Abstract
Localization investments are made mainly to increase the domestic content of manufacturing, thereby to reduce the costs and import dependency. Since localization investments include technology transfer, they positively affect the developing economies. The arrival of the new technology to the country has a positive impact on development of the equipment, workforce and the final product. It is often applied in automotive industry. Through localization investments not only improvement of OEMs, but also development of involved subsidiary industry can be induced. As a developing economy itself, Turkey encourages these kinds of investments and gives governmental incentives. The problem here is the valuation of these investment projects accurately by including all strategic impacts. Just because localization projects involve many future growth opportunities, conventional valuation tools cannot value those embedded opportunities correctly and the value of the project mostly appears negative or very low. This situation can cause a misjudgment at the incentives stage. This paper analyzes the localization project, first with conventional NPV analysis, then with real options analysis and finally compares the results. As for the options analysis, the results of potential involvement of various option types such as sequential options approach are used in the valuation of a case from Turkish automotive industry.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amran Martha, Kulatilaka Nalin (1999) Real Options: Managing Strategic Investment In an Uncertain World. Harvard Business School Press.
Devlet Planlama Tepkilati, Dokuzuncu Kalkinma Plani (2007–2013) Otomotiv Sanayii özel Ihtisas Komisyonu Raporu.
Ford David N., Sobek Durward K. (2005) Adapting Real Options to New Product Development by Modeling the Second Toyota Paradox. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 52: 175–185.
Howell Sydney (2001) Real Options: Evaluating Corporate Investment In a Dynamic World. Financial Times Prentice Hall, GB.
http://vizyon2023.tubitak.gov.tr/teknolojiongorusu/paneller/makinevemalzeme/raporlar/Ek6a.pdf
Mun Jonathan (2002) Real Options Analysis: Tools and Techniques For Valuing Strategic Investments and Decisions. John Wiley & Sons.
Shtub Avraham, Bard Jonathan F., Globerson Shlomo (1994) Project Management Engineering, Technology and Implementation. Prentice Hall.
Trigeorgis Lenos (1995) Real Options In Capital Investment:Models, Strategies, and Applications. Praeger.
Trigeorgis Lenos (1996) Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy In Resource Allocation. MIT Press.
UNIDO Industrial Development Report (2005) Vienna.
Automotive Manufacturers Association, www.osd.org.tr.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Emel, G.G., özkeserli, P. (2007). The Valuation of Localization Investments with Real Options: A Case from Turkish Automotive Industry. In: Waldmann, KH., Stocker, U.M. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 2006. Operations Research Proceedings, vol 2006. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69995-8_51
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69995-8_51
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69994-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69995-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)
