing the Provision of Global Goods: The Role and Legitimacy of Nonstate Actors.” In I. Kaul, P. Conceição, K.L. Goulven, and R.U. Mendoza, R.U. (eds.), Providing Global Public Goods. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 200–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elster, J. 1986. “The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory.” In Elster, J. and A. Hylland (eds.), Foundations of Social Choice Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press: 103–132.Google Scholar
  15. Fort, T.L. and C.A. Schipani. 2002. “The Role of the Corporation in Fostering Sustainable Peace.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 35: 389–439.Google Scholar
  16. Freeman, R.E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. New York.Google Scholar
  17. Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Friedman, M. 1970. “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits.” New York Times Magazin. September 13, 1970; reprint in Donaldson, T., P.H. Werhane (eds.), Ethical Issues in Business. A Philosophical Approach. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall: 217–223.Google Scholar
  19. Frenkel, S.J. and D. Scott. 2002. “Compliance, Collaboration, and Codes of Labor Practice: The Adidas Connection.” California Management Review 45(1): 29–49.Google Scholar
  20. Fung, A. 2003. “Deliberative Democracy and International Labor Standards.” Governance 16: 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ghemawat, P. 2003. “The Forgotten Strategy.” Harvard Business Review 81 (November): 76–84.Google Scholar
  22. Giddens, A. 1990. Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  23. Goodpaster, K. 1998. “Business Ethics.” In Cooper, G.L. and C. Argyris (eds.), The Concise Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Management. Oxford, UK: Blackwell: 56–60.Google Scholar
  24. Habermas, J. 1996. Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Habermas, J. 1998. “Three Normative Models of Democracy.” In Habermas, J. The Inclusion of the Other. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press: 239–252.Google Scholar
  26. Habermas, J. 2001. “The Postnational Constellation and the Future of Democracy.” In Habermas, J. The Postnational Constellation. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press: 58–112.Google Scholar
  27. Henderson, P.D. 2001. Misguided Virtue. False Notions of Corporate Social Responsibility. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  28. Hollender, J. and S. Fenichell. 2004. What Matters Most. Basic Books.Google Scholar
  29. Hollenhorst, T. and Johnson, C. 2005. Tools for corporate social responsibility: Forest Stewardship Council. Atlanta, GA: ifPeople,, accessed May 5, 2005.Google Scholar
  30. Irwin, D.A. 2002. Free Trade under Fire. Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Jensen, M.C. 2002. “Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function.” Business Ethics Quarterly 12: 235–256.Google Scholar
  32. Jones, T.M. 1995. “Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics.” Academy of Management Review 20: 404–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. King, A.A. and M. Lenox. 2000. “Industry Self-regulation Without Sanction: The Chemical Industry’s Responsible Care Program.” Academy of Management Journal 43: 698–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kinley, D. and J. Tadaki. 2004. “From Talk to Walk: The Emergence of Human Rights Responsibilities for Corporations at International Law.” Virginia Journal of International Law 44: 931–1022.Google Scholar
  35. Krauss, M. 1997. How Nations Grow Rich. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Lal, D. 1998. “Social Standards and Social Dumping.” In: Giersch, H. (ed.), Merits and Limits of Markets. Heidelberg: Springer 1998: 255–274.Google Scholar
  37. Lal, D. 2003. “Private Morality and Capitalism: Learning from the Past.” In: Dunning, J. (ed.), Making Globalization Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lantos, G.P. 1999. “Motivating Moral Corporate Behavior.” Journal of Consumer Marketing 16(3): 222–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Leisinger, K.M. 2003. “Opportunities and Risks of the United Nations Global Compact.” The Journal of Corporate Citizenship 11: 113–131.Google Scholar
  40. Marciano, A. and J.-M. Josselin (Eds.) 2003. From Economic to Legal Competition. Cheltenham, UK: Edgar Elgar.Google Scholar
  41. Margolis, J.D. and J.P. Walsh. 2003. “Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiations by Business.” Administrative Science Quarterly 48: 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Marshall, T.H. 1965. Class, Citizenship and Social Development. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  43. Martinez-Mont, L. 1996. “Sweatshops are Better Than no Shops,” Wall Street Journal, June 25, 1996Google Scholar
  44. Matten, D. and A. Crane. 2005. “Corporate Citizenship: Toward an Extended Theoretical Conceptualization.” Academy of Management Review 30: 166–179.Google Scholar
  45. Matten, D. and W. Chapple. 2003. “Behind the Mask: Revealing the True Face of Corporate Citizenship.” Journal of Business Ethics 45: 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McWilliams, A. and D. Siegel. 2001. “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective.” Academy of Management Review 26: 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moon, J., A. Crane, and D. Matten. 2005. “Can Corporations be Citizens? Corporate Citizenship as a Metaphor for Business Participation in Society.” Business Ethics Quarterly 15: 429–454.Google Scholar
  48. Norberg, J. 2003. In Defence of Global Capitalism. Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute.Google Scholar
  49. Orts, E.W. 1995. “The Legitimacy of Multinational Corporations.” In Mitchell, L.E. (ed.), Progressive Corporate Law. Boulder, Col.: Westview Press: 247–279.Google Scholar
  50. Parker, C. 2002. The Open Corporation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Parker, C. and J. Braithwaite. 2003. “Regulation.” In Cane, P., and M. Tushnet (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Legal Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 119–145.Google Scholar
  52. Phillips, R. 2003. Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  53. Porter, M.E. and M.R. Kramer. 2002. “The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy.” Harvard Business Review 80 (December): 57–68.Google Scholar
  54. Reich, R.B. 1998. “The New Meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility.” California Management Review 40(Winter): 8–17.Google Scholar
  55. Reinicke, W.H. and F. Deng, with J.M. Witte, T. Benner, B. Whitaker, and J. Gershman. 2000. Critical Choices. Ottawa: Int. Development Research Center.Google Scholar
  56. Reinicke, W.H. and J.M. Witte. 2000. “Interdependence, Globalization, and Sovereignty: The Role of Non-binding International Legal Accords.” In Shelton, D. (ed.), Commitment and Compliance. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 75–100.Google Scholar
  57. Risse, T. 2002. “Transnational Actors and World Politics.” In von Carlsnaes, W., T. Risse, and B. Simmons (eds.), Handbook of International Relations. London: Sage: 255–274.Google Scholar
  58. Rondinelli, D.A. 2002. “Transnational Corporation. International Citizens or New Souvereigns?” Business and Society Review 107: 391–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rugman, A. 2000. The End of Globalization. London: Random House.Google Scholar
  60. Scherer, A.G. and M. Smid. 2000. “The Downward Spiral and the U.S. Model Business Principles. Why MNEs Should Take Responsibility for the Improvement of World-wide Social and Environmental Conditions.” Management International Review 40: 351–371.Google Scholar
  61. Sethi, P.S. 2002. “Standards for Corporate Conduct in the International Arena: Challenges and Opportunities for Multinational Corporations.” Business and Society Review 107(1): 20–40.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  62. Sethi, P.S. 2003. Setting Global Standards. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  63. Shell, G.R. 2004. Make the Rules or your Rivals Will. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
  64. Shelton, D. 2000. “Law, Non-Law and the Problem of „Soft Law“.” In Shelton, D. (ed.), Commitment and Compliance. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1–18.Google Scholar
  65. Siedel, G.J. 2002. Using the Law for Competitive Advantage. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  66. Smith, J. 2002. “Briding Global Divides? Strategic Framing and Solidarity in Transnatioanl Social Movement Organizations.” International Sociology, 17:505–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Steinmann, H. and A. Löhr. 1996. “A Republican Concept of Corporate Ethics.” In Urban, S. (ed.), Europe’s Challenges. Wiesbaden: Gabler: 21–60.Google Scholar
  68. Steinmann, H. and A.G. Scherer. 1998. “Corporate Ethics and Global Business. Philosophical Considerations on Intercultural Management.” In Kumar, B.N. and H. Steinmann (eds.), Ethics in International Business. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter: 13–46.Google Scholar
  69. Steinmann, H. 2000. “Corporate Ethics and Management Theory.” In Koslowski, P. (Ed.): Contemporary Economic Ethics and Business Ethics. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer: 148–192.Google Scholar
  70. Sundaram, A.K. and A.C. Inkpen. 2004. “The Corporate Objective Revisited.” Organization Science 15: 350–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Teegen, H., J.P. Doh, and S. Vachani. 2004. “The Importance of Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs) in Global Governance and Value Creation: An International Business Research.” Journal of International Business Studies, 35: 463–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Trevino, L.K. and G.R. Weaver. 1994. “Business ETHICS/BUSINESS Ethics: One Field or Two?” Business Ethics Quarterly 4(2): 113–128.Google Scholar
  73. Ulrich, P. 2000. “Integrative Economic Ethics — Towards a Conception of Socio-Economic Rationality.” In P. Koslowski. (ed.), Contemporary Economic Ethics and Business Ethics. Berlin: Springer: 37–54.Google Scholar
  74. Ulrich, P. 2002. “Ethics and Economics.” In L. Zsolnai (ed.), Ethics in the Economy. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  75. Walsh, J.P. 2005. “Book Review Essay: Taking Stock of Stakeholder Management.” Academy of Management Review 30: 426–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Walsh, J.P., K. Weber, and J.D. Margolis. 2003. “Social Issues and Management: Our Lost Cause Found.” Journal of Management 29: 859–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Whetten, D.A., G. Rands, and P.O. Godfrey. 2002. “What are the Responsibilities of Business to Society?” In: Pettigrew, A., H. Thomas, and R. Whittington (eds.), Handbook of Strategy and Management. London: Sage: 373–408.Google Scholar
  78. Williams, O.F. 2000. Global Codes of Conduct. An Idea Whose Time Has Come. Notre Dame: Notre Dame Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  79. Windsor, D. 2004. “The Development of International Business Norms.” Business Ethics Quarterly 14: 729–754.Google Scholar
  80. Young, I.M. 2004. “Responsibility and Global Labor Justice.” Journal of Political Philosophy 12: 365–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zadek, S. 2004. “The Path to Corporate Responsibility.” Harvard Business Review 82 (December): 125–132.Google Scholar
  82. Zürn, M. 2002. “From Interdependence to Globalization.” In von Carlsnaes, W., T. Risse, and B. Simmons (eds.), Handbook of International Relations. London: Sage: 235–254.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas G. Scherer
    • 1
  • Guido Palazzo
    • 2
  • Dorothée Baumann
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Organization and Administrative Science (IOU)Switzerland
  2. 2.University of LausanneSwitzerland
  3. 3.University of ZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations