Skip to main content

Improving Customer Support Processes: A Case Study

  • Conference paper
Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5089))

Abstract

IT organizations need systematic methods to manage the increasing number of service requests and software problems reported by customers. A large number of open problems can rapidly increase the costs of software maintenance and development. Therefore, an IT organization needs a well-defined customer support model. However, existing customer support models have one major shortcoming: a lack of process description that shows the interaction between different support processes (incident management, problem management and change management) and their activities. In this paper, we use a constructive research method to build an improved process model for customer support. Additionally, we present findings of a case study that focused on improving support processes in a medium-sized Finnish IT company. The research question in this paper is: What is the role of the problem management process in customer support?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Office of Government Commerce: ITIL Service Support. The Stationary Office, UK (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. COBIT 4.0: Control Objectives for Information and related Technology: COBIT 4.0. IT Governance Institute (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. IEEE Standard 1044-1993: IEEE Standard Classification for Software Anomalies. IEEE (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Florac, W.: Software quality measurement a framework for counting problems and defects. Technical Report CMU/SEI-92-TR-22 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Card, D.N.: Learning from our mistakes with defect causal analysis. IEEE Software 15(1), 56–63 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Office of Government Commerce: ITIL Service Delivery. The Stationary Office, UK (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Leszak, M., Perry, D.E., Stoll, D.: A case study in root cause defect analysis. In: ICSE 2000: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Software engineering, pp. 428–437. ACM Press, New York (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Kruchten, P.: The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Binder, R.: Testing Object-Oriented Systems: Models, Patterns, and Tools. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pink Elephant: Itil process maturity. Pink Elephant Whitepaper (2005), http://www.pinkelephant.com/en-US/ResourceCenter/PinkPapers/PinkPapersList.htm

  11. Jalote, P.: CMM in Practice, Processes for Executing Software Projects at Infosys. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Niessinka, F., Clerca, V., Tijdinka, T., van Vlietb, H.: The it service capability maturity model version 1.0. CIBIT Consultants&Vrije Universiteit (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. ISO/IEC: ISO/IEC 20000 A Pocket Guide. Van Haren Publishing (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. ISO/IEC 12207: Information Technology Software Life-Cycle Processes. ISO/IEC Copyright Office (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Microsoft: Microsoft operations framework (2007), http://www.microsoft.com/technet/solutionaccelerators/cits/mo/mof/default.mspx

  16. Jacobson, I., Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J.: The Unified Software Development Process. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Quality Assurance Institute: A software defect management process. Research Report number 8 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hirmanpour, I., Schofield, J.: Defect management through the personal software process. Crosstalk, The Journal of Defense Software Engineering (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kajko-Mattsson, M.: A conceptual model of software maintenance. In: ICSE 1998: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Software engineering, pp. 422–425. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. April, A., Hayes, J.H., Abran, A., Dumke, R.: Software maintenance maturity model (smmm): the software maintenance process model: Research articles. J. Softw. Maint. Evol. 17(3), 197–223 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Eierman, M.A., Niederman, F., Adams, C.: Dss theory: a model of constructs and relationships. Decis. Support Syst. 14(1), 1–26 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yin, R.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publishing, Beverly Hills (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Eisenhardt, K.: Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14, 532–550 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mays, R.G., Jones, C.L., Holloway, G.J., Studinski, D.P.: Experiences with defect prevention. IBM Syst. J. 29(1), 4–32 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. CEN Workshop Agreement CWA 14924-1: European Guide to Good Practice in Knowledge Management, Part 1. European Committee for Standardization (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhen, J.: It needs help finding root causes. Computerworld 39(33), 26 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Davis, K.: Charting a knowledge base solution: empowering student-employees and delivering expert answers. In: SIGUCCS 2002: Proceedings of the 30th annual ACM SIGUCCS conference on User services, pp. 236–239. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Jackson, A., Lyon, G., Eaton, J.: Documentation meets a knowledge base: blurring the distinction between writing and consulting (a case study). In: SIGDOC 1998: Proceedings of the 16th annual international conference on Computer documentation, pp. 5–13. ACM Press, New York (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Andreas Jedlitschka Outi Salo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jäntti, M., Pylkkänen, N. (2008). Improving Customer Support Processes: A Case Study. In: Jedlitschka, A., Salo, O. (eds) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5089. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69566-0_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69566-0_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69564-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69566-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics