Praise, Blame, Obligation, and Beyond: Toward a Framework for Classical Supererogation and Kin
- Cite this paper as:
- McNamara P. (2008) Praise, Blame, Obligation, and Beyond: Toward a Framework for Classical Supererogation and Kin. In: van der Meyden R., van der Torre L. (eds) Deontic Logic in Computer Science. DEON 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5076. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Continuing prior work ([1, 2]), I integrate a simple system for personal obligation with a system for aretaic (agent-evaluative) appraisal. I then explore various relationships between definable aretaic statuses such as praiseworthiness and blameworthiness and deontic statuses such as obligatoriness and impermissibility. I focus on partitions of the normative statuses generated (cf. "normative positions" but without explicit representation of agency). In addition to representing and exploring traditional questions in ethical theory about the connection between blame, praise, permissibility and obligation, this allows me to carefully represent schemes for supererogation and kin. These controversial concepts have provided challenges to both ethical theory and deontic logic, and are among deontic logic’s test cases.
KeywordsSupererogation Offense Praise Blame Obligation Aretaic Deontic Neutral Indifferent
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.