Skip to main content

GRW Theory (Ghirardi, Rimini, Weber Model of Quantum Mechanics)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Compendium of Quantum Physics

Consider a toy system consisting of a marble and box. The marble has two states, |Ψin⟩ and | Ψout⟩, corresponding to the marble being inside or outside the box. These states are eigenvectors of the operator B̂, measuring whether the marble is inside or outside the box. The formalism of quantum mechanics (QM) has it that not only |Ψin⟩ and | Ψout⟩ themselves, but any ► superposition |Ψm⟩ = ain + bout⟩ where a and b are complex numbers such that |a|2 + |b|2 = 1, can be the state of the marble. What are the properties of the marble in such a state? This question is commonly answered by appeal to the so-called Eigenstate-Eigenvalue Rule (EER): An observable Ô has a well-defined value for a quantum a system S in state |Ψ⟩ if, and only if, |Ψ⟩ is an eigenstate of Ô. Since |Ψin⟩ and |Ψout⟩ are eigen-states of B̂, EER yields that the marble is either inside (or outside) the box if its state is |Ψin⟩ (or |Ψout⟩). However, states like |Ψm⟩ defy interpretation on the basis of EER and we have to conclude that if the marble is in such a state then it is neither inside nor outside the box. This is unacceptable because we know from experience that marbles are always either inside or outside boxes. Reconciling this fact of everyday experience with the quantum formalism is the infamous measurement problem. See also ► Bohmian mechanics; Measurement theory; Metaphysics in Quantum Mechanics; Modal Interpretation; Objectification; Projection Postulate.

Standard quantum mechanics solves this problem, following a suggestion of von Neumann's, by postulating that upon measurement the system's state is instantaneously reduced to one of the eigenstates of the measured observable, which leaves the system in a state that can be interpreted on the basis of EER (► Measurement Theory). However, it is generally accepted that this proposal is ultimately unacceptable. What defines a measurement? At what stage of the measurement process does the ► wave function collapse take place (trigger problem)? And why should the properties of a system depend on actions of observers?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  1. G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini, T. Weber: Unified Dynamics for Microscopic and Macroscopic Systems. Physical Review 34D, 470–91 (1986)

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. G. C. Ghirardi, P. Pearle, A. Rimini: Markov Processes in Hilbert Space and Spontaneous Localization of Systems of Identical Particles. Physical Review 42A, 78–89 (1990)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Pearle: Combining Stochastic Dynamical State-Vector Reduction with Spontaneous Localization. Physical Review 39A, 2277–2289 (1989)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. D. Z. Albert, B. Loewer: Tails of Schrödinger's Cat. In Perspectives on Quantum Reality: Non-Relativistic, Relativistic, and Field-Theoretic, ed. by R. Clifton (Kluwer, Dordrecht 1995, 81–92)

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Bassi, G. C. Ghirardi: Dynamical Reduction Models. Physics Reports 379, 257–426 (2003)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. J. S. Bell: Are There Quantum Jumps? In Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics, ed. J. S. Bell (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1987, 201–212)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Clifton, B. Monton: Losing Your Marbles in Wavefunction Collapse Theories. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50, 697–717 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Frigg: On the Property Structure of Realist Collapse Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics and the So-Called ‘Counting Anomaly’. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17, 43–57 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Frigg, C. Hoefer: Probability in GRW Theory. Forthcoming in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 38 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. C. Ghirardi: Collapse Theories. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2002 Edition), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2002/contents.html

  11. G. C. Ghirardi, R. Grassi, F. Benatti: Describing the Macroscopic World: Closing the Circle Within the Dynamic Reduction Program. Foundations of Physics 25, 5–38 (1995)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. P. J. Lewis: Quantum Mechanics, Orthogonality, and Counting. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48, 313–328 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. P. J. Lewis: Interpreting Spontaneous Collapse Theories. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36, 165–180 (2005)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. B. Monton: The Problem of Ontology for Spontaneous Collapse Theories. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35, 407–421 (2004)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Rimini: Spontaneous Localization and Superconductivity. In Advances in quantumPhenom-ena, ed. by E. Beltrametti et al. (Plenum, New York 1995, 321–333)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Frigg, R. (2009). GRW Theory (Ghirardi, Rimini, Weber Model of Quantum Mechanics). In: Greenberger, D., Hentschel, K., Weinert, F. (eds) Compendium of Quantum Physics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70626-7_81

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70626-7_81

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70622-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70626-7

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics