ARGarden: Augmented Edutainment System with a Learning Companion

  • Sejin Oh
  • Woontack Woo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5080)


Recently, many researchers have studied on agent-based edutainment systems to improve students’ learning experiences. In this paper, we present ARGarden which makes users experience an interactive flower gardening with a learning companion squatting on an augmented picture. The companion perceives users’ actions as well as situations in the learning environment and appraises the perceived information autonomously. Then, it presents peer support to help participants’ problem-solving through anthropomorphic expressions. We developed our system on a mobile device and visualized a learning companion as an animated bluebird. We also demonstrated the implemented system at an exhibition and evaluated the effectiveness of our system through the observation of participants’ responses to the demonstration. In this evaluation, we found that the bluebird as a learning companion helped users to experience how to properly grow the flower in our edutainment setting. Finally, we expect possibilities that an augmented learning companion is one of the key factors for developing effective edutainment applications.


Augmented Reality Fiducial Marker Pedagogical Agent Interactive Learning Environment Augmented Flower 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Lester, J., Stone, B., Stelling, G.D.: Lifelike pedagogical agents for mixed-initiative problem solving in constructivist learning environments. User modeling and user adapted interaction 9(1), 1–44 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnson, W., Rickel, J., Lester, J.: Animated pedagogical agents: face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 11, 47–78 (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gulz, A., Haake, M.: Design of animated pedagogical agents—A look at their look. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64(4), 322–339 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sklar, E., Richards, D.: The Use of Agents in Human Learning Systems. In: International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 767–774 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lester, J., Converse, S., Kahler, S., Barlow, T., Stone, B., Bhoga, R.: The Persona Effect: Affective Impact of Animated Pedagogical Agents. In: Conference on human factors in computing systems, pp. 359–366 (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., MacIntyre, B.: Recent Advances in Augmented Reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 21(6), 34–47 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Billinghurst, M., Kato, H., Poupyrev, I.: The MagicBook: a transitional AR interface. Computers and Graphics 25(5), 745–753 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    MacIntyre, B., Bolter, J.D., Moreno, E., Hannigan, B.: Augmented Reality as a New Media Experience. In: International Symposium on Augmented Reality (ISAR), pp. 197–206 (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Andreas, D., Eva, H.: An observational study of children interacting with an augmented story book. In: Hui, K.-c., Pan, Z., Chung, R.C.-k., Wang, C.C.L., Jin, X., Göbel, S., Li, E.C.-L. (eds.) EDUTAINMENT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4469, pp. 305–315. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anabuki, M., Kakuta, H., Yamamoto, H., Tamura, H.: Welbo: an embodied conversational agent living in mixed reality space. In: Conference on human factors in computing systems, pp. 10–11 (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barakonyi, I., Psik, T., Schmalstieg, D.: Agents That Talk And Hit Back: Animated Agents in Augmented Reality. In: IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, pp. 141–150 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wagner, D., Billinghurst, M., Schmalstieg, D.: How Real Should Virtual Characters Be? In: International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bratman, M.E.: Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Oh, S., Gratch, J., Woo, W.: Explanatory Style for Socially Interactive Agents. In: Paiva, A., Prada, R., Picard, R.W. (eds.) ACII 2007. LNCS, vol. 4738, pp. 534–545. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gratch, J., Marsella, S.: Technical details of a domain independent framework for modeling emotion from,
  16. 16.
    Gratch, J., Marsella, S.: A Domain-independent framework for modeling emotion. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research 5(4), 269–306 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
  18. 18.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sejin Oh
    • 1
  • Woontack Woo
    • 1
  1. 1.GIST U-VR Lab.GwangjuS.Korea

Personalised recommendations