Israeli Water Use Patterns: Resource Conservation and Transboundary Security

  • Joy Braunstein


This chapter proposes that a successfully implemented water conservation management policy can play a role in Israel’s ability to increase physical, human and environmental transboundary security. Fresh water reliability is critical to the security of any country, especially those which are arid and semi-arid in nature. In such regions annual rainfall is predictably unreliable and droughts are the norm. Thus, when water resources become additionally scarce due to compounding societal pressures, they may become a point of tension between riparian neighbors who find themselves in competition for increasingly scarce resources. Israel is tied by treaty, hydrology, and infrastructure to the water use of its riparian neighbors - Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and the Palestinians - and has some minor hydro-political ties to Egypt as well. As such, any analysis of Israel’s water policy must consider domestic and transboundary security concerns.


Environmental Security Transboundary Water Resources Hydro-politics Water Conservation Policy 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allan, J.A.; Mallat, Chibli, 1995: Water in the Middle East: Legal, Political and Commercial Implications (London-New York:: I.B. Taurus).Google Scholar
  2. Brunee, Jutta; Toope, Stephen J., 1997: “Environmental Security and Freshwater Resources: Ecosystem Regime Building”, in: American Journal of International Law, 26,19 (University of Kassel, Center for Environmental Systems Research, WaterGap 2.1-Waashington, D.C.: World Bank); at: <>.Google Scholar
  3. Copeland, Claudia: Cody, Betsy, 2002: “Terrorism and Security Issues Facing the Water Infrastructure Sector”. CRS Report for Congress, Resources, Science and Industry Division (Washington, D.C.: CRS).Google Scholar
  4. Glassman, Hillel, 2002: “The Right of Nature to Water” [in Hebrew], in: Water and Irrigation: 422.Google Scholar
  5. Gleick, Peter, 1993: “Water and Conflict”, in: International Security, 18,1 (Summer): 79–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gleick, Peter, 1997: “Water 2050: Moving Toward a Sustainable Vision for the Earth’s Freshwater”. Working Paper of the Pacific Institute, Prepared for the Comprehensive Freshwater Assesssment of the UN General Assembly (Oakland, CA).Google Scholar
  7. Homer-Dixon, Thomas, 2001: The Ingenuity Gap: Can we solve the problems of the future? (London: Random House).Google Scholar
  8. Kislev, Yoav, 2001: “The water economy of Israel”. Prepared for Water in the Jordan Valley: Technical Solutions & Regional Cooperation (Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma, International Program Center, Center for Peace Studies).Google Scholar
  9. Lyle Tillman, John, 1985: Design for Human Ecosystems: Landscape, Land use and Natural Resources (New York: Island Press).Google Scholar
  10. Postel, Sandra; Peterson, Jane A., 1996: Dividing the waters: Food Security, Ecosystem Health, and the New Politics of Scarcity (Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute).Google Scholar
  11. Shuval, Hillel, 1993, “Institutional Aspects of the Management of Water Quantity and Quality on the Shared Transboundary Water Resources of the Jordan River Basin”, in: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Water Resources in the Middle East: Policy and Institutional Aspects, Urbana, Ill: IWRA, 24–27 October.Google Scholar
  12. Water Commissioner of Israel, 2002: The water sector of Israel, confronting the challenges (Tel Aviv: Water Commissioner of Israel, August).Google Scholar
  13. Water Commissioner of Israel, 2002a: Water in Israel, consumption and production, 2001 (Tel Aviv: Water Commissioner of Israel).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joy Braunstein
    • 1
  1. 1.International Environmental PolicyUniversity of Pittsburgh - GSPIAPennsylvaniaUSA

Personalised recommendations