Advertisement

Jacob Lorhard’s Ontology: A 17th Century Hypertext on the Reality and Temporality of the World of Intelligibles

  • Peter Øhrstrøm
  • Henrik Schärfe
  • Sara L. Uckelman
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5113)

Abstract

Jacob Lorhard published his ontology in 1606. In this work the term ontologia ‘ontology’ was used for the first time ever. In this paper, it is argued that Lorhard’s ontology provides a useful key to the understanding of the early 17th-century world view in Protestant Europe. Among other things, Lorhard’s ontology reflects how the relations between scientific investigation and religious belief were seen. It is also argued that several of the conceptual choices which Lorhard made in order to establish his ontology may still be relevant for modern makers of ontological systems. In particular, Lorhard’s considerations on the notions of reality and time deserve modern reflections. Also his assumption of the educational value of diagrammatical ontology deserves a modern discussion. Along with this paper an online hypertext version of Lorhard’s ontology has been presented in order to create a useful tool for historical research in early 17th-century thought and in order to illustrate the problems, which characterized the early attempt at establishing a diagrammatical approach to ontology.

Note: References with just a page number (e.g. [p.17]) refer to the English translation of Lorhard’s Ontology [7].

Keywords

Human Cognition External World Human Mind Moral Quality Human Rationality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aristotle, Physics. Translated by Hardie, R.P., Gaye, R.K., http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/physics.2.ii.html
  2. 2.
    Guarino, N., Welty, C.: Ontological Analysis of Taxonomic Relationships. In: Laender, A.H.F., Liddle, S.W., Storey, V.C. (eds.) ER 2000. LNCS, vol. 1920, pp. 210–224. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lamanna, M.: Correspondences between the works of Lorhard and Timpler, Bari University (2006), http://www.formalontology.it/essays/correspondences_timpler-lorhard.pdf
  4. 4.
    Lohr, C.H.: Metaphysics. In: Skinner, Q., Kessler, E. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Needham, J.: The Grand Titration. Science and Society in East and West (1970) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Timpler, C.: Metaphysicae Systema Methodicum. 1604, SteinfurtGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Uckelman, S.L.: Diagraph of Metaphysics or Ontology - Jacob Lorhard, 1606 (2008), http://staff.science.uva.nl/~suckelma/lorhard/lorhard-english.html
  8. 8.
    Øhrstrøm, P., Andersen, J., Schärfe, H.: What has Happened to Ontology. In: Dau, F., Mugnier, M.-L., Stumme, G. (eds.) ICCS 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3596, pp. 425–438. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Øhrstrøm, P., Uckelman, S.L., Schärfe, H.: Historical and Conceptual Foundation of Diagrammatical Ontology. In: Priss, U., Polovina, S., Hill, R. (eds.) ICCS 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4604, pp. 374–386. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Øhrstrøm
    • 1
  • Henrik Schärfe
    • 1
  • Sara L. Uckelman
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Communication and PsychologyAalborg University 
  2. 2.Institute for Logic, Language, and ComputationUniversiteit van Amsterdam 

Personalised recommendations