Abstract
A wide variety of digital mammography systems are available for breast cancer imaging, each varying in physical performance. However, the relationship between physical performance assessment and clinical outcome is not clear. Thus, a means of simulating technically and clinically realistic images from different systems would represent a first step towards elucidating the impact of physical performance on clinical outcome. To this end, a framework for simulating technically realistic images has been developed. A range of simulated test objects, including CDMAM have been used to determine whether the simulation chain correctly reproduces these objects thus validating the simulation framework. Results evaluated for two digital mammography systems have been promising, with simulated images proving similar to experimental images for Modulation Transfer Function and Normalised Noise Power Spectrum measurements differing by approximately 3%.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Young, K.C., Cook, J.J.H., Oduko, J.M.: Automated and human determination of threshold contrast for digital mammography systems. In: Astley, S.M., Brady, M., Rose, C., Zwiggelaar, R. (eds.) IWDM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4046, pp. 266–272. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Visser, M., Karssemeijer, N.: Manual CDCOM version 1.5: software for automated readout of CDMAM 3.4 images, http://www.euref.org
Young, K.C., Cook, J.J.H., Oduko, J.M., Bosmans, H.: Comparison of software and human observers in reading images of the CDMAM test object to assess digital mammography systems. In: Flynn, M.J., Hsieh, J. (eds.) Medical Imaging 2006: Physics of Medical Imaging, vol. 6142. SPIE, San Diego (2006)
Young, K.C., Alsager, A., Oduko, J.M., Bosmans, H., Verbrugge, B., Geertse, T., van Engen, R.: Evaluation of software for reading images of the CDMAM test object to assess digital mammography systems. In: Hsieh, J., Samei, E. (eds.) Medical Imaging 2008: Physics of Medical Imaging, vol. 6913. SPIE (2008)
Saunders, R.S., Samei, E.: A method for modifying the image quality parameters of digital radiographic images. Medical Physics 30(11), 3006–3017 (2003)
Sandborg, M., Dance, D.R., Alm Carlsson, G.: Calculation of contrast and signal-to-noise degradation factors for digital detectors in chest and breast imaging. Department of Radiation Physics, Linkoping University (2003) ISSN 1102-1799
Marshall, N.W.: A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system. Phys. Med. Biol. 51, 2441–2463 (2006)
Carton, A.-K., Vandenbroucke, D., Struye, L., Maidment, A.D.A., Kao, Y.-H., Albert, M., Bosmans, H., Marchal, G.: Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control. Medical Physics 32(6), 1684–1695 (2005)
Karssemeijer, N., Thijssen, M.A.O.: Determination of contrast detail curves of mammography systems by automated image analysis. In: Doi, K., Giger, M.L., Nishikawa, R.M., Schmidt, R.A. (eds.) IWDM 1996, pp. 155–160. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1996)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yip, M., Alsager, A., Lewis, E., Wells, K., Young, K.C. (2008). Validation of a Digital Mammography Image Simulation Chain with Automated Scoring of CDMAM Images. In: Krupinski, E.A. (eds) Digital Mammography. IWDM 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5116. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3_57
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3_57
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70537-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70538-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)