Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Operations Research Proceedings 2006 pp 417–422Cite as

MCDA in Analyzing the Recycling Strategies in Malaysia

  • Conference paper

Part of the Operations Research Proceedings book series (ORP,volume 2006)

Abstract

The outranking analysis has been frequently used to deal with the complex decisions involving qualitative criteria and imprecise data (see [5]).

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brans, J.P., Vincke, Ph., 1985, A preference ranking organization method: The PROMETHEE method, Management Science, 31, 647–656.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  2. Chenayah, S., Takeda, E., 2006, A generalized Procedure in PROMETHEE Analysis, with an application to the evaluation of Recycling Strategies in Malaysia, Asia Pacific Management Review, 11(1), 85–96.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fodor, J., Roubens, M., 1994, Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support, Kliwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Macharis, C., Springael, J., Brucker, K., and Verbeke, A., 2004. PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis. Strengthening PROMENTHEE with ideas of AHP, European Journal of Operational Research, 153, 307–317.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Roy, B., 1996, Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Saaty, T.L., 1980, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Santha Chenayah

  2. Institute of Biological Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Agamuthu Periathamby

  3. Graduate School of Economics, Osaka University, Japan

    Eiji Takeda

Authors
  1. Santha Chenayah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Agamuthu Periathamby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eiji Takeda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Wirtschaftstheorie und Operations Research, Universität Karlsruhe (TH), Kaiserstraße 12, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany

    Karl-Heinz Waldmann  & Ulrike M. Stocker  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chenayah, S., Periathamby, A., Takeda, E. (2007). MCDA in Analyzing the Recycling Strategies in Malaysia. In: Waldmann, KH., Stocker, U.M. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 2006. Operations Research Proceedings, vol 2006. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69995-8_67

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

search

Navigation