Abstract
In late June 2004, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision approved and published a document entitled “International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: A revised Framework”, better known as the “Basel II framework”. The publication of this document marked the final milestone of a process that was over five years in the making. The fundamental improvements over the Basel I Accord of 1988 help explain this relatively long time span. The main objectives of the new framework, stated by the Basel Committee in its June 1999 Consultative Paper, were the following:
-
To promote safety and soundness in the financial system.
-
To enhance competitive equality.
-
To adopt a more comprehensive approach to addressing risks.
-
To continue to focus on internationally active banks, although the new framework’s principles should also be applicable to banks of varying levels of complexity and sophistication.
Whereas the first two goals pick up where the Basel I Accord left off, the last two represent important advancements. The desire to develop a more comprehensive approach was a direct consequence of recognizing that the current regime lacks risk sensitivity in its minimum capital requirements and encourages market participants to exploit mechanisms of regulatory capital arbitrage.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
The views expressed herein are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Deutsche Bundesbank.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. The New Basel Capital Accord, Consultative Document. http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbsca03.pdf, 2001.
K. Duellmann and N. Masschelein. Sector concentration in loan portfolios and economic capital. Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper, Series 2, No. 9, and NBB working paper, 2006.
J. C. Garcia Cespedes, J. A. de Juan Herrero, A. Kreinin, and D. Rosen. A simple multi-factor “factor adjustment” for the treatment of diversification in credit capital rules. Journal Credit Risk, 2(3):57–85, 2006.
M. Gordy. A comparative anatomy of credit risk models. Journal of Banking and Finance, 24:119–149, 2000.
M. Gordy and E. Luetkebohmert. Granularity adjustment for Basel II. Unpublished Working Paper, 2006.
G.M. Gupton, C.C. Finger, and M. Bhatia. CreditMetrics — Technical Document. New York: Morgan Guaranty Trust Co., 1997.
M. Pykhtin. Multi-factor adjustment. Risk Magazine, 17(3):85–90, 2004.
P. Tornqvist and B. de Longevialle. Research: Concentration risks remain high at european banks. Standard&Poor’s Ratings Direct 22-Oct-2004, 2004.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Duellmann, K. (2007). Basel II — Achievements and Challenges. In: Waldmann, KH., Stocker, U.M. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 2006. Operations Research Proceedings, vol 2006. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69995-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69995-8_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69994-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69995-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)
