Skip to main content

Prompting in Mammography: Reproducibility

  • Conference paper
Digital Mammography (IWDM 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 5116))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1288 Accesses

Abstract

Computer-aided detection (CAD) systems are improving their performance both in terms of sensitivity and specificity, but false prompts remain an area of interest because of their potential to distract from prompts marking real abnormalities and to reduce the importance attached to any given prompt by a film reader. Many false prompts are very near to the threshold for prompting: in this study we investigate reproducibility of prompting by a commercial CAD system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. National Health Service Breast Screening Programme Annual Review (2007), http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/breastscreen/publications/nhsbsp-annualreview2007-lower-resolution.pdf

  2. Taylor, P., Champness, J., Reddy, M., et al.: Reproducibility of Prompts in Computer Aided Detection of Breast Cancer. Clin. Radiol. 58, 733–738 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Malich, A., Azhari, T., Bohm, T., et al.: Reproducibility – an important factor determining the quality of computer-aided detection (CAD) systems. Eur. J. Radiol. 36, 170–174 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zheng, B., Maitz, G.S., Ganott, M.A., Abrams, G., Leader, J.K., Gur, D.: Performance and Reproducibility of a Computerized Mass Detection Scheme for digitized Mammography Using Rotated and Resampled Images: An Assessment. Am. J. Roentgenol. 185(1), 194–198 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zheng, B., Hardesty, L.A., Poller, W.R., Sumkin, J.H., Golla, S.: Mammography with Computer-aided Detection: Reproducibility Assessment—Initial Experience. Radiology 228, 58–62 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Seung Ja Kim, M.D., Woo Kyung Moon, M.D., Nariya Cho, M.D., Joo Hee Cha, M.D., Sun Mi Kim, M.D., Jung-Gi Im, M.D.: Computer-aided Detection in Full-Field Digital Mammography: Sensitivity and Reproducibility in Serial Examinations. Radiology 246, 71–80 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Elizabeth A. Krupinski

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tiew, S., Astley, S., Dillon, B., Morris, J., Boggis, C. (2008). Prompting in Mammography: Reproducibility. In: Krupinski, E.A. (eds) Digital Mammography. IWDM 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5116. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70537-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70538-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics