Advertisement

Analysis of Learning Objectives in Object Oriented Programming

  • Peter Hubwieser
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5090)

Abstract

The paper presents an analysis of the learning objectives that have to be achieved in order to learn Object Oriented Programming. By using the prerequisite relation between these objectives we develop a sequence of concepts for a textbook. The article is closed by some considerations concerning the electronic management of learning objectives using ontologies.

Keywords

Learn Objective Metacognitive Knowledge Educational Objective Prerequisite Relation Instructional Objective 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R. (eds.): A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Duffy, T.M., Jonassen, D.H. (eds.): Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1992)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Frey, E., Hubwieser, P., Winhard, F.: Informatik 1. Objekte, Strukturen, Algorithmen. Klett, Stuttgart (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hubwieser, P.: Functions, Objects and States - Teaching Informatics in Secondary Schools (ISSEP 2006, Vilnius, Litauen). In: Mittermeir, R.T. (ed.) ISSEP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4226, pp. 104–116. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hubwieser, P., Schneider, M., Spohrer, M., Voß, S.: Informatik 2. Tabellenkalkulationssysteme, Datenbanken. Klett, Stuttgart (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hubwieser, P.: A smooth way towards object oriented programming in secondary schools. In: Benzie, D., Iding, M. (eds.) Informatics, Mathematics and ICT: a ’golden triangle’. IFIP WG 3.1 & 3.5 Working Conference CD proceedings, IFIP & College of Computer and Information Science Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts, USA (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hubwieser, P., Steinert, M., Spohrer, M., Voß, S.: Informatik 3. ALgorithmen, Objektorientierte Programmierung, Zustandsmodellierung. Klett, Stuttgart (to appear, 2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Staller, A.: Merging domain knowledge and task analysis in an ontology. In: Méndez-Vilas, A., Solano Martín, A., Mesa González, J.A., Mesa González, J. (eds.) Current Developments in Technology-Assisted Education, Badajoz, Spain. Technological Science Education, Collaborative Learning, Knowledge Management. FORMATEX, vol. II, pp. 1585–1589 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Steinert, M.: Functional modelling and the graph of learning objectives. In: Benzie, D., Iding, M. (eds.) Informatics, Mathematics and ICT: a ’golden triangle’. IFIP WG 3.1 & 3.5 Working Conference CD proceedings, IFIP  & College of Computer and Information Science Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts, USA (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Hubwieser
    • 1
  1. 1.Fakultät für InformatikTechnische Universität MünchenGarching 

Personalised recommendations