Consider a toy system consisting of a marble and box. The marble has two states, |Ψin⟩ and | Ψout⟩, corresponding to the marble being inside or outside the box. These states are eigenvectors of the operator B̂, measuring whether the marble is inside or outside the box. The formalism of quantum mechanics (QM) has it that not only |Ψin⟩ and | Ψout⟩ themselves, but any ► superposition |Ψm⟩ = a |Ψin + b |Ψout⟩ where a and b are complex numbers such that |a|2 + |b|2 = 1, can be the state of the marble. What are the properties of the marble in such a state? This question is commonly answered by appeal to the so-called Eigenstate-Eigenvalue Rule (EER): An observable Ô has a well-defined value for a quantum a system S in state |Ψ⟩ if, and only if, |Ψ⟩ is an eigenstate of Ô. Since |Ψin⟩ and |Ψout⟩ are eigen-states of B̂, EER yields that the marble is either inside (or outside) the box if its state is |Ψin⟩ (or |Ψout⟩). However, states like |Ψm⟩ defy interpretation on the basis of EER and we have to conclude that if the marble is in such a state then it is neither inside nor outside the box. This is unacceptable because we know from experience that marbles are always either inside or outside boxes. Reconciling this fact of everyday experience with the quantum formalism is the infamous measurement problem. See also ► Bohmian mechanics; Measurement theory; Metaphysics in Quantum Mechanics; Modal Interpretation; Objectification; Projection Postulate.
Standard quantum mechanics solves this problem, following a suggestion of von Neumann's, by postulating that upon measurement the system's state is instantaneously reduced to one of the eigenstates of the measured observable, which leaves the system in a state that can be interpreted on the basis of EER (► Measurement Theory). However, it is generally accepted that this proposal is ultimately unacceptable. What defines a measurement? At what stage of the measurement process does the ► wave function collapse take place (trigger problem)? And why should the properties of a system depend on actions of observers?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature
G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini, T. Weber: Unified Dynamics for Microscopic and Macroscopic Systems. Physical Review 34D, 470–91 (1986)
G. C. Ghirardi, P. Pearle, A. Rimini: Markov Processes in Hilbert Space and Spontaneous Localization of Systems of Identical Particles. Physical Review 42A, 78–89 (1990)
P. Pearle: Combining Stochastic Dynamical State-Vector Reduction with Spontaneous Localization. Physical Review 39A, 2277–2289 (1989)
D. Z. Albert, B. Loewer: Tails of Schrödinger's Cat. In Perspectives on Quantum Reality: Non-Relativistic, Relativistic, and Field-Theoretic, ed. by R. Clifton (Kluwer, Dordrecht 1995, 81–92)
A. Bassi, G. C. Ghirardi: Dynamical Reduction Models. Physics Reports 379, 257–426 (2003)
J. S. Bell: Are There Quantum Jumps? In Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics, ed. J. S. Bell (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1987, 201–212)
R. Clifton, B. Monton: Losing Your Marbles in Wavefunction Collapse Theories. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50, 697–717 (1999)
R. Frigg: On the Property Structure of Realist Collapse Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics and the So-Called ‘Counting Anomaly’. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17, 43–57 (2003)
R. Frigg, C. Hoefer: Probability in GRW Theory. Forthcoming in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 38 (2007)
G. C. Ghirardi: Collapse Theories. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2002 Edition), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2002/contents.html
G. C. Ghirardi, R. Grassi, F. Benatti: Describing the Macroscopic World: Closing the Circle Within the Dynamic Reduction Program. Foundations of Physics 25, 5–38 (1995)
P. J. Lewis: Quantum Mechanics, Orthogonality, and Counting. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48, 313–328 (1997)
P. J. Lewis: Interpreting Spontaneous Collapse Theories. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36, 165–180 (2005)
B. Monton: The Problem of Ontology for Spontaneous Collapse Theories. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35, 407–421 (2004)
A. Rimini: Spontaneous Localization and Superconductivity. In Advances in quantumPhenom-ena, ed. by E. Beltrametti et al. (Plenum, New York 1995, 321–333)
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Frigg, R. (2009). GRW Theory (Ghirardi, Rimini, Weber Model of Quantum Mechanics). In: Greenberger, D., Hentschel, K., Weinert, F. (eds) Compendium of Quantum Physics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70626-7_81
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70626-7_81
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70622-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70626-7
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)