A Deontic Logic for Socially Optimal Norms

  • Jan Broersen
  • Rosja Mastop
  • John-Jules Ch. Meyer
  • Paolo Turrini
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5076)


The paper discusses the interaction properties between preference and choice of coalitions in a strategic interaction. A language is presented to talk about the conflict between coalitionally optimal and socially optimal choices. Norms are seen as social constructions that enable to enforce socially desirable outcomes.


Multi Agent System Grand Coalition Strategic Interaction Optimal Norm Social Choice Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Arrow, K.: Social Choice and Individual Values. Yale University Press (1970)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borgo, S.: Coalitions in action logic. In: Proc. of IJCAI, pp. 1822–1827 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Broersen, J.: Modal action logics for reasoning about reactive systems. PhD-thesis Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coleman, J.: Foundations of Social Theory. Belknap Harvard (1990)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Horty, J.: Deontic Logic and Agency. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kooi, B., Tamminga, A.: Conflicting obligations in multi-agent deontic logic. In: Goble, L., Meyer, J.-J.C. (eds.) DEON 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4048, pp. 175–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mastop, R.: What can you do? imperative mood in semantic theory. PhD thesis, ILLC Dissertation Series (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Osborne, M., Rubinstein, A.: A course in Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Parikh, R.: Social software. Synthese 132(3), 187–211 (2002)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pauly, M.: Logic for Social Software. ILLC Dissertation Series (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    van Benthem, J.: Minimal deontic logics. Bulletin of the Section of Logic 8(1), 36–42 (1979)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    van Benthem, J., Liu, F.: Dynamic logic of preference upgrade. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 14 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    von Wright, G.: The logic of preference. Edimburgh University Press (1963)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wright, G.V.: Deontic logic and the theory of conditions. In: Hilpinen, R. (ed.) Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings, pp. 3–31 (1971)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Broersen
    • 1
  • Rosja Mastop
    • 1
  • John-Jules Ch. Meyer
    • 1
  • Paolo Turrini
    • 1
  1. 1.Universiteit Utrecht 

Personalised recommendations